FROM CAL1GARI TO HITLER A PSYCHOLOGICAL HISTORY OF THE GERMAN FILM FROM CAUGARI TO HITLER A PSYCHOLOGICAL HISTORY OF THE GERMAN FILM By SIEGFRIED KRACAUER PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS Copyright, 1947, by Princeton University Press Manufactured in the United States of America Hardback Reprint Edition, 1W PREFACE THIS book is not concerned with German films merely for their own sake ; rather, it aims at increasing our knowledge of pre-Hitler Ger- many in a specific way. It is my contention that through an analysis of the German films deep psychological dispositions predominant in Germany from 1918 to 1933 can be exposed dispositions which influenced the course of events during that time and which will have to be reck- oned with in the post-Hitler era. I have reason to believe that the use made here of films as a medium of research can profitably be extended to studies of current mass behavior in the United States and elsewhere. I also believe that studies of this kind may help in the planning of films not to men- tion other media of communication which will effectively implement the cultural aims of the United Nations. I am most indebted to Miss Iris Barry, Curator of the Museum of Modern Art Film Library, New York, to whom my book literally owes its existence; she not only suggested this study, but assisted generously and in many ways towards its realization. I am grateful to the Rockefeller Foundation, which enabled me to embark upon my enterprise, and to Mr. John Marshall of that office for his con- tinued interest in its progress. I wish to express my deep gratitude to the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation, which hon- ored me twice with a fellowship, and to Mr. Henry Allen Moe, Secretary General of this Foundation, who never tired of furthering my endeavors. Among those to whom I am very indebted for con- tinual advice and help in the organization of the material and in matters of style, I expressly name Miss Barbara Deming, former analyst of the Library of Congress Film Project; and Miss Mar- garet Miller, Miss Ruth Olson and Mr. Arthur Rosenheimer, Jr., staff members of the Museum of Modern Art. Sincere thanks are also due to the Librarian of the Museum of Modern Art, Mr. Bernard Karpel, and the members of the Library staff ; they patiently and vi PREFACE expertly lent me a helping hand whenever I needed it and made me feel at home in this Library, with its invaluable facilities for studies of the film. Finally, I wish to thank my wife, though whatever I may say to thank her is insufficient. As always, she has helped me in the preparation of this book, and as always I have benefited greatly from her faculty of perceiving the essential and penetrating to its core. SIEGFRIED KKACAUER May, 1946 New York City CONTENTS PREFACE v INTRODUCTION 3 I: THE ARCHAIC PERIOD (1895-1918) 1. PEACE AND WAR. 15 2. FOREBODINGS 28 3. GENESIS OF UFA 35 II: THE POSTWAR PERIOD (1918-1984) 4. THE SHOCK OF FREEDOM 43 5. CALIGARI 61 6. PROCESSION OF TYRANTS 77 7. DESTINY 88 8. MTTTE CHAOS 96 9. CRUCIAL DILEMMA 107 10. FROM REBELLION TO SUBMISSION 115 III: THE STABILIZED PERIOD (19&4-19S9) 11. DECLINE 131 12. FROZEN GROUND 138 13. THE PROSTITUTE AND THE ADOLESCENT 153 14. THE NEW REALISM 165 15. MONTAGE 181 16. BRIEF REVEILLE 190 IV: THE PRE-HITLER PERIOD (1930-1983) 17. SONGS AND ILLUSIONS 203 18. MURDERER AMONG Us 215 19. TIMID HERESIES 223 20. FOR A BETTER WORLD 232 21. NATIONAL EPIC 251 vii viii CONTENTS SUPPLEMENT: PROPAGANDA ANJ> THE NAZI WAR FILM 1. NAZI VIEWS AND MEASURES 275 2. FILM DEVICES 277 3. THE SWASTIKA WORLD 280 4. SCREEN DRAMATURGY 288 5. CONFLICT WITH REALITY 297 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS 308 BIBLIOGRAPHY 333 INDEX 347 ILLUSTRATIONS 1. PASSION: The threat of mass domination 2. CATJGABI : Insane authority (From the Museum of Modern Art Film Library) 3. CAXJGARI: A draftsman's imagination (From the Museum of Modern Art Film Library) 4*. CALIGARI: The three flights of stairs in the lunatic asylum symbolize Or. Caligari's position at the top of the hierarchy (From the Museum of Modern Art Film Library) 5. NOSFERATTT: The vampire, defeated by love, dissolves into thin air (From Paul Rotha, The Film Till Now, Jonathan Cape, Ltd., 1930) 6. DR. MABTJSE THE GAMBLER : Interpenetration of realistic and expressionist style, betraying the close relationship between Mabuse and Caligari (From the collection of Charles L. Turner) 7. WAXWORKS: A phantasmagoria Jack-the-Bippcr pur- suing the lovers (From the collection of Charles L. Turner) 8. WAXWORKS: Ivan the Terrible, an incarnation of in- satiable lusts and unheard-of cruelties (From the Museum of Modern Art Film Library) 9. DESTINY: The huge wall symbolizing Fate's inacces- sibility (From the collection of Charles L. Turner) 10. NIBKLUNGKN: Triumph of the ornamental over the human (From the Museum of Modern Art Film Library) 11. NIBELUNGBN : The patterns of Nibelungen are resumed in Nazi pageantry (From the Museum of Modern Art Film Library) 12. TRIUMPH OF THE WILL: The patterns of Nibelungen are resumed in Nazi pageantry (From the Museum of Modern Art Film Library) 13. NEW YEAR'S EVE: The suicide of the caf6-owncr 14*. THE LAST LATTGH: Humiliation incarnate (From the Museum of Modern Art Film Library) iz x ILLUSTRATIONS 15. THE LAST I^UGH: The revolving door something be- tween a merry-go-round and a roulette wheel (From the Museum of Modern Art Film Library) 16. A GILASS oir WATER: With its stress on symmetry tne de*cor breathes romantic nostalgia rFrom the collection of Charles L. Turner) 17. PEAK OF DESTINY: Mountain climbers are devotees per- forming the rites of a cult CFrom the collection of Dr. Kurt Pintbus) 18. THE GOI^EM: The Golem, a figure of clay, animated by his master, Rabbi Loew (From the Museum of Modern Art Film Library) 19. WABNi^a SHADOWS: Magical therapy the Count and his guests follow their shadows into the realm o tne subconscious (From the Museum of Modern Art Film Library) 20. FRIDERICUS REX: The young king (From the Museum of Modern Art Film Library) 21 THE STRKET: Mute objects take on life (From the Museum of Modern Art Film Library) 22 THE STREET: This gesture recurrent in many German films is symptomatic of the desire to return to the maternal womb CFrom the Museum of Modern Art Film Library) 23. VARIETY: .Tannings' bulky back plays a conspicuous role in the prison scene (From the Museum of Modern Art Film Library) 24. VARIETY: The inquisitive camera breaks into the magic circle of action (From the Museum of Modern Art Film Library) 25. WATS TO STRENGTH AND BEAUTY: Tableau vivant of a Greek gymnasium (From the collection of Dr. Kurt Pinthus) 26. TARTTJITE : The grand-style manner 27. METROPOLIS : Sham alliance between labor and capital (From the Museum of Modern Art Film Library) 28. METROPOLIS : Ornamental despair (From the Museum of Modern Art Film Library) 29. THE JOYUESS STREET : As ta Nielsen in one of the roles in which she discards social conventions in her abundance of love (From the Museum o Modern Art Film Library) 30. KlAMPF DER TERXIA: One of the many youth films ex- pressing a longing for adolescence (From the Museum of Modern Art Film Library) ILLUSTRATIONS xl 31. THE JOYLESS STREET: The ghastliness of real life (From the Museum of Modern Art Film Library) 32. THE JOYLESS STREET : Realism, not symbolism (From the Museum of Modern Art Film Library) 33. SECRETS OF A SOUL: Dreams cinema tically externalized 34s. THE LOVE OP JEANNE NEY: The orgy of anti-Bolshevist soldiery a scene elicited from life itself (From the Museum of Modern Art Film Library) 35. THE LOVE OF JEANNE NEY : The broken mirror, a silent witness, tells of glamour and destruction (From the Museum of Modern Art Film Library) 36. THE LOVE OF JEANNE NEY : Casual configurations of life (From the Museum of Modern Art Film Library) 37. BERLIN : Patterns of movement (From the Museum of Modern Art Film Library) 38. BERLIN : What once denoted chaos is now simply part of the record a fact among facts (From the Museum of Modern Art Film Library) 39. BERLIN: A close-up of the gutter illustrates the harsh- ness of mechanized life (From the Museum of Modern Art Film Library) 40. ACCIDENT: The use of distorting mirrors helps to defy deep-rooted conventions (From the collection of Charles L. Turner) 41. DREI VON DER TANKSTELLE: A playful daydream woven of the materials of everyday life 42. SONG OF LIFE : A symbolic scene which glorifies vitality (From the collection of Herman G. Weinberg) 43. THE MAN WITHOUT A NAME: The nightmarish work- ings of bureaucracy 44. THE VICTOR: Hans Albers, the embodiment of popular daydreams 45. THE BLUE ANGEL : Jannings as the professor taunted by his pupils (From the Museum of Modern Art Film Library) 46. THE BLUE ANGEL: Marlene Dietrich as Lola Lola provocative legs and an over-all impassivity (From the Museum of Modern Art Film Library) 47. M : The empty stairwell echoing with the cries of Elsie's mother (From the Museum of Modern Art Film Library) 48. M: The knives reflected around Lorre's face define him as a prisoner of his evil urges (From the Museum of Modern Art Film Library) xii ILLUSTRATIONS 4<9. M: The group of criminals, beggars and street women sitting in judgment on the child-murderer (From the Museum of Modern Art Film Library) 50. EMXX, TJ3srr> i>rm DETEXTIVE: The thief, a Pied Piper in reverse, pursued by the children under a radiant morn- ing sun 51. MADCHEN IN UNIFORM: The headmistress a feminine Frederick the G-reat (From the collection of Theodore Huff) 52. MAJDCHEN nsr UNIFORM: : To prepare the audience for this scene, the staircase is featured throughout the film' (From the Museum of Modern Art Film Library) 53. WEST-FRONT 1918: Field hospital filled with moans and agonized cries (From the collection of Herman O. Weinberg) 54. THE BEGGAR'S OPERA: Glass screens transform the crowded and smoky caf6 into a confusing maze (From Paul Rotha, Celluloid, Longmans, Green & Co., Inc., 1933) 55. COMRADESHIP : The German miners about to remove the iron fence set up since Versailles (From the collection of Herman G. Weinberg) 56. COMRADESHIP : Grerman miners in the shower room the audience is let into one of the arcana of everyday life (From William Hunter, Scrutiny of Cinema, Wishart & Co., 1982) 57. KTTECIJE WAMPE: Young athletes at the Red sports festival which glorifies collective life 58. EIGHT GTRLS nsr A BOAT : This film betrays the affinity of the earlier Youth Movement with the Nazi spirit 59. AVALANCHE: Emphasis on cloud conglomerations in- dicates the ultimate fusion of the mountain- and the Hitler-cult 60. TRIUMPH: OB- THE WIXIL: Emphasis on cloud conglomera- tions indicates the ultimate fusion of the mountain- and the Hitler-cult (From the Museum of Modern Art Film Library) 61. THE REBEL: A thinly masked Hitlerite 62. THE BI/UE LIG-HT: Junta, an incarnation of elemental powers (From the collection of Herman G. Weinberg) 63. THE ANTTHEM: OE- HIETTXHEN: The old king 64. DAWIQ-: The smell of real war FROM CALIGARI TO HITLER A PSYCHOLOGICAL HISTORY OF THE GERMAN FILM INTRODUCTION WHEN, from 1920 on, German films began to break the boycott established by the Allies against the former enemy, they struck New York, London and Paris audiences as achievements that were as puzzling as they were fascinating. 1 Archetype of all forthcoming postwar films, THE CABINET OF DR. CALIGABI aroused passionate dis- cussions. While one critic called it "the first significant attempt at the expression of a creative mind in the medium of cinematog- raphy," 2 another stated : "It has the odor of tainted food. It leaves a taste of cinders in the mouth." 3 In exposing the German soul, the postwar films seemed to make even more of a riddle of it. Macabre, sinister, morbid: these were the favorite adjectives used in describing them. With the passage of time the German movies changed themes and modes of representation. But despite all changes they preserved certain traits typical of their sensational start even after 1924, a year considered the beginning of a long period of decline. In the appraisal of these traits complete unanimity has been reached among American and European observers. What they most admire is the talent with which, from the time of CALIGARI, German film directors marshaled the whole visual sphere: their outspoken feeling for im- pressive settings, their virtuosity in developing action through ap- propriate lighting. Connoisseurs also appreciate the conspicuous part played in German films by a camera which the Germans were the first to render completely mobile. In addition, there is no expert who would not acknowledge the organizational power operative in these films a collective discipline which accounts for the unity of * Lubitsch's historical costume film PASSION the first German production to be brought to this country was shown at New York late in 1920. In April 1921, there followed the New York release of THE CABINET OF DR. CAUOABI. a Rotha, FUm Titt Now, p. 178. 9 Amiguet, Cintma/ CMmat, p. 87. 4 INTRODUCTION narrative as well as for the perfect integration of lights, settings and actors. 4 Owing to such unique values, the German screen exerted world-wide influence, especially after the total evolution of its' studio and camera devices in THE LAST LAUGH (1924) and VARIETY (1925). "It was the German camera-work (in the fullest sense of that term) which most deeply impressed Hollywood." 5 In a char- acteristic expression of respect, Hollywood hired all the German film directors, actors and technicians it could get its hands on. France, too, proved susceptible to screen manners on the other side of the Rhine. And the classic Russian films benefited by the German science of lighting. 6 Admiration and imitation, however, need not be based on intrinsic understanding. Much has been written about the German cinema, in a continual attempt to analyze its exceptional qualities and, if pos- sible, to solve the disquieting problems bound up with its existence. But this literature, essentially aesthetic, deals with films as if they were autonomous structures. Eor example, the question as to why it was in Germany that the camera first reached complete mobility has not even been raised. Nor has the evolution of the German cinema been grasped. Paul Rotha, who along with the collaborators of the English film magazine Close Up early recognized the artistic merits of German films, confines himself to a merely chronological scheme. "In surveying the German cinema from the end of the war until the coming of the American dialogue film," he says, "the output may roughly be divided into three groups. Firstly, the theatrical costume picture ; secondly, the big middle period of the studio art films ; and thirdly, the decline of the German film in order to fall into line with the American 'picture-sense' output." 7 Why these three groups of films were bound to follow each other, Rotha does not try to explain. Such external accounts are the rule. They lead straight into danger- ous misconceptions. Attributing the decline after 1924 to the exodus of important German film people and American interference in German film business, most authors dispose of the German pictures of the time by qualifying them as "Americanized" or "international- 4 Rotha, Film Till Now, pp. 177-78; Barry, Program Notes, Series I, program 4, and Series III, program 2; Potamkin, "Kino and Lichtspiel," Close Up, Nov. 1929, p. 388; Vincent, Sistoire de VArt Cintmatographiq'ue, pp. 189-40. 5 Barry, Program Notes, Series I, program 4. Jahier "42 Ans de Cinema," Le Role intellectuel fa Cintma, p. 86. 7 Rotha, Film Till Now, p. 177. It should be noted that Rotha expresses the views then held of the German movies by French and English film aesthetes, although his book is more vigorous and perceptive than those which had preceded it INTRODUCTION 5 ized" products. 8 It will be seen that these allegedly "Americanized" films were in fact true expressions of contemporaneous German life. And, in general, it will be seen that the technique, the story content, and the evolution of the films of a nation are fully understandable only in relation to the actual psychological pattern of this nation. n The films of a nation reflect its mentality in a more direct way than other artistic media for two reasons : First, films are never the product of an individual. The Russian film director Pudovkin emphasizes the collective character of film production by identifying it with industrial production: "The tech- nical manager can achieve nothing without foremen and workmen and their collective effort will lead to no good result if every collab- orator limits himself only to a mechanical performance of his narrow function. Team work is that which makes every, even the most insignificant, task a part of the living work and organically connects it to the general task," 9 Prominent German film directors shared these views and acted accordingly. Watching the shooting of a ffl directed by G. W. Pabst in the French Joinville studios, I noticed that he readily followed the suggestions of his technicians as to details of the settings and the distribution of lights. Pabst told me that he considered contributions of that kind invaluable. Since any film production unit embodies a mixture of heterogeneous interests and inclinations, teamwork in this field tends to exclude arbitrary handling of screen material, suppressing individual peculiarities in favor of traits common to many people. 