Trouble Every Day (2001)

Nathan Shumate

< BACK

     If the particular genius of the British is to take exploitative film elements and make them genteel (see my recent review of The Plague of the Zombies), then the genius of the French is to take similar elements and make them... distinctly underwhelming.

     Part of the problem is that, as you probably know, France is one of those countries where movies are made with government money as part of a cultural arts program, as opposed to private funds from investors who might like a return on their francs. (Or their euros now, I suppose.) Suddenly, you have cinematic expression entirely freed from the necessity of attracting and satisfying a paying audience. It's not entertainment any more, you know -- it's art! And art need not stoop to such petty things as "communication"; that's for that debased mass media, you know. And all those Frenchmen (and Canadians, and whoever else lives in a country where the film industry is a government-run welfare program) who line up to see imported American product, instead of home-grown artistry? Philistines, one and all.

     All of which a long way to say that Ms. Denis stopped well short of making me want to watch her movie. I have no problem with "difficult" movies, or movies that ask the audience to meet them halfway and connect the dots instead of having things all spelled out. But first, you have to give the audience a reason to want to put for that effort, and "I made a movie so you should watch it" doesn't qualify.

     After a credits sequence over the top of two people kissing, we see what appears to be a woman (Beatrice Dalle) seducing a man by standing around, and then eating and killing him. At least, that's what you get when you connect the dots; what you actually see is long static shots of the woman (her name turns out to be Cor¨¦, so I'll call her that, even though we don't find out until somewhere around the midway point) on the sidewalk, watching as a man in a big red truck drives by. We all know how big red trucks drive the ladies wild, right? He gets out of the truck and walks toward her. Next thing we know, it's night, and a black man on a motorcycle (Alex Descas) examines the still-open door of the truck and then walks into a nearby field. He finds what is apparently the driver's bloody body (hey, it's night, you know -- it could have been someone else entirely), and then Cor¨¦, hiding in the bushes with a bloody face. All of this takes approximately twelve minutes (or twenty-three days -- I wasn't watching too closely), with no dialogue and no music.

     We then meet what must be our protagonist, since everyone else is even less protagonisty: American Shane Brown (Vincent Gallo) with his bride June (Tricia Vessey), on a plane over to Paris for their honeymoon. I don't know what exactly prompted the casting here, but Vincent Gallo -- with his thin face, aquiline nose, sallow skin, moustache that extends past the corners of his mouth, sideburns, week's worth of stubble, and messy greasy hair -- is the most stereotypically French-looking person in the entire cast. Compared to him, everyone else needs to wear berets and juggle baguets to even look remotely Gallic. Is this maybe what qualifies as humor in an arthouse flick? Seriously, it was only after ten minutes that I realized that he was supposed to be an American, not a Frenchman with his accent dubbed away.

     Anyway, Shane's got problems. He's sick, for one thing (I mean, Vincent Gallo looks sick to begin with, but this is for real), taking unspecified pills. He also has disturbing daydreams of people lying around covered in blood. Again, no music, static shots for minutes on end... leave it to the French to make bloody corpses boring.

     It could be worse, though. What's worse than exciting things made boring, you ask? Why, things that are naturally boring, made more boring! We get to experience the cinematic thrills of watching the Browns lengthily check in, then follow the maid (Florence Loiret-Caille) walk their bags aaaaaaall the way to their room, and then make the bed since the room didn't get made up before they got there... Then we get to follow the maid back to the locker room at the end of her shift where she changes her clothes (leave it to the French to make breasts uninteresting) and washes her feet in the sink. Boy, that's some good cinema there, ain't it?

     But if that isn't enough, we also get to watch Shane have a nap, and June check the water in the jacuzzi! Boy, I'm glad they find a reason to break pace soon, or I'd just have hyperventilated to death from all of the excitement.

     It turns out that Shane had an ulterior motive for choosing Paris as their honeymoon locale, and it wasn't the cheese selection: Shane works for a pharmaceutical company, and he's been trying to get ahold of Dr. Leo Semenau, who use to work at a neurological lab there, but left suddenly a few months ago. Would it surprise you to learn that Dr. Leo is Cor¨¦'s husband who brought her back home from eating her trystmate, and who habitually locks her in their home while he goes out and does doctorly things? She escapes again -- it looks like this is a daily routine, bordering on the ridiculous. (I'm tickled by visions of Dr. Leo coming home to a bloody-chinned Cor¨¦ gnawing on her latest seductee, doing his best Ricky Ricardo: "Cor¨¦, you got some 'splainin' to do!")

     In many ways, that's basically the whole movie. But naturally, that's not all we sit through. Apparently, static mundane shots and silent emotional distance are what qualify as "subtlety" in Denis' book. So we get plenty of looooong slooooow scenes of Shane trying to find Dr. Leo, of Vincent pawing his forehead and rubbing his eyes, of June soaking in the tub, of Shane staring at June in the tub (dear lord, leave it to the French to make pubic hair uninteresting), of the maid staring at the Do Not Disturb sign on their door (I'm sure you've seen one of those before, Toots). We do eventually get some exposition, but not nearly enough for things really to make sense (hey, we've got to make room for those long scenes in which nothing happens; some things just have to be sacrificed). In a scene in which Shane explains all of this to someone we've never met before (nor do we ever get an incling why he's telling her this), Shane had recruited the brilliant Dr. Leo for his company, then stolen his research. Oh, and Shane also thought Cor¨¦ was hot. That's it. No, seriously, that's all the exposition. All delivered (you guessed it) in a loooong sloooow scene.

     So what was this research? We never honestly find out, but apparently it's what is causing Cor¨¦ to be an oversexed cannibal (and we get a graphic rendition of that late in the game when a neighbor teen breaks into the locked house for no apparent reason except to be seduced by a woman who was going to eat him during sex). And Shane's got "it" too, whatever it is, which explains why he gets paranoid when snuggling with June and runs into the bathroom to "finish" (Vincent Gallo in a money shot -- MY EYES!!!!).

     All of which leads up to the most tasteless moment in a movie which has, a few episodes aside, been fairly reserved and standoffish (not to mention loooong and sloooow). After all that, it's a jarring, completely unenjoyable moment when Shane trails the maid to the locker room, wordlessly seduces her (it seems she's been taken with him all along -- although why you'd go after an ersatz Frenchman in Paris is beyond me), and then eats her. Yes, I'm sure it seemed like a witty double entendre at some point to someone, but watching her scream endlessly (even here, we've got to hold to type and make it loooooong and sloooow) while Shane forces his bloody face between her legs is NO reward for having sat through as much as I've sat through.

     I'm trying to find a level at which this movie works for me. I'm not having any luck. I think I just may have to swear off Gallic cinema for the time being. Which probably won't offend anyone in the French film industry -- after all, it's not like they're counting on an audience, right?

From Cold Fusion Video Reviews

< BACK