1970及其前因后果 :: 一瞥惊鸿黄金屋

 >1970<+itself :: Books   

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

 

Architecture in Cinema: A Relation of Representation Based on Space

作者:居尔·卡斯马兹·埃尔克 (Gül Kaçmaz Erk) 著

Saarbrücken:  LAP Lambert Academic Publishing

ISBN: 978-3-8383-0869-2

132

20098月第一版

 

 < INDEX

However, it can be argued that architecture has borrowed some of its concepts from cinema such as framing, montage and, in turn, cinema fromarchitecture such as space, window. Furthermore both have borrowed from otherfields, for example, from art: perspective, depth, and from philosophy: representation, reality, and symbol. Architecture and cinema have much in commonwhen these concepts are concerned.

'Then the bad guy goes to the girl's house and kidnaps her. He takes her to the suburbs and locks her up in an abandoned, ruined building. At that moment the lover of the girl who is a policeman runs after a thief in the slums.' In a film, it seems impossible tonarrate these events independent of space.

Various optical effects, such as the stationary point of the camera, or scale of the shot, can give clues about off-screen space. A door is seen from the outside. The viewer knows that this door is a part of a public building as many people go in and out. He knows that the camera is in an urban space, a street or a square, since he sees the door from eye level. If the door is seen from bird's eye view, for instance, he imagines that the shot is taken from a high-rise building nearby. When the viewer sees a man at a window on the next shot, he imagines that the man is looking at the door from the window of a high-rise building.

作者简介

北爱尔兰贝尔法斯特女王大学建筑学高级讲师(副教授,博士)。

她在美国、荷兰、土耳其、爱尔兰和英国从事建筑和电影交叉领域研究超过20年。

About Gül Kaçmaz Erk

A senior lecturer (Assoc. Prof. Dr.) in Architecture at Queen’s University Belfast in Northern Ireland, UK.

She has been conducting interdisciplinary research at the intersection of architecture and cinema in the USA, the Netherlands, Turkey, Ireland and the UK for 20+ years.

Synopsis

Architecture, whether in the foreground or background, is an intrinsic part of any film, and cinema holds a position as a transformative reference in contemporary architecture. This book addresses the role of architecture in cinema, and through a focus on the use of space, it presents a critical overview of the relation between the two. The cinematic camera, with its unique viewpoint, has the ability to transform architectural space. Through framing, flattening and editing, cinematic space, as the representation of architectural space, focuses on its certain qualities, while eliminating others. Thus, cinema emphasizes individual aspects of space that may be overlooked when the whole context is considered. Space 'acts' in the foreground rather than simply filling the background in the films of Peter Greenaway and Wim Wenders, which are used to analyze two significant cinematic approaches to space, space as form and space as symbol. The detailed analysis of Greenaway's The Belly of an Architect and Wenders' Der Himmel über Berlin (Wings of Desire) offers an innovative and original perspective on space to those interested in both fields of architecture and film studies.

——Amazon.com

居尔·卡斯马兹·埃尔克 Gül Kaçmaz Erk

本 站 简 评

Brief comment

这是一个特别典型的题目,建筑界不少人关注这类内容,而电影界就少得多。

这本书很像一本硕士论文,结构比较简单,层次不甚丰富,属于肯定无缘优秀论文却可能接近于涉险过关的那种。它以空间为核心考察建筑与电影之间勉为其难的关系,一看就是正统建筑专业出身。

本书前一半建立基本理论,后一半以格林纳威和文德斯两位导演为例分析具体作品。这样的布局比较稳妥,但有一个问题是,凡理论程度高的地方基本都会远离电影,或远离建筑,或远离两者。一旦面对作品,对电影的复述又远多于剖析。缺陷不一定来自作者——她长期从事该交叉领域的研究,可能来自这个话题本身。

     
     
   
 

Jan 20, 2024

 < INDEX