10 Second, films address themselves, and appeal, to the anonymous multitude. Popular films or, to be more precise, popular screen motifs can therefore be supposed to satisfy existing mass desires. It has occasionally been remarked that Hollywood manages to sell films which do not give the masses what they really want. In this opinion Hollywood films more often than not stultify and misdirect a public persuaded by its own passivity and by overwhelming pub- licity into accepting them. However, the distorting influence of 8 Bardeche and Brasillach, History of Motion Pictures, p. 258 ff.; Vincent, JETfc- toire de ?Art Cintmatographigue, pp. 161-62; Rotha, Film Till Now, pp. 176-77; Jeanne, Le Cinema Allemand," I/Art Cmtmatoffraphique, VIII, 4fl ff.j etc. 8 Pudovkin, Film Techv&gue, p. 186. > Balazs, Der Oeist dtt Films, pp. 187-88. 6 INTRODUCTION Hollywood mass entertainment should not be overrated. The manip- ulator depends upon the inherent qualities of his material; even the official Nazi war films, pure propaganda products as they were, mir- rored certain national characteristics which could not be fabricated. 11 What holds true of them applies all the more to the films of a com- petitive society. Hollywood cannot afford to ignore spontaneity on the part of the public. General discontent becomes apparent in wan- ing box-office receipts, and the film industry, vitally interested in profit, is bound to adjust itself, so far as possible, to the changes of mental climate. 12 To be sure, American audiences receive what Holly- wood wants them to want; but in the long run public desires deter- mine the nature of Hollywood films. 18 Ill What films reflect are not so much explicit credos as psycho- logical dispositions those deep layers of collective mentality which extend more or less below the dimension of consciousness. Of course, popular magazines and broadcasts, bestsellers, ads, fashions in lan- guage and other sedimentary products of a people's cultural life also yield valuable information about predominant attitudes, widespread inner tendencies. But the medium of the screen exceeds these sources in inclusiveness. Owing to diverse camera activities, cutting and many special devices, films are able, and therefore obliged, to scan the whole visible world. This effort results in what Erwin Panofsky in a memorable lecture defined as the "dynamization of space" : "In a movie theater ... the spectator has a fixed seat, but only physically. . . . Aesthetically, he is in permanent motion, as his eye identifies itself with the lens of the camera which permanently shifts in distance and direction. And the space presented to the spectator is as movable as the spectator is himself. Not only do solid bodies move in space, but space itself moves, changing, turning, dissolving and recrystal- lizing. . . ," 14 11 See the analyses of these films in the Supplement. "Cf. Farrell, "Will the Commercialization of Publishing Destroy Good Writing?" New Directions, 9, 1946, p. 26. 13 In pre-Hitler Germany, the film industry was less concentrated than in this country. Ufa was preponderant without being omnipotent, and smaller companies car- ried on beside the bigger ones. This led to a diversity of products, which intensified the reflective function of the German screen. Panofsky, "Style and Medium in the Moving Pictures," transition, 1987, pp. 124U25. INTRODUCTION 7 In the course of their spatial conquests, films of fiction and films of fact alike capture innumerable components of the world they mirror: huge mass displays, casual configurations of human bodies and inanimate objects, and an endless succession of unobtrusive phenomena. As a matter of fact, the screen shows itself particularly concerned with the unobtrusive, the normally neglected. Preceding all other cinematic devices, close-ups appeared at the very beginning of the cinema and continued to assert themselves throughout its his- tory. "When I got to directing films," Erich von Stroheim told an interviewer, "I would work day and night, without food, without sleeping sometimes, to have every detail perfect, even to descriptions of how facial expressions should change." 15 Films seem to fulfill an innate mission in ferreting out minutiae. Inner life manifests itself in various elements and conglomera- tions of external lif e, especially in those almost imperceptible surface data which form an essential part of screen treatment. In recording the visible world whether current reality or an imaginary universe films therefore provide clues to hidden mental processes. Survey- ing the era of silent films, Horace M. Kallen points to the revealing function of close-ups: "Slight actions, such as the incidental play of the fingers, the opening or clenching of a hand, dropping a handker- chief, playing with some apparently irrelevant object, stumbling, falling, seeking and not finding and the like, became the visible hiero- glyphs of the unseen dynamics of human relations. . . ." le Films are particularly inclusive because their "visible hieroglyphs" supple- ment the testimony of their stories proper. And permeating both the stories and the visuals, the "unseen dynamics of human relations" are more or less characteristic of the inner life of the nation from which the films emerge. That films particularly suggestive of mass desires coincide with outstanding box-office successes would seem a matter of course. But a hit may cater only to one of many coexisting demands, and not even to a very specific one. In her paper on the methods of selection of films to be preserved by the Library of Congress, Barbara Deming elaborates upon this point : **Even if one could figure out . . . which were the most popular films, it might turn out that in saving those at the top, one would be saving the same dream over and over again . . . and losing other dreams which did not happen to appear in the 18 Lewis, "Erich von Stroheim . . ," New York Times, June 22, 1941. Kallen, Art and Freedom, II, 809. 8 INTRODUCTION most popular individual pictures but did appear over and over again in a great number of cheaper, less popular pictures." 17 What counts is not so much the statistically measurable popularity of films as the popularity of their pictorial and narrative motifs. Persistent reitera- tion of these motifs marks them as outward projections of inner urges. And they obviously carry most symptomatic weight when they occur in both popular and unpopular films, in grade B pictures as well as in superproductions. This history of the German screen is a history of motifs pervading films of all levels. IV To speak of the peculiar mentality of a nation by no means implies the concept of a fixed national character. The interest here lies exclusively in such collective dispositions or tendencies as prevail within a nation at a certain stage of its development. What fears and hopes swept Germany immediately after World War I? Questions of this kind are legitimate because of their limited range ; incidentally, they are the only ones which can be answered by an appropriate analysis of the films of the time. In other words, this book is not con- cerned with establishing some national character pattern allegedly elevated above history, but it is concerned with the psychological pattern of a people at a particular time. There is no lack of studies covering the political, social, economic and cultural history of the great nations. I propose to add to these well-known types that of a psychological history. It is always possible that certain screen motifs are relevant only to part of the nation, but' caution in this respect should not prejudice one against the existence of tendencies affecting the nation as a whole. They are the less questionable as common traditions and per- manent interrelationship between the different strata of the popula- tion exert a unifying influence in the depths of collective life. In pre- Nazi Germany, middle-class penchants penetrated all strata; they competed with the political aspirations of the Left and also filled the voids of the upper-class mind. This accounts for the nation-wide appeal of the German cinema a cinema firmly rooted in middle- class mentality. From 1930 to 1933, the actor Hans Albers played "Deming, 'The Library of Congress Fflm Project: Exposition of a Method," Library of Congrest Quarterly, 1944, p. 20. INTRODUCTION 9 the heroes of films in which typically bourgeois daydreams found outright fulfillment; his exploits gladdened the hearts of worker audiences, and in MADCHEN IN UNIFORM we see his photograph worshiped by the daughters of aristocratic families. Scientific convention has it that in the chain of motivations national characteristics are effects rather than causes effects of natural surroundings, historic experiences, economic and social con- ditions. And since we are all human beings, similar external factors can be expected to provoke analogous psychological reactions every- where. The paralysis of minds spreading throughout Germany be- tween 1924 and 1929 was not at all specifically German. It would be easy to show that under the influence of analogous circumstances a similar collective paralysis occurs and has occurred in other countries as well. 18 However, the dependence of a people's mental attitudes upon external factors does not justify the frequent disre- gard of these attitudes. Effects may at any time turn into sponta- neous causes. Notwithstanding their derivative character, psycho- logical tendencies often assume independent life, and, instead of automatically changing with ever-changing circumstances, become themselves essential springs of historical evolution. In the course of its history every nation develops dispositions which survive their primary causes and undergo a metamorphosis of their own. They cannot simply be inferred from current external factors, but, con- versely, help determine reactions to such factors. We are all human beings, if sometimes in different ways. These collective dispositions gain momentum in cases of extreme political change. The dissolution of political systems results in the decomposition of psychological systems, and in the ensuing turmoil traditional inner attitudes, now released, are bound to become conspicuous, whether they are chal- lenged or endorsed. That most historians neglect the psychological factor is demon- strated by striking gaps in our knowledge of German history from World War I to Hitler's ultimate triumph the period covered in this book. And yet the dimensions of event, milieu and ideology have 18 Of course, such similarities never amount to more than surface resemblances. External circumstances are nowhere strictly identical, and whatever psychological tendency they entail comes true within a texture of other tendencies which color its meaning. !0 INTRODUCTION been thoroughly investigated. It is well known that the German "Revolution" of November 1918 failed to revolutionize Germany; that the then omnipotent Social Democratic Party proved omnip- otent only in breaking the backbone of the revolutionary forces, but was incapable of liquidating the army, the bureaucracy, the big- estate owners and the moneyed classes ; that these traditional powers actually continued to govern the Weimar Republic which came into shadowy being after 1919. It is also known how hard the young Republic was pressed by the political consequences of the defeat and the stratagems of the leading German industrialists and financiers who unrestrainedly upheld inflation, impoverishing the old middle class. Finally, one knows that after the five years of the Dawes Plan that blessed era of foreign loans so advantageous to big business the economic world crisis dissolved the mirage of stabilization, de- stroyed what was still left of middle-class background and democ- racy, and completed the general despair ty adding mass unemploy- ment. It was in the ruins of "the system" which had never been a true structure that the Nazi spirit flourished. 1 * But these economic, social and political factors do not suffice to explain the tremendous impact of Hitlerism and the chronic inertia in the opposite camp. Significantly, many observant Germans re- fused until the last moment to take Hitler seriously, and even after his rise to power considered the new regime a transitory adventure. Such opinions at least indicate that there was something unaccount- able in the domestic situation, something not to be inferred from circumstances within the normal field of vision. Only a few analyses of the Weimar Republic hint at the psycho- logical mechanisms behind the inherent weakness of the Social Demo- crats, the inadequate conduct of the communists and the strange reactions of the German masses. 20 Franz Neumann is forced to explain the failure of the communists partly in terms of "their inabil- ity to evaluate correctly the psychological factors and sociological trends operating among German workers. . . ." Then he adds to a statement on the Reichstag's limited political power the revealing remark: "Democracy might have survived none the less but only if the democratic value system had been firmly rooted in the soci- 19 Cf. Kosenberg, QetohichU far J>evtch6n Repvblik; Schwaras child, World in Trance; etc. a * Outstanding among these analyses is Horkheimer, ed., Studien fiber Autorit&t und FamiKe; see especially Horkheimer, "Theoretische Entwtirfe Uber Autoritat und Familie," pp. 8-76. INTRODUCTION 11 ety. . . ." 21 Erich Promm amplifies this by contending that the German workers' psychological tendencies neutralized their political tenets, thus precipitating the collapse of the socialist parties and the trade-unions. 22 The behavior of broad middle-class strata also seemed to be deter- mined by overwhelming compulsions. In a study published in 1930 I pointed out the pronounced '^white-collar" pretensions of the bulk of German employees, whose economic and social status in reality bordered on that of the workers, or was even inferior to it. 23 Although these lower middle-class people could no longer hope for bourgeois security, they scorned all doctrines and ideals more in harmony with their plight, maintaining attitudes that had lost any basis in reality. The consequence was mental f orlornness : they persisted in a kind of vacuum which added further to their psychological obduracy. The conduct of the petty bourgeoisie proper was particularly striking. Small shopkeepers, tradesmen and artisans were so full of resent- ments that they shrank from adjusting themselves. Instead of realiz- ing that it might be in their practical interest to side with democracy, they preferred, like the employees, to listen to Nazi promises. Their surrender to the Nazis was based on emotional fixations rather than on any facing of facts. Thus, behind the overt history of economic shifts, social exi- gencies and political machinations runs a secret history involving the inner dispositions of the German people. The disclosure of these dispositions through the medium of the German screen may help in the understanding of Hitler's ascent and ascendancy. 21 Neumann, Behemoth, pp. 18-19, 25. 33 Fromm, Escape from Freedom, p. 281. 33 Cf. Kracaucr, Die Angetteltten. THE ARCHAIC PERIOD (1895-1918) 1 PEACE AND WAR IT WAS only after the first World War that the German cinema really came into being. Its history up to that time was prehistory, an archaic period insignificant in itself. However, it should not be over- looked. During that period especially during the course of the war certain conditions materialized which account for the extraor- dinary power of the German film after 1918. Theoretically speaking, the German cinema commenced in 1895, when, almost two months before Lumi&re's first public performance, the Brothers Skladanovsky showed their ' fr Bioscop" in the Berlin Wintergarten bits of scenes shot and projected with apparatus they had built. 1 But this beginning was of little consequence; for until 1910 Germany had virtually no film industry of its own. Films of French, Italian and American origin among them those of Melies ingratiated themselves with the audiences of the early tent-shows (Wanderhinos) , poured into the nickelodeons (Ladenkmos) after 1900, and then passed across the screen of the primitive movie the- aters proper which slowly began to evolve. 2 One French celluloid strip of 1902, THE BEGGAR'S PKEDE, features a noble Paris beggar who, after rescuing a lady, contemptuously refuses the money she offers him, because she has previously indicted him for being a thief. 8 These films of high moral standards competed with pornographic ones which, of course, never lived up to their exciting promises. Be- tween 1906 and 1908, the films increased in length, and spoken com- ments gave way to printed titles. Owing to such improvements, these years were marked by the opening of many new theaters and the advent of German film distributors. 4 1 Olimsky, Fibmiovrttchaft, p. 20; Kalbus, Deutsche Filmkwwt, 1, 11. a Olimsky, Filmwirtschaft, p. 14; Kalbus, Deutsche Filmkunst, I, 12. a Shown by Hans Ricbter in a New York lecture, May 25, 1948. 4 Messter, Mevn Weg, p. 98; Boehmer and Reitz, Film in Wirtschaft und Recht, pp. 4-6 15 16 THE ARCHAIC PERIOD The outstanding figure among the few native producers of the period was Oskar Messter, who makes no effort in his autobiography to belittle any of his merits. Messter began working in a modest apartment studio in the Berlin Friedrichstrasse, later the headquar- ters for numerous film-makers of low caliber and questionable busi- ness ethics. He possessed the eagerness of a pioneer to experiment, to try every innovation. At a time in which close-ups were still unusual, one of his early comedies intermingled with long shots of several female cyclists a close shot of their fidgeting legs a procedure anticipating a favorite German camera usage. 6 Messter also pro- moted the fashion of "sound films." Originating in France and America, this species flourished in Germany about 19081909. A cos- tumed tenor standing before a painted canvas pretended to sing, endeavoring to synchronize the movements of his mouth with a hidden gramophone. In addition to grand-opera scenes, folk-songs and musical parodies, one could listen to Otto Reutter, the incomparable cabaret artist, whose songs cloaked bitter criticism of life with good- natured humor. Sound films of this kind had already been exhibited during the Paris World's Fair of 1900, but proved too expensive and intricate to be continued. 7 The particular interest they met with in Germany doubtless resulted from the traditional German concern with all forms of musical expression. During that whole era the film had the traits of a young street arab ; it was an uneducated creature running wild among the lower strata of society. Many people enticed by the movies had never attended artistic spectacles before ; others were lured from the stage to the screen. About 1910 the theater of the provincial town of Hildesheim reported having lost 50 per cent of those customers who previously frequented the three cheapest categories of seats. Variety and circus shows complained of similar setbacks. 8 An attraction for young workers, salesgirls, the unemployed, loafers and social non- descripts, the movie theaters were in rather bad repute. They af- forded a shelter to the poor, a refuge to sweethearts. Sometimes a crazy intellectual would stray into one. In France, the freedom of the film from cultural ties and intel- lectual prejudices enabled artists like Georges Melies or ^rnile Cohl 5 Cf. Messter, Mein Weg. e This scene is included in S. Licot's cross-section Aim, Quarante AIM de Cvntma. See also Messter, Mein Weg, p. 98. 7 Acherknecht, Lichtspielfragen, p. 151; Zaddach, Ver Uterarhche Film. pp. 14-16; Messter, Mein Weg, pp. 64-66, 78-79. 8 Zimmereimer, Filmzentur, pp. 27-28; see also Altenloh, Soxiologie PEACE AND WAR 17 to prosper, but in Germany it seems not to have stirred the cinematic sense. Then, after 1910, in response to a movement which started in France, that freedom vanished. On November 17, 1908, the newly founded French film company Film d'Art released THE ASSASSINA- TION OF THE Due DE GUISE, an ambitious creation acted by members of the Come"die Fran9aise and accompanied by a musical score of Saint-Saens. 9 This was the first of innumerable films which were to be mistaken for works of art because, spurning cinematic potentialities, they imitated the stage and adapted celebrated literary productions. Italy followed the French example, and the American screen tempo- rarily favored famous players in famous plays. The same thing happened in Germany. The upper world of stage directors, actors and writers began to show interest in the cinema after having despised it as an inferior medium. Their change of mind must be traced, in part, to the missionary zeal of Paul Davidson, the great promoter of the early German film, who, under the spell of the new Danish film actress Asta Nielsen, firmly proclaimed the cinema's artistic future. He headed the Projektion-A. G. Union, which steadily extended its ownership of movie theaters and turned to producing films of its own even before the war. To boost the movies, Davidson made contact with Max Reinhardt, the leading Berlin stage producer, and, about 1911/1912, participated in the founding of a kind of guild which was to regulate the relations be- tween film-makers and playwrights. 10 Of course, the prospect of tangible advantages did much to soften the resistance of many formerly hostile to films. Young actors from the Berlin stages were not unwilling to make a little extra money in the studios. Stage directors for their part profited by reducing the wages of these actors; moreover, they realized, not without satisfaction, that the theaters could now appeal to moviegoers anxious to adore their screen favorites in the flesh. 11 Admission of films into the realm of the officially sanctioned arts went hand in hand with the evolution of a native film industry. Dur- ing the last four prewar years, big film studios were constructed at Tempelhof and Neubabelsberg in the immediate neighborhood of Berlin, on grounds reserved to this day for the production of films studios whose removable glass walls made possible the combination 9 Bardfeche and Brasfflach, History of Motion Pictures, p. 42. 10 Boehmer and R-eitz, FUm in Wirtschaft tmd Reckt, p. 5; Davidsohn, "Wie das dcutsche LIchtspieltheater entstand," Lioht B&d B&hne, pp. 7-8; Diaz, Aita Nielten, pp. 84-85; Zaddach, Der Uterarische Film, p. 28. 11 Kalbus, Deutsche Filmkunst, I, 18. THE ARCHAIC PERIOD of indoor and outdoor work favored at the time. 12 All looked bright and promising. Max Reinhardt himself was engaged in directing motion pictures. Hugo von Hofmannsthal was writing a "dream- play," DAS FKEMDE MADCHEN (THE STRANGE Gnu,, 1913), 13 among the first of the fantastic films soon to become a German institution. From Arthur Schnitzler's comedy Liebelei to Richard Voss's obsolete middle-class novel Eva, few reputable works were being overlooked by the screen. But this elevation of the film to literary high life proved, as might be expected, a blunder. Traditionally attached to the ways of the theater, the stage people were incapable of grasping the different laws of the new cinematic medium. Their behavior towards the movies was condescending. They welcomed them as a means of emphasizing the art of the actor, and moreover, as a wonderful opportunity to popularize theatrical productions. What the screen meant to them was simply the stage again. In the summer of 1910, Reinhardt's pantomime Sumurun was made into a film which bored its audience by washing 2,000 meters on an exact duplication of the original stage performance. The so-called film reformers (Kmoreformbewegwng) 9 including teacher associations, Catholic societies and all kinds of Vereine in pursuit of cultural aims, exerted an analogous influence. From 1912 on, these pressure groups set out to justify their existence by oppos- ing the immorality of the films and denouncing them as a source of corruption of the youth. The resemblance to the American Puritan leagues is obvious. However, the German movement differed from all similar movements abroad in that it drew much delicious indigna- tion from the carelessness with which most films treated literary masterpieces. 14 It happened, in 1910, that a DON CARLOS film sup- pressed two main characters of Schiller's drama. In the eyes of the film reformers this was a crime. For any "literary" film had but one duty: to preserve the full integrity of its model. Was it for the sake of art that these spokesmen of the educated middle class shielded Schiller so ardently? Rather, classic literature enjoyed an awe- inspiring authority, and in defending it they yielded to the truly "25 Jahre Filmateller," M Jdhre Kinematograpk p. 66. 13 In all cases where a German film has been shown In the United States under an English title accepted by the trade, this title will be used In the text. If no American trade title exists, the translation appearing in parentheses is the author's own. The date given with a title always refers to the year of release. 14 For a discussion of the arty and literary-minded film and the film reformers, see Zaddach, Der Kterarisohe Film, pp. 17, 22-29, 30-38. PEACE AND WAR 19 German desire to serve the established powers. Harassing the motion picture industry with their cultured demands, the film reformers sur- vived the war and continued to stigmatize what they considered trash on the screen through numerous pamphlets, invariably couched in metaphysical terms. Fortunately, all efforts to ennoble the film by dragging it into the sphere of stage and literature aroused the scepticism of film experts and encountered the salutary indifference of the masses. The film version of Swmwrun was reproached by its audiences for a complete lack of details and close-ups offered by even the average film. Dis- couraged by such reactions, Ernst von Wolzogen, a German poet, desisted from contributing further film scenarios on the grounds that the crowd always favors the banal. People preferred to these elevated screen adaptations the current output of historical films and melo- dramas which dealt in a primitive way with popular themes. Of most films of the time only the titles and perhaps a few stills remain to us ; but it can be presumed that they somewhat resembled the exercises of a student who has not yet learned to express himself with facility. In 1913 the detective film emerged, a genre obviously inspired by the French cint-roinans, which were adopted in America during the war. 15 The first German master-detective to be serialized was Ernst Reicher as eagle-eyed Stuart Webbs, who, with the peaked cap and the inevitable shag pipe, had all the trademarks of Sherlock Holmes. Since he enjoyed an immense popularity, he was soon followed by competitors vainly trying to outdo him. They called themselves " Joe Deebs" or "Harry Higgs," were on excellent terms with Scotland Yard, and lived up to their English names by looking exactly like tailor-made gentlemen. 16 It is noteworthy that, while the French and Americans succeeded in creating a national counterpart of Conan Doyle's archetype, the Germans always conceived of the great detective as an English char- acter. This may be explained by the dependence of the classic detec- tive upon liberal democracy. He, the single-handed sleuth who makes reason destroy the spider webs of irrational powers and decency triumph over dark instincts, is the predestined hero of a civilized world which believes in the blessings of enlightenment and individual freedom. It is not accidental that the sovereign detective is disap- 15 Jahier, "42 Ans de Cin&na," Le R6le intettectuel du Cintma, p. 26. 16 Kalbus, Deutsche FUmtomst, I, 89. 20 THE ARCHAIC PERIOD pearing today in films and novels alike, giving way to the tough "private investigator" : the potentialities of liberalism seem, tempo- rarily, exhausted. Since the Germans had never developed a demo- cratic regime, they were not in a position to engender a native version of Sherlock Holmes. Their deep-founded susceptibilities to life abroad enabled them, nevertheless, to enjoy the lovely myth of the English detective. Despite the evolution of domestic production, foreign films con- tinued to flood German movie theaters, which had considerably in- creased in number since 1912. 1T A new Leipzig Lichtspiel palace was inaugurated with Quo VADIS, an Italian pageant that actually re- ceived press reviews as if it were a real stage play. 18 Towards the end of the prewar period, the Danish films gained more and more influ- ence. Greatly indebted to Asta Nielsen, they appealed to German audiences by focusing upon psychological conflicts unfolded in natural settings. The success of the American Westerns was par- ticularly sweeping. Broncho Bill and Tom Mix conquered the hearts of the young German generation, which had devoured, volume after volume, the novels of Karl May novels set in an imaginary Far West and full of fabulous events involving Indian tribes, covered wagons, traders, hunters, tramps and adventurers. To staid and settled adults the spell this shoddy stuff exerted on boys in the early teens was inexplicable ; but youngsters would shed tears of delight when the noble Indian chief Winnetou, having become a Christian, died in the arms of his friend Old Shatterhand, a righter of wrongs, and a German, of course. By their simple manner and untroubled outlook, their ceaseless activity and heroic exploits, the American screen cowboys also attracted many German intellectuals suffering from lack of purpose. Because they were mentally tossed about, the intelligentsia welcomed the simplifications of the Westerns, the life in which the hero has but one course to fallow. In the same fashion, at the outbreak of the war, numerous students enthusiastically rushed to volunteer in the army. They were drawn not so much by patriotism as by a passionate desire to escape from vain freedom into a life under compelling pressure. They wished to serve. Besides the Westerns, short comedies featuring Max Linder, Fatty and Tontolini were the vogue of those years. All strata of Ger- 17 Jason, "Zahlen sefaen uns an," 25 Jahre Kiwmato graph, p. 67. Olimskf, miafiwirtsck&ft, p. 21. PEACE AND WAR 21 man moviegoers participated in the gay laughter they aroused. The Germans liked that sort of visual fun. It is all the more surprising, therefore, that they themselves were incapable of producing a popu- lar film comedian. As early as 1921, a German writer stated plainly that the Germans were short of comical film ideas a domain which, he admitted, the French and after them the Americans had learned to explore with mastery. 19 This strange deficiency may be connected with the character of the old screen buffooneries. Whether or not they indulged in slap- stick, they invariably exposed their hero to all kinds of pitfalls and dangers, so that he depended upon one lucky accident after another to escape. When he crossed a railroad, a train would approach, threatening to crush him, and only in the very last moment would his life be spared as the train switched over to a track hitherto in- visible. The hero a sweet, rather helpless individual who would never harm anyone pulled through in a world governed by chance. The comedy adjusted itself in this way to the specific conditions of the screen ; for more than any other medium the film is able to point up the contingencies of life. It was a truly cinematic type of comedy. Had it a moral to impart? It sided with the little pigs against the big bad wolf by making luck the natural ally of its heroes. This, inciden- tally, was comforting to the poor. That such comedy founded on chance and a naive desire for happiness should prove inaccessible to the Germans arises from their traditional ideology, which tends to discredit the notion of luck in favor of that of fate. The Germans have developed a native humor that holds wit and irony in con- tempt and has no place for happy-go-lucky figures. Theirs is an emo- tional humor which tries to reconcile mankind to its tragic plight and to make one not only laugh at the oddities of life but also realize through that laughter how fateful it is. Such dispositions were of course incompatible with the attitudes underlying the performances of a Buster Keaton or Harold Lloyd. There exists, moreover, a close interrelationship between intellectual habits and bodily movements. The German actors may have felt that, owing to their credos, they were hardly the type for gags and gestures similar to those of the American film comedians* The war began. Not only part of the German youth, but also the clan of the film reformers firmly believed that it would imbue their Mollhausen, "Aufstieg des Films," Ufa-BWter. 22 THE ARCHAIC PERIOD drab life with a new and marvelous meaning. Hermann Hafker's preface to his book on the cinema and the cultured classes is illum- inating in tils respect. Dated September 1914, it extols the war as a sure means of realizing the noble designs of the film reformers, and finally turns into one of those bellicose dithyrambs not at all unusual then. "May it [i.e., the war] purify our public life as a thunderstorm does the atmosphere. May it allow us to live again, and make us eager to risk our lives in deeds such as this hour commands. Peace had become insupportable." 20 Hafker and his like were in a frenzy. Peace, to be sure, had seen the German film industry caught in a crisis. The domestic output was far too insignificant to compete with the foreign films crowding the movie theaters, which had seemed to increase for the sole purpose of absorbing the influx from abroad. Products of Path Freres and Gaumont inundated the German market. The Danish Nordisk went to the limit to ruin Davidson's Projektion-A.G. Union. 21 This embarrassing situation was reversed by the war, which abruptly freed the native industry from the burden of foreign com- petition. After the frontiers had been shut, Germany belonged to the German film producers, faced now with the task of satisfying on their own all internal demands. These were immense. In addition to the regular movie theaters numerous military ones spreading behind the front lines demanded a permanent supply of fresh films. It was lucky for the film-makers that just before the war large and modern studio plants had been completed. A boom set in, and new film com- panies cropped up with incredible speed. According to a seemingly reliable survey, the number of these companies rose from 28 in 1913 to 245 in 1919. Movie theaters also flourished and grew more and more luxurious. It was a period of abundant dividends. The middle class began to pay some attention to the cinema. 22 Thus the German film was offered a unique chance: it became autonomous ; it no longer needed to emulate foreign products to sus- tain its market value. One would think that under such auspicious circumstances Germany might have succeeded in creating a cinema of her own, of truly national character. Other countries did. During 20 HMker, 1>er Ktoo vnd die Oebildeten, p. 4. "Boehmer and Reitz, Film in Wirtschaft und RecJit, p. 5; Kalbus. Deutsche FUmkunst, I, 28. 32 Boehmer and Reitz, Film in WirUehaft und Recht, pp. 6-Gj Olimsky, Fiknwirt- ackaft, pp. 28-24; Jason, "Zahlen schen Tins an," 8 Jdhre Kinevnatograph, p. 67; Bardfeche and Brasillach, History of Motion Pictures, pp. PEACE AND WAR 23 those war years, D. W. Griffith, Chaplin and Cecil B. De Mille devel- oped the American film, and the Swedish industry took shape. But the German evolution was not similar. From October 1914 on, Messter substituted for the prewar newsreels of Path Freres, Gaumont and Eclair weekly film reports which pictured diverse war events with the help of documentary shots. Disseminated among the neutrals as well as in the fatherland, these illustrated bulletins were supplemented by staged propaganda films in which extras put into British uniforms surrendered to valiant German troops. The govern- ment encouraged efforts of that kind as a means to make people "stick to it." Later in the course of the war the High Command ordered selected cameramen to participate in military actions. The design was to obtain impressive pictorial material which would also serve as an historic record. One reel which was taken from a sub- marine, and closely 'detailed the sinking of Allied ships, gained a wide reputation. 23 But these cinematic activities were by no means peculiar to the Germans. The French had nearly the same ideas about the utility of war documentaries, and realized them with no less determination. 24 In the domain of the fictional film, scores of patriotic dramas, melodramas, comedies and farces spread over the screen rubbish filled to the brim with war brides, waving flags, officers, privates, ele- vated sentiments and barracks humor. When, about the middle of 1915, it became obvious that the gay war of movement had changed into a stationary war of uncertain issues, the moviegoers apparently refused to swallow the patriotic sweets any longer. A marked shift in entertainment themes occurred. The many pictures exploiting patriotism were superseded by films which concentrated upon peace- time subjects. By resuming part of their normal interests, people adjusted themselves to the stabilized war. A multitude of comedies emerged, transferring to the screen popular Berlin stage comedians in proved theatrical plays. They laid hold of such stereotyped figures as the Prussian lieutenant or the adolescent girl, and, in the main, indulged in wanton sex fun. Ernst Lubitsch started his amazing career in the field of these slight com- edies. Not content with minor stage roles in classic dramas, he, the Reinhardt actor, found an outlet for his nimble wit and ingenuity by 33 Rohde, "German Propaganda Movies 9 " American Cinematographer, Jan. 1948, p. 10; Ackerknecht, Liohtspielfragen, pp. 21-22; Messter, Mein W&g, pp. 128-80. 24 Bardeche and Brasillach, History of Motion Pictures, p. 98. 24 THE ARCHAIC PERIOD playing the comic in screen farces. One of them features him as a Jewish apprentice in a Berlin shop who, always on the verge of being fired, ends as the son-in-law of his boss. He soon took pleasure in directing, himself, such one-reel comedies. Although, under the Nazis, Kalbus denounced Lubitsch for displaying "a pertness entirely alien from our true being," the contemporary German audience did not feel at all scandalized, but enjoyed the actor and his films whole- heartedly. 25 The war failed to provoke vital innovations, nor did it engender additional film types, with the exception, perhaps, of a group of cheap serials promoting favorite actors such as Fern Andra and Erna Morena. 2ff The German film-makers continued to explore mines opened by prewar activities, and, at best, played new variations on old tunes. Occasionally, a sure instinct seized upon a story that later would be picked up again and again. Sudermann's outmoded novels and theatrically effective plays were first translated to the screen during that period. 27 They were full of dramatic suspense, good roles and a bourgeois outlook, abounded in realistic details, and rendered the melancholy East Prussian landscape painstakingly qualities which made them attractive to film producers for many years to come. Only towards the end of the war did the events take place that caused the birth of the German film proper, but that they proved so effective was due to the whole development prior to their interven- tion. Although this development lacked strong impulses and striking results, it nevertheless established traditions that facilitated the final breakthrough. The decisive contribution of the war and prewar years was the preparation of a generation of actors, cameramen, directors and technicians for the tasks of the future. Some of these old-timers con- tinued under Hitler ; among them was Carl Froelich, a pre-eminent German director who did not mind occupying a key post in the Nazi film industry. He entered one of the first Messter studios as an elec- trician, then cranked a camera, and, as early as 1911 or 1912, began directing films. 28 Many others gained practice by making primitive 25 Kalbus, Deutsche Filmkunat, I, &4. Kalbus deals extensively with the German war output; cf. pp. 18-19, 82-87. 26 76i&, pp. 25-26. 27 Zaddach, JD*r Uteraritche Film, p. 84. 88 Messter, Mein Weg, pp. 57, 99 ff. PEACE AND WAK 25 films long since passed into oblivion. They learned by their own mistakes. Emil Jannings he, too, subsequently prominent in Nazi Germany writes about his debut as a film actor during the war: "When I watched myself for the first time on the screen, the impres- sion was crushing. Did I really look as stupid as that?" 29 Jannings was only one of numerous actors who underwent their basic training in the course of the archaic period. They all were later to build up a sort of repertory company. Indeed, the cast of every film to be released in Germany would include members of this "guild," which, in spite of continually acquiring new recruits, kept its old guard intact. While Hollywood cultivates stars rather than ensemble effects, and the Russian cinema often uses laymen as film figures, the German film is. founded upon a permanent body of players highly disciplined professionals who adjust themselves to all changes in style and fashion. 80 To meet actors familiar to contemporary moviegoers in a past that has become history is an uncanny experience : what was once our life is now stored away, and we have somehow unknowingly moved on. Not the predecessors of Werner Krauss or Albert Bassermann, but they themselves passed across the screen during the first World War figures irrevocably separated from the present day. One of their companions was Henny Porten who she was a rare exception began her film career without any previous stage experience. From about 1910 on, this ingenious blonde, much praised as the ideal type of German woman, maintained herself in the favor of the public, playing with equal ease comic and tragic parts, vulgar farmer's wives and sensitive ladies. 81 Another figure of those early days was Harry Piel, called the German Douglas Fairbanks. He appeared in the middle of the war as the hero of UNTEB. HEISSER SONNE (UNDER A HOT STJN), a film in which he forced several lions (from Hamburg's Hagenbeck Zoo) to yield to his spell. 82 From the very beginning Piel seems to have been true to the type he was to impersonate in the future: that of a chivalrous daredevil who excels in defeating re- 38 Jannings, "Mein Werdegang," UforMagmfa, Oct. 1-7, 1926. 30 C. A. Lejeune, the English film writer, comments on this ppint in an interesting way. The German repertory company, she says, "is right for the mood of Germany, and will always be the type for any segment of cinema that works from the psychological- fantastic basis, any production that builds up a whole from the materials of the studio rather than cleaving out a meaning from the raw materials of life." Lejeune, Cinema, p. 142. 31 Kalbus, Deutsche FUmkwwt, I, Ibid., pp. 89-00. 26 THE ARCHAIC PERIOD sourceful criminals and rescuing innocent maidens. When he showed up in evening attire, he epitomized an immature girl's daydream of a perfect gentleman, and the boyish charm he radiated was as sweet as the colored sugar-sticks which, in European fairs, are the delight of children and blase aesthetes. His films were in the black-and-white style of the dime novels rather than the shadings of psychological conflicts; they superseded tragic issues with happy endings, and, on the whole, presented a German variation of the Anglo-American thriller. This bright and pleasing trash stands isolated against a mass of somber "artistic" products. The most fascinating personality of the primitive era was the Danish actress Asta Nielsen. In 1910, after years of stage triumphs, she made her screen debut in AFGRTTNDEN ( ABYSS), a Copenhagen Nordist film directed by her husband, Urban Gad. This film, distin- guished by a length which was then unusual, has left no trace other than an enthusiastic comment on some footage devoted to her panto- mime a s ig n that she must have been predestined for the cinema. Convinced of her future, Paul Davidson offered Asta Nielsen fabu- lous salaries and working conditions if she would agree to put her gifts at the disposal of his film company, Union. She agreed, settled in Berlin, and there, about 1911, began to appear in films which during the war stirred French as well as German soldiers to adorn their dugouts with her photograph. What they obscurely felt, Guil- laume Apollinaire expressed in a torrent of words: "She is all! She is the vision of the drinker and the dream of the lonely man. She laughs like a girl completely happy, and her eye knows of things so tender and shy that one could not speak of them," and so forth. This exceptional artist enriched the German film in more than one way. At a time when most actors still clung to stage devices, Asta Nielsen developed an innate film sense which could not but inspire her partners. Her knowledge of how to produce a definite psycho- logical effect by means of an adequately chosen dress was as pro- found as her insight into the cinematic impact of details. Diaz, her early biographer, wondered at the confusion of futile objects piled up in her home a collection including semielegant articles of men's clothing, optical instruments, little walking sticks, distorted hats and impossible wrappers. "What I am playing," she told him, "I am throughout. And I like to form so detailed an idea of my characters that I know them down to the last externals, which consist precisely of all these many bagatelles. Such bagatelles are more revealing than PEACE AND WAR 27 obtrusive exaggerations. I really build up my characters and here you find the most decorative, most effective elements of which to com- pose the facade." The German screen world would be incomplete without the characters Asta Nielsen created during the silent era, 88 33 Diaz, Asia Nielsen, p. 61. For the Apollinaire quotation, see Diaz, p. 7. See also Mollhausen, "Aufstieg des Films," Ufct-BWtter; Kalbus, Deutsche Filmkuntrt, I, 15. 2, FOREBODINGS FROM the junk heap of archaic films four call for special attention because they anticipated important postwar subjects. Three of them mirrored fantastic worlds full of chimerical creatures; this was in harmony with the progressive German film theories of the time. Many a contemporary writer encouraged the film-makers to substan- tiate the specific possibilities of their medium by rendering not so much existing objects as products of pure imagination. Hermann Hafker he who praised war as the salvation from the evils of peace advised film poets to interweave real and unreal elements. The war enthusiast fond of fairy tales : it was a truly German phenom- enon. Similarly, Georg Lukacs, who was later to change from a bourgeois aesthete into a Marxist thinker (going to the extreme in both cases), wrote in 1913 that he considered the film tantamount to the fairy tale and the dream. 1 The first to put in practice the doctrines of his contemporaries was Paul Wegener, a Reinhardt actor whose Mongolian face told of the strange visions that haunted him. 2 His desire to represent them on the screen resulted in films that were true innovations. They swept into regions ruled by .other laws than ours; they rendered events which only the film could make seem real. Wegener was animated by the same cinematic passion which had inspired Georges Mlies to make such films as A TBIP TO THE MOON and THE MERRY FROLICS or SATAN. But while the amiable French artist enchanted all childlike souls with his bright conjuring tricks, the German actor proved a sinister magician calling up the demoniac forces of human nature. Wegener started, as early as 1913, with DER STUDENT VON PRAG (THE STUDENT ov PRAGUE), a pioneer work also in that it inaugu- rated the exploitation of old legends. Harms Heinz Ewers who wrote 1 Of. Pordes, Dot Lichtapiel, p. 10. a Mack, Wie komme ich zum Film?, p. 114. 28 FOREBODINGS 29 the script, in collaboration with Wegener himself, possessed a real film sense. He had the good fortune to be a bad author with an imagination reveling in gross sensation and sex a natural ally for the Nazis, for whom he was to write, in 1933, the official screen play on Horst Wessel. But precisely this kind of imagination forced him into spheres rich in tangible events and sensual experiences always good screen material. Borrowing from E. T. A. Hoffmann, the Faust legend and Foe's story ''William Wilson," Ewers presents us with the poor student Baldwin signing a compact with the queer sorcerer Scapinelli. This incarnation of Satan promises Baldwin an advantageous marriage and inexhaustible wealth on condition that he, Scapinelli, be given the student's mirror reflection. It was a brilliant film idea to have the reflection, lured out of the looking-glass by the wizard, transform itself into an independent person. According to the terms of the com- pact, Baldwin meets a beautiful countess and falls in love with her; whereupon her official suitor challenges him. A duel is inevitable. At the demand of the countess* father, the student, who is reputed to be an excellent fencer, agrees to spare the life of his adversary. But as Baldwin hurries to the rendezvous having been prevented by Scap- indli's machinations from reaching it at the appointed time he learns that his ghostly counterpart has supplanted him and slain the unhappy suitor. Baldwin is disgraced. He tries to convince the countess of his innocence ; but all attempts at rehabilitating himself are ruthlessly frustrated by his double. Obviously the double is noth- ing more than a projection of one of the two souls inhabiting Bald- win. The greedy self that makes him succumb to devilish tempta- tions assumes a life of its own and sets out to destroy the other and better self he has betrayed. At the end the desperate student shoots his reflection in the same attic from which he once emerged. The shot fired at the apparition kills only himself. Then Scapinelli enters and tears the compact; its pieces drop down and cover Baldwin's corpse. 8 The cinematic novelty of THE STUDENT OF PRAGUE seems to have stirred contemporaries. One critic compared it with paintings of Ribera a praise that was to be crudely reversed by a reviewer who, on the occasion of a revival in 1926, called the film "incredibly naive 3 Of. Ewers, Der Student von Pray; Kalbus, Deutsche Fttmkunst, I, 17; Wesse, Qrostmaoht Film, p. 125 ff. For Stellan Rye, the director of the film, see CobSken, "Als ich noch rund um die Friedrichstrasse ging . . ," $$ John Kimmatograph, p. )8. 80 THE ARCHAIC PERIOD and often ridiculous." 4 The film belongs among the many lost ones. Much as this may be regretted, its significance undoubtedly rests less on the camera-work than on the story proper, which despite all its Anglo-American affiliations attracted the Germans as irresistibly as if it had been exclusively drawn from native sources. THE STUDENT OP PRAGUE introduced to the screen a theme that was to become an obsession of the German cinema: a deep and fear- ful concern with the foundations of the self. By separating Baldwin from his reflection and making both face each other, Wegener's film symbolizes a specific kind of split personality. Instead of being unaware of his own duality, the panic-stricken Baldwin realizes that he is in the grip of an antagonist who is nobody but himself. This was an old motif surrounded by a halo of meanings, but was it not also a dreamlike transcription of what the German middle class actually experienced in its relation to the feudal caste run- ning Germany? The opposition of the bourgeoisie to the Imperial regime grew, at times, sufficiently acute to overshadow its hostility towards the workers, who shared the general indignation over the semi-absolutist institutions in Prussia, the encroachments of the mili- tary set and the foolish doings of the Kaiser. The current phrase, "the two Germanys," applied in particular to the differences between the ruling set and the middle class differences deeply resented by the latter. Yet notwithstanding this dualism the Imperial govern- ment stood for economic and political principles which even the liberals were not unwilling to accept. Face to face with their con- science they had to admit that they identified themselves with the very ruling class they opposed. They represented both Germanys. The determination with which THE STUDENT OF PRAGUE treats its horror story as a case of individual psychology is also revealing. The whole external action is merely a mirage reflecting the events in Baldwin's soul. Baldwin is not part of the world; the world is contained in Baldwin. To depict him thus, nothing was more appro- priate than to locate the play in a fantastic sphere where the de- mands of social reality did not have to be considered. This explains, in part, the predilection of the German postwar cinema for imagi- nary subjects. The cosmic significance attributed to Baldwin's in- terior life reflects the profound aversion of all German middle-class 4 Seeber, "Szenen aus dem Film mefnes Lebens," Lioht BUd BtikM, p. 16, The quotation comes from the Hanover newspaper, VolkiwiUe, Winter 1926-1927 (clipping in the possession of Mr. Henrik Galeen, New York). FOREBODINGS SI strata to relating their mental dilemma to their ambiguous social plight. They shrank from tracing ideas or psychological experiences to economic and social causes after the fashion of the socialists. Founded upon the idealist concept of the autonomous individual, their attitude was in perfect harmony with their practical interests. Since any concession to the materialist thinking of the socialists might have undermined these interests, they instinctively avoided one by exaggerating the autonomy of the individual. This led them to conceive outer duplicities as inner dualities, but they preferred such psychological complications to issues involving a loss of their privileges. Nevertheless they seem to have sometimes doubted whether their retreat into the depth of the soul would save them from a catastrophic breakthrough of social reality. Baldwin's ultimate sui- cide mirrors their premonitions. Wegener produced his second film, DEB GOLEM (THE GOLEM; like his first film, remade after the war), with the assistance of Henrik Galeen, an imaginative artist who wrote the script, directed the film and also played a role in it. Released at the beginning of 1915, the film exemplified anew Wegener's genuine passion for drawing screen effects from fantastic themes. This time the legend behind the film was the medieval Jewish one in which Rabbi Loew of Prague infuses life into a Golem a statue he had made of clay by putting a magic sign on its heart. In the film, workmen digging a well in an old synagogue excavate the statue and take it to an antique dealer. The dealer subsequently comes upon a report on Rabbi Loew's procedures in some cabalistic volume, and, following its directions, he achieves the miraculous metamorphosis. Now the story turns to modern psychology. While the Golem functions as the dealer's servant, a second transformation occurs : he, the dull robot, falls in love with the daughter of his master and thus changes into a human being with a soul of his own. The frightened girl tries to escape her eerie suitor, whereupon he realizes his terrible isolation. This rouses him to fury. A raging monster, he pursues the daughter, blindly destroying all obstacles in his way. At the end he perishes by falling from a tower; his corpse is the shattered statue of clay. 5 The motifs of THE GOLEM reappear in HOMUNCTJLUS (j.916), a thriller in six parts which enjoyed an enormous success during 5 Based on information offered by Mr. Henrik Galeen. For Wegener's other films, see Kalbus, Deutsche Fttmkvnst, I, 68, and Zaddach, Der literarische Film, p. 86. 32 THE ARCHAIC PERIOD the war. Its title role was taken by the popular Danish actor Olaf F0nss, whose romantic attire in the film reportedly influenced the fashions of elegant Berlin. Since this serial, an early forerunner of the Frankenstein films, sprang from quite other sources than Wegener's screen legend THE GOLEM, the analogies between the two movies are particularly striking. Like the Golem, Homunculus is an artificial product. Generated in a retort by the famous scientist Professor Hansen and his assistant, Eodin, he develops into a man of sparkling intellect and indomitable will. However, no sooner does he learn the secret of his birth than he behaves as the Golem had. Homunculus is a Golem figure in the sphere of consciousness. He feels like an outcast and yearns for love to rid himself of his fatal loneliness. This overpower- ing desire drives him to far countries where he expects his secret to be safe, but the truth leaks out, and whatever he does to conquer their hearts, people recoil in horror, saying: "It is Homunculus, the man without a soul, the devil's servant a monster!" When they happen to kill his dog, even Rodin, his sole friend, cannot keep the deluded Homunculus from despising all mankind. In elaborating his further career, the film foreshadows Hitler surprisingly. Ob- sessed by hatred, Homunculus makes himself the dictator of a large country, and then sets out to take unheard-of revenge for his suffer- ings. Disguised as a worker, he incites riots which give him, the dictator, an opportunity to crush the masses ruthlessly. Finally he precipitates a world war. His monstrous existence is cut short by nothing less than a thunderbolt. 6 Both HOMUNCULUS and THE GOLEM portray characters whose abnormal traits are presented as the result of abnormal origins. But the postulate of such origins is actually a poetic subterfuge rationalizing the seemingly inexplicable fact that these heroes are, or feel themselves to be, different from their fellow creatures. What makes them so different? Homunculus formulates the reason of which the Golem is only obscurely aware: "I am cheated out of the greatest thing life has to offer!" He hints at his inability to offer and receive love a defect which cannot but give him a strong feel- ing of inferiority. At about the time HOMUNCULUS appeared, the German philosopher Max Scheler lectured in public meetings on the causes of the hatred which Germany aroused everywhere in the 8 Cf. F0nss, Kriff t Suit Off Fflm. See also note on the film in Museum of Modern Art Library, clipping files. FOREBODINGS S3 world. The Germans resembled Homunculus: they themselves had an inferiority complex, due to an historic development which proved detrimental to the self-confidence of the middle class. Unlike the English and the French, the Germans had failed to achieve their revolution and, in consequence, never succeeded in establishing a truly democratic society. Significantly, German literature offers not a single work penetrating an articulated social whole after the manner of Balzac or Dickens. No social whole existed in Germany. The middle-class strata were in a state of political immaturity against which they dreaded to struggle lest they further endanger their already insecure social condition. This retrogressive conduct provoked a psychological stagnation. Their habit of nurturing the intimately associated sensations of inferiority and isolation was as juvenile as their inclination to revel in dreams of the future. The two artificial screen figures react to frustration in a similar way. In the case of Homunculus the impulses prompting him to action are quite obvious. He combines lust for destruction with sado- masochistic tendencies manifesting themselves in his wavering be- tween humble submission and revengeful violence. Rodin's much- stressed friendship with him adds a touch of homosexuality that rounds out the picture. Modern psychoanalysis is undoubtedly justi- fied in interpreting these perversions as means of escape from the specific suffering Homunculus undergoes. That both films dwell upon such outlets reveals a strong predisposition on the part of the Germans to utilize them. Having gone berserk, the Golem and Homunculus die deaths as remote from the normal as their origins. That of Homunculus is strictly supernatural, although he might well have been killed by an act of revenge or justice. Isolating him definitely from the rest of humanity, his end testifies not only, as did THE STUDENT OP PRAGUE, to the desire of the middle-class German to exalt his in- dependence of social exigencies, but also to his pride in this self- chosen isolation. Like Baldwin's suicide, the deaths of both monsters betray gloomy forebodings. The fourth archaic film denoting psychological unrest was DEB ANDERE (THE OTHER), a realistic counterpart of the three fan- tasies. Released in 1913, it was based on Paul Lindau's stage play of the same title, which dramatized a Dr. Jekyll-and-Mr. Hyde case, drawing it into a stuffy bourgeois atmosphere. The Dr. Jekyll is 84 THE ARCHAIC PERIOD here an enlightened Berlin lawyer, Dr. Hallers, who, during a house party, smiles sceptically at an account of a split personality. Noth- ing of that kind, he contends, can ever happen to him. But, over- worked, Hallers falls from a horse, and, as a consequence, becomes in- creasingly often the victim of a compulsory sleep from which he emerges as "the other." This other self of his, a rogue, joins a bur- glar to break into the lawyer's own flat. The police interfere, arrest- ing the burglar. While they examine him, his accomplice falls asleep and awakes as Dr. Hallers a Hallers completely unconscious of his participation in the crime. He collapses after being forced to identify himself as the burglar's partner. The story has a happy ending. Hallers regains his health and gets married: the prototype of a citizen immune to all psychological disturbances. 7 Hallers 5 adventure intimates that anyone can fall prey to men- tal disintegration like Baldwin, and thereby become an outcast like Homunculus. Now, Hallers is defined as a middle-class German. Owing to his spiritual kinship with the fantastic figures of the other films, it seems all the more justifiable to consider them middle-class representatives as well. Instead of elaborating on this kinship, THE OTHER treats it as a temporary one. Hallers 7 disintegration appears as a curable disease, and far from ending tragically, he returns to the calm haven of normal life. This difference must be laid to a change of perspective. While the fantastic films spontaneously re- flect certain attitudes symptomatic of collective uneasiness, THE OTHER approaches the same attitudes from the standpoint of banal middle-class optimism. Guided by this optimism, the story minimizes the existing uneasiness, and, in consequence, symbolizes it through an ephemeral accident which cannot invalidate confidence in ever- lasting security. 7 Publicity program for the film; Kalbus, Deutsche FilmkwMt, I, U. The part of Dr. Hallers was Albert Bassermann's first film role. 3, GENESIS OF UFA THE birth of the German film proper resulted in part from organi- zational measures taken by the German authorities. These measures must be traced to two observations all informed Germans were in a position to make during World War I. First, they became increas- ingly aware of the influence anti-German films exerted everywhere abroad a fact which startled them all the more as they themselves had not yet realized the immense suggestive power inherent in this medium. Second, they recognized the insufficiency of the domestic output. To satisfy the enormous demands, incompetent producers had flooded the market with films which proved inferior in quality to the bulk of foreign pictures 1 ; moreover, the German film had not been animated by the propagandists zeal that those of the Allies evinced. Aware of this dangerous situation, the German authorities tried to change it by intervening directly in the production of motion pictures. In 1916 the government, with the support of associations promoting economic, political and cultural objectives, founded Deulig (Deutsche Lichtspiel-Gesellschaft), a film company which, through appropriate documentary films, was to publicize the father- land at home and abroad. 2 At the beginning of 1917, there followed the establishment of Bufa (BUd- und Fflmamt) ; set up purely as a government agency, it supplied the troops at the front with movie theaters and also assumed the task of providing those documentaries which recorded military activities. 3 This was something, but not enough. When after the entrance of the United States into the war American movies swept over the world, impressing hatred of Germany with an unrivaled force upon 1 Boehmer and Reitz, Film in Wirtschaft wid Recht, p. 6. a Ibid., p. 6; Kalbus, Deutsche Filmkvnst, I, 42. 3 Kalbus, ibid., p. 44; Bardfeche and Brasillach, History of Motion Pictures, p. 135. 35 S6 THE ARCHAIC PERIOD enemies and neutrals alike, leading German circles agreed that only an organization of tremendous proportions would be able to coun- teract that campaign. The omnipotent General Ludendorff himself took the initiative by recommending a merger of the main film com- panies, so that their scattered energies might be channeled in the national interest. His suggestions were orders. On the strength of a resolution adopted in November 1917 by the German High Com- mand in close touch with prominent financiers, industrialists and shipowners, Messter Film, Davidson's Union and the companies con- trolled by Nordisk with backing from a group of banks merged into a new enterprise: Ufa (Universum Film A. 6?.). Its stock of shares amounted to about 25 million marks, of which the Reich took over one-third, i.e., 8 million. The official mission of Ufa was to advertise Germany according to government directives. These asked not only for direct screen propaganda, but also for films charac- teristic of German culture and films serving the purpose of national education. 4 To attain its aims, Ufa had to raise the level of domestic pro- duction, because only films of high standards could be expected to compete with, let alone outstrip, foreign achievements in effective propaganda. Animated by this interest, Ufa assembled a team of talented producers, artists and technicians, and organized the studio work with that thoroughness upon which the success of any propa- gandistic campaign depends. In addition, Ufa had to sell its goods. Conscious of this task, it began to infiltrate the occupied Ukraine as early as March 1918. 8 In its effort to make the German film a propaganda weapon, the government had not reckoned with defeat and revolution. How- ever, the events of November left this weapon intact, except, of course, for Bufa which, as a residue of the Imperial administration, was dissolved at the end of 1918. In the case of Ufa, a transfer of property took place: the Reich renounced its partnership, and the Deutsche Bank began to acquire most of the shares, including those of Nordisk. 6 Yet this economic shift did not imply a change of conduct. Since the new masters of Ufa scarcely differed from the *Jdhrbvc1i der Filmindustrl*, 1922/8, p. 26, and 1928/25, p. 12; Neumann, Film- "Kunst", pp. 86-57 j Olimsky, Filmarirttchaft, p. 24; Vincent, JBittoire de VArt C\nt~ matographique, p. 189. tJahrbvch dor FiMnduttrie, 1922/8, p. 27; Jacobs, American Film, p. 808. Neumann, Ftim-"S:wi*t", pp. 86-37; Jahrbvch tor Filmindwtrie, 1922/8, p. 28, and 1928/25, p. 12. GENESIS OF UFA S7 old ones, they were inclined to perpetuate on the screen the con- servative and nationalist pattern set by the former regime. Only a slight retouching was desirable: in view of the actual domestic situa- tion the films to be promoted would have to make it absolutely clear that the Germany of which Ufa dreamed was by no means identical with the Germany of the socialists. Owing to Ufa's transformation into a private company, its con- cern with propaganda was somewhat overshadowed by purely com- mercial considerations, especially those of export. But export was of propagandistic use, too, and precisely in the interest of economic expansion there now remained, as before, the task of perfecting the German film, so that it might be forced upon a world utterly dis- inclined to accept any such contribution. German postwar films en- countered a stiff international boycott calculated to last several years. To run this blockade, Ufa began immediately after the war to secure rights to movie theaters in Switzerland, Scandinavia, Hol- land, Spain and other neutral countries. Deulig, which like Ufa continued working under the Republic, adopted the same policy by building up contacts in the Balkans. 7 The genesis of Ufa testifies to the authoritarian character of Imperial Germany. Although, in wartime, the authorities of all belligerent countries assume virtually unlimited powers, the use they can make of these powers is not everywhere the same. When the German war lords ordered the foundation of Ufa, they initiated activities which in democracies result from the pressure of public opinion. Manipulated as this opinion may be, it preserves a certain spontaneity which no democratic government can afford to disre- gard. After America's entrance into the war, anti-German films were officially encouraged, but the administration relied on existing emotional trends. 8 These films expressed what the people actually felt. No such consideration for popular sentiments influenced deci- sions in favor of a similar screen campaign in Germany. Dictated by the necessities of the war, they were based exclusively upon the arguments of experts. The German authorities took it for granted that public opinion could be molded into any pattern they desired. Symptomatically, the Germans were so accustomed to an authoritive handling of their affairs that they believed the enemy screen propa- ganda also to be the outcome of mere government planning. i Kalbus, Deutsche Filmkunst, I, 42. 8 Jacobs, American Film, p. 258 ff. 38 THE ARCHAIC PERIOD Any framework of organizational measures has to be filled out with life. The birth of the German film originated not only in the foundation of Ufa, but also in the intellectual excitement surging through Germany after the war. All Germans were then in a mood which can best be defined by the word Aufbruch. In the pregnant sense in which it was used at the time, the term meant departure from the shattered world of yesterday towards a tomorrow built on the grounds of revolutionary conceptions. This explains why, as in Russia, expressionist art became popular in Germany during that period. 9 People suddenly grasped the significance of avant-garde paintings and mirrored themselves in visionary dramas announcing to a suicidal mankind the gospel of a new age of brotherhood. Intoxicated by such prospects, which now seemed within reach, intellectuals, students, artists and whoever felt the call set out to solve all political, social and economic problems with equal ease. They read Capital or quoted Marx without having read him ; they believed in international socialism, pacifism, collectivism, aristocratic leadership, religious community life or national resurrection, and frequently presented a confused mixture of these variegated ideals as a brand-new creed. But whatever they advocated seemed to them a universal remedy for all evils, particularly in cases in which they owed their discovery to inspiration rather than knowledge. When in a meeting after the Armistice Max Weber, the great scholar and German democrat, criticized the humiliating peace conditions which the Allies had in store, a sculptor of local reputation shouted: "Ger- many should let the other nations crucify her for the sake of the world!" The eagerness with which the sculptor jumped into this Dostoievsky-like declaration was quite symptomatic. Innumerable manifestoes and programs spread all over Germany, and the smallest meeting room resounded with the roar of heated discussion. It was one of those rare moments in which the soul of a whole people over- flows its traditional bounds. In the wake of this uproarious Awfbruck the last prejudices against the cinema melted away. Even more important, the cinema attracted creative energies which longed for an opportunity to ex- press adequately the new hopes and fears of which the era was full. Young writers and painters just back from the war approached the film studios, animated, like the rest of their generation, by the desire to commune with the people. To them the screen was more than a 9 Kurtz, JSxprMsionitmus, p. 61. GENESIS OF UFA 39 medium rich in unexplored possibilities; it was a unique means of imparting messages to the masses. Of course, the film producers and big executives interfered with such upward flights, engineering all kinds of compromises. But even so this postwar effervescence en- riched the German screen with singular content and a language of its own. THE POSTWAR PERIOD (1918-1924) 4 THE SHOCK OF FREEDOM To call the events of November 1918 a revolution would be abusing the term. There was no revolution in Germany. What really took place was the breakdown of those in command, resulting from a hopeless military situation and a sailors' revolt which gained mo- mentum only because people were sick of the war. The Social Democrats who took over were so unprepared for a revolution that they originally did not even think of establishing a German Repub- lic. Its proclamation was improvised. 1 These leaders, in whom Lenin had placed such hope, proved incapable of removing the big land- owners, the industrialists, the generals, the judiciary. Instead of creating a people's army, they relied on the antidemocratic Freikorps formations to crush Spartacus. On January 15, 1919, Freikorps officers murdered Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht a crime soon to be followed by the series of notorious JFemtf-murders, not one of which was ever punished. After the first weeks of the new Re- public the old ruling classes began to re-establish themselves. Except for a few social reforms not much had been changed. 2 However, the sweep of intellectual excitement accompanying even this abortive revolution reveals the cataclysm Germany en- dured after the collapse of the old hierarchy of values and con- ventions. For a brief while the German mind had a unique oppor- tunity to overcome hereditary habits and reorganize itself com- pletely. It enjoyed freedom of choice, and the air was full of doctrines trying to captivate it, to lure it into a regrouping of inner attitudes. In the domain of public life nothing was settled as yet. People suffered from hunger, disorder, unemployment and the first signs of inflation. Street fighting became an everyday event. Revolutionary solutions seemed now remote, now just around the corner. The ever- smoldering class struggle kept fears and hopes aflame. 1 Schwarzschild, World in Trance, pp. 51-58. 3 Rosenberg, Geschichte der Deutschen Republik, pp. 48, 71-78. 48 44 THE POSTWAR PERIOD Of the two types of films in vogue immediately after the war the first elaborated upon matters of sex life with an undeniable penchant for pornographic excursions. Films of this kind took advantage of the sexual enlightenment officially promoted in prewar Germany. In those days eighteen-year-old boys did not leave high school for a university without being initiated by some medical man into the dangers of venereal diseases and the use of prophylactics. During the war, Richard Oswald, a versatile film director with a flair for the needs of the market, divined that the hour had come to transfer this indoctrination to the screen. He wisely managed to have the Society for Combatting Venereal Diseases (Gesettschaft wr Bekampfung der GeschlechtsJcrarMieiteri) sponsor his film Es WERDE LIGHT (LET THERE BE LIGHT) which dealt with the destructive nature of syphilis. This was in 1917. As box-office receipts justified his hygienic zeal, Oswald continued to keep the light burning by adding, in 1918, a second and third part. 8 The film was drawn out like an accordion. In the same year Davidson's Union, obviously stimulated by Oswald's success, released KJEIMENDES LEBEN (GEE- MUTATING LIFE) ; featuring Jannings, it advertised hygiene under the auspices of a high-ranking medical officer. 4 This dignified patronage of course bewitched the censors. When, immediately after the war, the Council of People's Rep- resentatives abolished censorship a measure revealing that govern- ment's confused ideas about revolutionary exigencies the effect was not a transformation of the screen into a political platform, but a sudden increase of films which pretended to be concerned with sexual enlightenment. Now that they had nothing to fear from official super- vision, they all indulged in a copious depiction of sexual debauch- eries. Refreshed by the atmosphere of freedom, Richard Oswald felt in so creative a mood that he annexed a fourth part to LET THERE BE LIGHT, and also made a film called PROSTITUTION. Scores of similar products swarmed out under such alluring titles as VOM RANDE DES SUMPFES (FROM THE VERGE OF THE SWAMP), FRATJEN, DIE DER ABGRTJND VERSCHLINGT (WOMEN ENGTTI.FED BY THE ABYSS), VEBXORENE TOCHTER (LosT DAUGHTERS), HYANEN DER LUST (HYENAS OF LUST), and so forth. One of them, GELtiBDE DER KETJCHHEIT (Vow OF CHASTITY), intermingled pictures detailing the love affairs of a Catholic priest with shots of devotees reciting 3 Kalbus, DeutscJie Fttmkuntt* I, 40-41. Ibid., p. 41 ; Jahrbuch der Fihninduttrie, 1922/8, p. 28. THE SHOCK OF FREEDOM 45 the rosary for the sake of the priest's soul. Two other films, sig- nificantly entitled Aus EINES MANNES MADCHENJAHREN (A MAN'S GIRLHOOD) and ANDERS AXS DIE ANDERN (DIFFERENT FROM THE OTHERS) , dwelt upon homosexual propensities ; they capitalized on the noisy resonance of Dr. Magnus Hirschfeld's campaign against Paragraph 175 of the penal code which exacted punishment for certain abnormal sex practices. 5 The appeal to sensual curiosity proved a sound commercial speculation. According to the balance sheets, many a movie theater doubled its monthly revenues whenever it exhibited outspoken sex films. 6 These were naturally advertised in suitable terms. For in- stance, the film DAS MADCHEN TTND DIE MANNER (THE Gmi, AND THE MEN) was played up as "a very spicy picture drawn from the life of a girl who storms through her youth in the arms of men, and fades away with a nostalgic longing for the greatness of unattain- able purity." 7 Films of that ilk attracted the multitude of demobi- lized soldiers not yet adjusted to a civilian life which seemed to reject them, the numerous youngsters who had grown up like weeds while their fathers were in the war, and all those who in times out of joint always come to the fore, seeking jobs, gambling, waiting for opportunities or simply prowling the streets. The more privi- leged also enjoyed these stimulants, as can be inferred from the success of OPIUM, which ran in an expensive Berlin movie theater with the house sold out for three weeks. 8 Of course, one avoided being seen on such occasions. The sex films testified to primitive needs arising in all belligerent countries after the war. Nature itself urged that people who had, for an eternity, faced death and destruction, reconfirm their violated life instincts by means of excesses. It was an all but automatic process ; equilibrium could not be reached at once. However, since the Germans survived the slaughter only to undergo the hardships of a sort of civil war, this fashion of sex films cannot be explained fully as a symptom of sudden release from pressure. Nor did it convey a revolutionary meaning. Even though some affected to be scandalized by the penal code's intolerance, these films had nothing in common with the prewar revolt against outmoded sexual conven- Kalbus, Deutsche Filmkunst, I, 41; Bger, Kinoreform, pp. 17-18; Zimmereimer, Film&ensur, p. 76. * Eger, Rinoreform, p. 28. 7 Ibid., p. 17. 8 Ibid., p. 18. 46 THE POSTWAR PERIOD tions. Nor did they reflect the revolutionary erotic feelings that quivered in contemporary literature, They were just vulgar films selling sex to the public. That the public demanded them rather indicated a general unwillingness to be involved in revolutionary activities; otherwise interest in sex would have been absorbed by interest in the political aims to be attained. Debaucheries are often an unconscious attempt to drown the consciousness of deep, inner frustration. This psychological mechanism seems to have forced itself upon many Germans. It was as if they felt paralyzed in view of the freedom offered them, and instinctively withdrew into the unproblematic pleasures of the flesh. An aura of sadness surrounded the sex films, With the favorable response to these films mingled, as might be expected, stiff opposition. In Diisseldorf the audience of Vow OF CHASTITY went so far as to tear the screen; in Baden the public prosecutor seized the copies of Oswald's PROSTITUTION and recom- mended his indictment. 9 Elsewhere youth took the lead, Dresden demonstrated against the film FRAITLEIN MUTTER (MAIDEN MOTHER), while the Leipzig boy scouts (Wandervogel) issued a manifesto disapproving of all screen trash and its promoters among the actors and owners of movie theaters. 10 Were these crusades the outcome of revolutionary austerity? That the demonstrating Dresden youth distributed anti-Semitic leaflets reveals this local campaign to have been a reactionary maneuver calculated to turn the resentments of the suffering petty bourgeoisie away from the old ruling class. By making the Jews responsible for the sex films, the wirepullers in Dresden could be fairly sure to influence lower middle-class people in the desired direc- tion. For these orgies and extravagances were condemned with a moral indignation which was all the more poisonous as it cloaked envy of those who embraced life unhesitatingly. The socialists too launched attacks against the sex films. In the National Assembly as well as in most diets they declared that their move to socialize and communal- ize the film industry would best serve to exterminate the plague on the screen, 11 But to suggest socialization for reasons of conven- tional morality was an argument that discredited the cause it sup* ported. The cause was a revolutionary shift ; the argument suited the Kalbus, D0t*ch* Fttmtotntt, I, 41-42. 10 Eger, Kinoreform t pp. 27-28. Tlid., p. 81 j Moreck, SitUngwMeMi t pp. 87-39. THE SHOCK OF FREEDOM 47 mind of philistines. This exemplifies the cleavage between the convic- tions of many socialists and their middle-class dispositions. The plague raged through 1919 and then subsided. In May 1920, the National Assembly rejected several motions in favor of socialization, and simultaneously passed a law governing all film matters of the Reich. National censorship was resumed. 12 The other type of film in vogue after the war was the historical pageant. While the sex films crowded the lower depths of the screen world, the histories self-assuredly settled themselves in the higher realms reserved for art. Whether they really represented summits of artistic perfection or not, they were planned as such by the founding fathers of Ufa who, as has been seen, promoted the idea of putting art to the service of propaganda. An interesting article published in January 1920 by Rudolf Pabst testifies to the thoroughness with which the Germans prepared for the reconquest of a prominent economic and cultural position. 18 Pabst severely criticized the current advertising shorts for sub- ordinating entertainment to propaganda. Since any audience, he argued, desires to be entertained, these shorts were resented as bor- ing interludes. He explained the tremendous success of most foreign propaganda films precisely by the fact that they were feature films full of suspense and action films, he emphasized, which implied propaganda subtly instead of shouting it from the rooftops. His conclusion was that the Germans should not outrightly advertise to people abroad their unbroken economic efficiency, but should rather lure them into recognizing it through full-length pictures offering outstanding entertainment. To serve as a means to an end this screen entertainment would have to seem an end in itself. It was not by mere chance that, about 1920, Deulig, which until now had specialized in propagandists documentaries, began to include in its production program films of fiction. 14 No sooner had Ufa been founded than its masters went ahead in the direction Pabst's article praised as good policy. There ex- isted a pattern of entertainment strongly appealing to their taste for all that was kolosscd: the Italian superspectacle. Such films as Quo VADIS and CABIRIA had been the rage of two continents. Of ia Jahrbuch der FUmindustrie, 1922/8, p. 81. 13 Pabst, "Bedeutung des Films," Modern* Kinemato graphic, 1920, p. 26 ff. See also Vincent, Histoire de I' Art Cintmatographique, p. 140. 14 Boehrner and Reitz, Film in Wirtschaft und Recht, p. 6. 48 THE POSTWAK PERIOD course, their cost was exorbitant; but Ufa could afford to spend millions. It began investing them in the film VERITAS VINCIT made by Joe May in 1918 a gigantic nonentity which resorted to the theory of the transmigration of souls to drag a love story through three pompously staged historic ages. 15 More important achievements followed this first attempt at grandiloquence; they were inspired by Davidson who, after the great merger of November 1917, had become one of Ufa's chief executives. Davidson dreamed of gorgeous dramas featuring his new favorite, Pola Negri, and since he considered Lubitsch the only one to handle such a superior woman, he tried hard to make the project alluring to him. "No, dear director," Lubitsch answered, "this is not for me. I am going on with my comedies." But he finally yielded to Davidson's wishes. While the war was slowly approaching its end, Lubitsch directed Pola Negri in two films, DIE MUMIE MA (THE EYES or THE MXTMMY) and CABMEN (GYPSY BLOOD). These films, which co-starred his actor-friends Emil Jannings and Harry Liedtke, established his reputation as a dramatic director and re- vealed him to be a true disciple of Max Reinhardt, whose stage de- vices he adapted to the screen. 16 The response to GYPSY BLOOD was sufficiently promising to en- courage further production of spectacular dramas. In the first two postwar years Lubitsch made four of them which thoroughly justi- fied the hopes Davidson had for their international success. This famous series began with MADAME DTJ BARRY (PASSION), released in Berlin's largest movie theater, the Ufa-Palast am Zoo, on Septem- ber 18, 1919, the very day of its opening to the public. 17 Huge dem- onstrations swept continuously through the Berlin streets at that time; similar throngs of aroused Parisians were unleashed in PAS- SION to illustrate the French Revolution. Was it a revolutionary film? Here are the salient points of the plot: After becoming the omnipotent mistress of King Louis XV, Countess du Barry, a former milliner's apprentice, frees her lover, Armand de Foix, who has been imprisoned for slaying his adversary in a duel, and ap- 15 Tannenbaum, "Der Grossfilm," J>er Film von Mar gen, p. 65 j Kalbus, Devtsche Filmtomst, I, 44. 10 Davidson, "Wie das deutsche Lichtspieltheater entstand," and Lubitsch, "Wte mein erster Grossfilm entstand," Licht Bild B&hne, pp. 8, 18-14; Kalbus, Veuttch* Fttmkunst, I, 45 ff. For Davidson, see "Was is los?" Ufa Magaxin, April 8-14, 1927. POP Pola Negri, see Kalbus, DeutscJi* Filmkunst, I, 81-32, and Balazs, Ddr tiehtbar* Mensch, p. 67. der Filmindustrie, im/8, p. 29, THE SHOCK OF FREEDOM 49 points him a royal guard at the palace. But, as the Ufa synopsis puts it, "Armand cannot bear these new conditions, and plots, making the cobhler Paillet head of the revolutionary plans." Paillet leads a deputation to the palace at the very moment when the King falls prey to deadly smallpox. Meeting the cobbler on a stairway, Madame du Barry sends him to the Bastille. A little later the story's contempt for historic facts is matched only by its disregard for their meaning Armand incites the masses to storm that symbol of absolutist power. Louis XV dies, and his mistress, now banished from the court, is dragged to the revolutionary tribunal over which Armand presides. He tries to rescue her. However, Paillet forestalls this tender project by killing Armand and having Madame du Barry sentenced to death. At the end, she is seen on the scaffold surrounded by innumerable vengeful fists that emerge from a crowd fanatically enjoying the fall of her beautiful head. This narrative of Hans Kraly's, who also fashioned the rest of the Lubitsch pageants in collaboration with Norbert Falk and others, drains the Revolution of its significance. Instead of tracing all revolutionary events to their economic and ideal causes, it per- sistently presents them as the outcome of psychological conflicts. It is a deceived lover who, animated by the desire for retaliation, talks the masses into capturing the Bastille. Similarly, Madame du Barry's execution is related not so much to political reasons as to motives of personal revenge. PASSION does not exploit the passions inherent in the Revolution, but reduces the Revolution to a derivative of private passions. If it were otherwise, the tragic death of both lovers would hardly overshadow the victorious rising of the people. 18 Lubitsch's three subsequent superproductions were in the same vein. In ANNA BOLEYN (DECEPTION, 1920) he spent 8% million marks on an elaborate depiction of Henry VIII's sex life, setting it off against a colorful background which included court intrigues, the Tower, two thousand extras and some historic episodes. In this particular case he did not have to distort the given facts very much to make history seem the product of a tyrant's private life. Here, too, despotic lusts destroy tender affections: a hired cavalier kills Anne Boleyn's lover, and finally she herself mounts the executioner's block. To intensify the sinister atmosphere torture episodes were ""Passion," Exceptional Photoplays, Nov. 1920; Ufa VerUihrProgramme, 1928, 1,2. 50 THE POSTWAR PERIOD inserted which an early reviewer called a "terse suggestion of medi- eval horror and callous infliction of death." 19 All these ingredients reappeared in DAS WEIB DBS PHARAO (THE LOVES OF PHARAOH, 1921), which nevertheless impressed the audi- ence as new, because it substituted the Sphinx for the Tower, and considerably increased the number of extras and intrigues. Its tyrant figure, the Pharaoh Amenes, is so infatuated with the Greek slave Theonis that he refuses to hand the girl back to her legitimate owner, an Ethiopian king; whereupon the two nations become in- volved in a bloody war. That Theonis prefers a young man named Ramphis to the Pharaoh adds the desired final touch to the emotional and political confusion. In a state of absent-mindedness the story unexpectedly heads for a happy ending, but at the last moment the tragic sense prevails, and instead of surviving their troubles, the lovers are stoned by the people, while Amenes dies from a stroke or inner exhaustion. 20 STTMURUN (ONE ARABIAN NIGHT, 1920), a screen version of Reinhardt's stage pantomime Swm/wrim with Pola Negri in the title role, withdrew from the realms of history into Oriental fairy-tale surroundings, making an old sheik in search of sex adventures the comical counterpart of Amenes and Henry VIII. The sheik surprises his son and his mistress, a young dancer, in each other arms an incident prearranged by a hunchbacked juggler who wants to take revenge for the indifference the dancer has shown him. In a fit of jealousy the sheik kills the sinful couple, whereupon the sensitive hunchback, in turn, feels urged to stab the sheik. Loaded with kisses and corpses, this showy fantasy pretended superiority to its theme by satirizing it pleasantly. 21 The whole series gave rise to numerous historical pageants which invariably adopted the standardized plot Lubitsch and his collabo- rators had fashioned. Buchowetski's much-praised DANTON (Aix FOR A WOMAN, released in 1921) outdid even PASSION in its con- tempt for the French Revolution. Envying Danton his popularity, the Robespierre of this film accuses him of debauchery and con- nivance with the aristocrats, but Danton's masterful speech during Quotation from "Deception," Exceptional Photoplays, April 1921, p. 4. See also Tamnenbaum, "Der GrossfiJm," Der Film von Morgtn, pp. 66, 68, 71; Ufa VerMfi- Profframme, 1928, I, 10. For Henny Porten in this film, see Amiguet, Cintmat Cintmal, pp. 61-62. * Program to this film; Kalbus, Deutsche Fitmkwwt, I, 47. ** Program to this film; Jacobs, American Film, p. 806 j Film Index, p. 800b. THE SHOCK OF FREEDOM 51 the trial transforms the suspicious audience into a crowd of ecstatic followers. To avert this threat Robespierre spreads the rumor that food has arrived and will be gratuitously distributed. The trick works : the people run away, leaving Danton to the mercy of his pitiless enemy. According to this film, the masses are as despicable as their leaders. 22 The international reception of any achievement depends upon its capacity for arousing fertile misunderstandings everywhere. Lubitsch's films the first German postwar productions to be shown abroad possessed this capacity. Towards the end of 1920, they began to appear in America, enthusiastically received by a public which at that time rather repudiated costume drama. All contem- porary reviewers were unanimous in praising as the main virtue of these films their sense of authenticity, their outstanding "historical realism." "History," a critic wrote of DECEPTION, "is presented to us naked and real and unromanticized in all its grandeur and its barbarism." Uneasy about the failure of Wilson's policy, the Ameri- can people had obviously such a craving for history debunked that they were attracted by films which pictured great historic events as the work of unscrupulous wire-pullers. Consequently, Lubitsch was called the "great humanizer of history" and the "Griffith of Europe." * The French had suffered too much from Germany to react as naively as the Americans. Obsessed by distrust, they imagined that anything coming from beyond the Rhine was intended to poison them. They therefore considered Lubitsch a clever propagandist rather than a great humanizer, and suspected his films of deliberately smearing the past of the Allies. In these films, the Paris film writer Canudo declared, "French history . . . was depicted by the per- verted and sexual pen of the Germans." The same opinion prevailed in other countries neighboring Germany. Although Fred.-Ph. Amiguet of Geneva was amiable enough to admire the verve of the Lubitsch spectacles, he bluntly stigmatized them as "instruments of vengeance." 24 These emotional judgments were hardly justified. M "AU for a Woman," Exceptional Photoplays, Nov. 1921, pp. 4-6; Zaddach, Z>r Kterarische Film, p. 41. as Quotation about DECEPTION comes from "Deception," Exceptional Photoplays, April 1921, p. 4; quotation about Lubitsch cited by Jacobs, American Film, p. 805. 34 Canudo quotation from Jahier, "42 Ans de Cinema," Le Bdle intellectuel dot Cintma, pp. 59-60. Amiguet, Cintma! Cinema!, pp. 88-84; Bardeche and BrasiUach, History of Motion Pictures, p. 189; Vincent, Hittoire de VArt Cine'matographigue, p. 142. 62 THE POSTWAR PERIOD That the Lubitsch films did not aim at discrediting French or English history follows conclusively from the vital interest Ufa had in selling them to the Allies. In his history of German film art, a Nazi-minded product with some remnants of pre-Nazi evaluations, Oskar Kalbus connects the vogue of historical pageants with the moment of their production; they were produced, he contends, "because in times of national emer- gency people are particularly susceptible to representations of great historic periods and personalities." 2{s He completely overlooks the fact that this susceptibility was betrayed by films representing not so much historic periods as personal appetites and seeming to seize upon history for the sole purpose of removing it thoroughly from the field of vision. 36 It is not as if the historical films of Italian or American origin had ever achieved miracles of perspicacity ; but the sustained lack of comprehension in the Lubitsch films is significant inasmuch as they emerged at a moment when it would have been in the interest of the new democratic regime to enlighten the people about social and political developments. All these German pageants which the Americans mistook for summits of "historical realism" instinctively sabotaged any understanding of historic processes, any attempt to explore patterns of conduct in the past. A hint of the true meaning of the Lubitsch films can be found in the fact that Lubitsch played the hunchback in ONE ARABIAN NIGHT. It was at that time quite exceptional for him to take a role himself. After stabbing the sheik and freeing all the women in his harem, the hunchback returns from the scene of wholesale murder to his fair booth, "He must dance and gambol again," the Ufa prospectus states, "for the public wants a laugh." Through his identification with a juggler who drowns horrors in jokes, Lubitsch involuntarily deepens the impression that the vogue he helped to create originated in a blend of cynicism and melodramatic senti- mentality. The touch of melodrama made the implications of this cynicism more palatable. Its source was a nihilistic outlook on world affairs, as can be inferred from the stern determination with which the Lubitsch films and their like not only put insatiable rulers to death, but also destroyed young lovers representative of all that counts in life. They characterized history as meaningless. History, they seemed to say, is an arena reserved for blind and ferocious " Kalbus, Deutsche Filmkunst, I, 51. 28 Cf. Chowl, "The French Revolution," Close Up, May 1929, p. 49. THE SHOCK OF FREEDOM 53 instincts, a product of devilish machinations forever frustrating our hopes for freedom and happiness. Designed for mass consumption, this nihilistic gospel must have satisfied widespread wants. It certainly poured balm on the wounds of innumerable Germans who, because of the humiliating defeat of the fatherland, refused any longer to acknowledge history as an in- strument of justice or Providence. By degrading the French Revo- lution to a questionable adventure in both PASSION and ALL FOB A WOMAN, that nihilism moreover revealed itself as a symptom of strong antirevolutionary, if not antidemocratic, tendencies in post- war Germany. It was, for once, a nihilism that did not scare the nation. Why? The only tenable explanation is that, whether con- sciously or not, the majority of people lived in fear of social changes and therefore welcomed films which defamed not only bad rulers but also good revolutionary causes. These films outrightly encour- aged the existing resistance to any emotional shift that might have enlivened the German Republic. Their basic nihilism made them indulge also in images of utter destruction, which, like those of THE STUDENT or PRAGUE or HOMUNCULUS, reflected forebodings of a final doom. American observers admired the free use made of the camera in these Lubitsch pageants. Lewis Jacobs remarks of them that it was revolutionary in those days "to tilt a camera toward the sky or turn it toward an arabesque mosaic in a floor, and to see the backs of a crowd was unorthodox ; quick cutting, too, was shocking." 27 His statement mistakenly suggests that the Lubiix i. films were the first to develop this camera initiative, but it was the war that had aroused the camera's curiosity by making it focus upon subjects of military importance. Photographs of a shell crater with a few pairs of legs at the upper margin or an agglomeration of rifles, truck wheels and torsos were then quite common. 28 While tradi- tional aesthetics would have condemned such photographs as in- coherent, the war generation which had become accustomed to them began enjoying their singular power of expression. This change of visual habits emboldened the camera to emphasize parts of bodies, to capture objects from unusual angles. Lubitsch's method of furthering the dramatic action through 37 Jacobs, American Film, p. 806. Surprisingly, Jacobs forgets to mention in this connection D. W. Griffith, whose film techniques surpassed those of Lubitsch. 88 Gregor, Zeitalter fas Film*, pp. 81-82. 54 THE POSTWAR PERIOD shots of this kind was an additional innovation. Shaken by catas- trophe, the Germans had to adjust their conventional notions to the needs of the moment. In the wake of any such metamorphosis per- spectives change : things consecrated by tradition lose their prestige, wliile others that have been as yet overlooked suddenly come to the fore. Since the Lubitsch pageants substituted for the old conception of history one that dissolved history into psychology, they were naturally obliged to resort to a new set of pictorial elements. Their psychological tendency made them single out such details as the arabesque mosaic or the backs of a crowd seeming bagatelles which, however, effectively underlined major emotional events. What fascinated the public most was "Mr. Lubitsch's indis- putable talent for handling crowds." 29 Many years after the release of his films moviegoers still remembered as their main attraction the throngs of the Paris rabble in PASSION, the agitated battle scenes in THE LOVES OF PHARAOH and that episode of DECEPTION which showed all London before the Tower attending Anna Boleyn's sol- emn entrance. 30 Lubitsch had of course learned from Max Reinhardt, who early proved himself a master in the art of surrounding his stage crowds with appropriate space and orchestrating their move- ments dramatically. Perhaps Reinhardt sensed coming events, for crowds were to develop from an element of his stage into one of German everyday life a process that reached its climax after the war, when no one could avoid encountering them on streets and squares. These masses were more than a weighty social factor ; they were as tangible as any individual. A hope to some and a nightmare to others, they haunted the imagination. Ernst Toller's "speaking chorus 9 ' tried to endow them with a voice of their own, and Reinhardt himself paid tribute to them by founding his short-lived "Theater of the Five Thousand." 81 The moment for rendering crowds on the screen was well chosen inasmuch as they now assumed the aspect of dynamic units sweeping through large spaces an aspect which the screen rather than the stage was able to mirror. Lubitsch knew how to handle such crowds, and even showed true originality in elaborating a feature familiar Quotation from "The Loves of Pharaoh," Exceptional Photoplays, Jan^-Feb. 1922, p, 8. See also "Passion," ibid., Nov. 1920, p. 3, a Birnbaum, "Massenscenen im Film," Ufa-Blatter; Tannenbaura, "Der Gross- film," Der Film von Morgen, p. 66. 31 Birnbaum, "Massenscenen ira Film," Ufa-B fatter; Samuel and Thomas, Ex- pressionism in German Life, pp. 46-47; Freedley and Reeves, History of the Theatre, esp. p. 529. THE SHOCK OF FREEDOM 55 to all postwar Germans: the contrast between the individual in the crowd and the crowd itself as a solid mass. To this end he used an exclusively cinematic device which cannot better be described than in the following words of Miss Lejeune: "Lubitsch had a way of manipulating his puppets that gave multitude, and in contrast, loneliness, a new force. No one before had so filled and drained his spaces with the wheeling mass, rushing in the figures from every corner to cover the screen, dispersing them again like a whirlwind, with one single figure staunch in the middle of the empty square." 82 The mass scene typical of the Lubitsch films decomposed the crowd to exhibit as its nucleus "one single figure" who, after the crowd's dissolution, was left alone in the void. Thus the individual appeared as a forlorn creature in a world threatened by mass domination [Ulus. 1] . Paralleling the stereotyped plot of all those pageants, this pictorial device treated the pathetic solitude of the individual with a sympathy which implied aversion to the plebeian mass and fear of its dangerous power. It was a device that testified to the anti- democratic inclinations of the moment. In the Lubitsch films and their derivatives these portrayed, in addition to Danton, such characters as Lucrezia Borgia and Lady Hamilton two disparate tendencies constantly intermingled. 83 One manifested itself in architectural structures, costumes and genre scenes which resurrected bygone surface life. With this extrovert tendency an introvert one competed: the depiction of certain psycho- logical configurations with an utter disregard for given facts. But this medley did not disturb anyone. The film-makers were expert at molding the ingredients of a film into a prepossessing mixture that would conceal divergences rather than expose them. What this mix- ture did reveal, of course, was the inherent nihilism of which I have spoken. The deceptive blend of conventional realism and overweening psychology Lubitsch and his followers devised was never generally adopted. In most important German postwar films introspection outweighed the extrovert tendency. Influenced not so much by Lubitsch's pseudo-realistic PASSION as by Wegener's fantastic STIT- 3a Lejeune, Cinema, p. 64; Tannenbaum, "Der Grossfilm," Der Film von Morgen, p. 66. 33 For LtrcBEziA BOEOIA (1922), see Tannenbaum, ibid., p. 67, and Zaddach, Der literarische Film, pp. 45-49. For LADY HAMILTON (1921), see Tannenbaum, ibid., p. 67, and Birnbaum, "Massenscenen im Film," Ufa-BUtter. See also Kalbus, Deutsche FUmkunst, I, 52-68, 60. 56 THE POSTWAR PERIOD DENT OF PRAGUE, these films reflected major events in emotional depths with an intensity that transformed customary surroundings into strange jungles. They predominated between 1920 and 1924, a period which will be considered as a consecutive whole. But before examining the essential achievements of the postwar period, some attention must be given to films of secondary impor- tance. To characterize them in this way is a verdict on their sympto- matic rather than aesthetic value. They satisfied wants of the moment or obsolete tastes, seized upon provincial peculiarities as well as upon themes of world-wide interest. Significantly, they did not follow the introvert tendency of the time, but dealt with subjects that allowed them more or less to preserve the usual aspects of life. Among them, flourishing from 1919 to 1920, was a group of popular films concerned with sensational adventures encountered at every known or unknown spot on earth. The unknown spots were pre- ferred because of their exotic spell. In DIE HEREIN DEB WELT (MISTRESS or THE WOULD), a serial in eight parts, a valiant Ger- man girl traveled from the unexplored interior of China to the legendary country of Ophir to find there the fabulous treasure of the Queen of Sheba. 3 * Other films of this kind such as the gay DER MANN OHNE NAMEN (MAN WITHOUT A NAME) and Fritz Lang's first picture, DIE SPINNEN (THE SPIDERS) also assumed the form of lengthy serials, perhaps tempted by the immensity of geographical space they covered. 35 Even though Joe May's 20-million-mark film DAS INDISCHE GRABMAI/ (THE INDIAN TOMB) modestly confined itself to India and normal footage, it outdid the serials in thrilling epi- sodes. This superproduction, which imparted the same sinister moral as the Lubitsch pageants, not only adapted the miraculous practices of yoga to the screen, but showed rats gnawing the fetters of its captive hero, elephants forming a gigantic lane and an all-out fight against tigers. 36 Circuses at that time made nice profits out of animal rentals. The whole group of films, with its craving for exotic sceneries, re- sembled a prisoner's daydream. The prison was of course the muti- 34 Program to this film; Kalbus, ibid., pp. 41U8. 35 Kalbus, ibid., p. 48. For other exotic adventurer films of this kind, see Birn- baum, "Massenscenen im Film," Ufar-Blatter, and Kalbus, ibid., pp. 90-91. 3 * Kalbus, ibid., pp. 49, 94; Mtihsam, "Tiere im Film," Ufa^Bldtter; Tannenbaum, **Der Grossfilm," Der Film von Morgen, p. 71 ; Balazs, X>0r tiohtbare Menaoh, p. 113. THE SHOCK OF FREEDOM 57 lated and blockaded fatherland; at least, this was the way most Ger- mans felt about it. What they called their world mission had been thwarted, and now all exits seemed barred. These space-devouring films reveal how bitterly the average German resented his involun- tary seclusion. They functioned as substitutes ; they naively satisfied his suppressed desire for expansion through pictures that enabled his imagination to reannex the world, including Ophir. As for Ophir, the prospectus of MISTRESS OF THE WORLD did not forget to note that the idea of locating this mythical kingdom in Africa had been advocated by Karl Peters. Since Karl Peters was the promoter of the German Colonization Society (Deut seller Kolonialverem) and one of the founders of German East Africa, the mention of his name overtly indicated the film's timely connotations. Inflation prevented the film producers at that moment from sending costly expeditions to the edge of the world. 87 The consequence was that a Chinese pagoda topped a German hill, and Brandenburg's sandy plain served as a genuine desert. This extensive faking proved a vehicle of progress inasmuch as it forced the German studio teams to develop many a new craft. In the interest of completeness a mania too boring to be culti- vated, yet too rewarding to be altogether suppressed one should not overlook the comedies produced during that period of introvert films. It was again Lubitsch who took the lead in this field, which he had left only to oblige Davidson. Had he left it? While he was inciting a mass of extras to curse Madame du Barry and cheer Anne Boleyn, he was also directing a sort of film operetta, DEB PUPPE (THE DOLL, 1919), and the satire DIE AUSTERNPRINZESSEN (THE OYSTER PRINCESS, 1919) which is said to have clumsily ridi- culed American habits within spectacular settings. 38 Thus he put into practice the philosophy of his hunchback in SUMXJRXJN who "must dance and gambol again, for the public wants a laugh." Considering the speed with which Lubitsch exchanged murders and tortures for dancing and joking, it is highly probable that his comedies sprang from the same nihilism as his historical dramas. This tendency made it easy for him to drain great events of their seriousness and realize comical potentialities in trifles. Seasoned by him, such trifles became truffles. From 1921 on, having done away * 7 Kalbus, Deutsche Fihnkuntt, 1, 102-4. 38 Vincent, Sistoire de VArt Ointmatographique, p. 142; Bardfeche and Brasillach, History of Motion Pictures, pp. 189-90; Kalbus, Devitche Fitmkunst, I, 85-86. 58 THE POSTWAR PERIOD with history, Lubitsch devoted himself almost exclusively to^the savory entertainment of which he was master. In his coolly received DIE BERGKATZE (MOUNTAIN CAT, 1921), Pola Negri moved, a catlike brigand's daughter, between swollen architectural forms which assisted in a parody of boastful Balkan manners, pompous militarism and, perhaps, the expressionist vogue. 89 If it were not for Lubitsch, the German film comedies of the time would hardly be worth mentioning. Adaptations of operettas and stage plays among these the indestructible AM HEIDELBERG ( STU- DENT PRINCE, 1923) prevailed over products of genuine screen humor, and American comedies ingratiated themselves more effec- tively than the native ones with a public eager for a moment's laugh- ter. 40 This proves again that in Germany the natural desire for hap- piness was not so much catered to as tolerated. Escapist needs were somewhat balanced by the urge to take sides in the conflict of opinions. A true expression of philistine indigna- tion, several films deplored the general postwar depravity, the craze for dancing and the nouveaux riches.* 1 Outright propaganda mes- sages intermingled with these moral verdicts. Two films discredited the French army, causing the French government to send sharp notes to Berlin; others incurred the censor's veto by spreading anti- Semitic and antirepublican views. 42 Owing to the tense atmosphere of those years, even remote themes occasionally aroused political passions. In 1923, the Munich performance of a film version of Lessing's Nathan the Wise had to be discontinued because of anti- Semitic riots an incident foreshadowing the notorious Berlin Nazi demonstrations which, nine years later, were to result in the pro- hibition of Remarque's ALL QUIET ON THE WESTERN FRONT. 48 However, all these screen events are of a merely ideological interest; they characterize group intentions rather than group dispositions. As early as 1919 Dr. Victor E. Pordes, a German writer on aesthetics, complained of the awkwardness with which the German screen shaped stories involving scenes of society life and questions of savoir-faire. Whenever civilized manners are to be mirrored, he 39 Kalbus, ibid. t p. 86; Kurtz, Expressionismus, p. 82. < Kalbus, Deutsche Filmkwwt, I, esp. 77. For early German film comedies, see also Ufa Verleih-Programme, 1928/1924, p. 68 ff. 41 Kalbus, Deutsche Filmkunst, I, 58. Jahrbuch der Filmfadwttrie, 1922/8, pp. 88, 41. a Jahrbuch der Filmtodufitrie, 1922/8, p. 46 j Kalbus, Deuttch* Filmkwmt, I, 68; Zaddach, Der literaritche Film, pp. 49-50. THE SHOCK OF FREEDOM 59 said, Danish, French and American films by far surpass the German ones "in the social education and quality of the bulk of players, in the tone, shading and artistic discretion of acting, and finally hi the precise knowledge and observance of manners." 44 But it was cer- tainly not sheer inability that interfered with the rendering of man- ners on the German screen. Rather, Pordes' criticism corroborates what has already been stated about the introvert tendency of all representative films up to 1924. They were not intended to record given phenomena; their failure to do so was an inevitable con- sequence of their intrinsic design. The progressive literary products and paintings of the time manifested exactly the same aversion to realism. Yet this similarity of style did not exclude differences of content and meaning; on the contrary, in all such essentials the screen went its own, independent way. The introvert tendency it fol- lowed up must be traced to powerful collective desires. Millions of Germans, in particular middle-class Germans, seem to have shut themselves off from a world determined by Allied pressure, violent internal struggles and inflation. They acted as if under the influence of a terrific shock which upset normal relations between their outer and inner existence. On the surface, they lived on as before; psycho- logically, they withdrew within themselves. This retreat into a shell was favored by several circumstances. First, it admirably suited the interests of the German ruling set, whose chances of survival depended upon the readiness of the masses to pass over the reasons for their sufferings. Secondly, the middle- class strata had always been content with being governed, and now that political freedom had come overnight, they were theoretically as well as practically unprepared to assume responsibilities. The shock they experienced was caused by the inroads of freedom. Thirdly, they entered the arena at a moment when any attempt to make up for the aborted bourgeois emancipation was bound to pre- cipitate a socialist solution. And would the Social Democrats them- selves venture on revolutionary experiments? The whole situation seemed so thorny that no one felt bold enough to cope with it. Nevertheless, it would be an undue simplification to label the psychological exodus from the outer world a merely retrogressive move. During the period of its retreat, the German mind was shaken by convulsions which upset the whole emotional system. While this mind neglected, or obstructed, all external revolutionary possibilities, Pordes, DM Lichtaptol, p. 106. 60 THE POSTWAR PERIOD it made an extreme effort to reconsider the foundations of the self, to adjust the self to the actual conditions of life. Qualms about those deep-rooted dispositions which had supported the collapsed authori- tative regime constantly interfered with the desire to keep them alive. It is true that during the postwar years introspection dealt solely with the isolated individual. But this does not necessarily mean that the Germans insisted upon perpetuating the individual's autonomy at the expense of his social liabilities. Rather, the German conception of the individual was so rich in traditional values that it could not unhesitatingly be thrown overboard. The films of the postwar period from 1920 to 1924 are a unique mcmologue intSrieur. They reveal developments in almost inaccessible layers of the German mind. 5, CALIGARI THE Czech Hans Janowitz, one of the two authors of the film DAS CABINET DES DR. CALIGARI (THE CABINET OF DR. CALIGARI), was brought up in Prague that city where reality fuses with dreams, and dreams turn into visions of horror. 1 One evening in October 1913 this young poet was strolling through a fair at Hamburg, trying to find a girl whose beauty and manner had attracted him. The tents of the fair covered the Reeperbahn, known to any sailor as one of the world's chief pleasure spots. Nearby, on the Holstenwall, Lederer's gigantic Bismarck monument stood sentinel over the ships in the harbor. In search of the girl, Janowitz followed the fragile trail of a laugh which he thought hers into a dim park bordering the Hol- stenwall. The laugh, which apparently served to lure a young man, vanished somewhere in the shrubbery. When, a short time later, the young man departed, another shadow, hidden until then in the bushes, suddenly emerged and moved along as if on the scent of that laugh. Passing this uncanny shadow, Janowitz caught a glimpse of him: he looked like an average bourgeois. Darkness reabsorbed the man, and made further pursuit impossible. The following day big headlines in the local press announced: "Horrible sex crime on the Holstenwall! Young Gertrude . . . murdered." An obscure feeling that Gertrude might have been the girl of the fair impelled Janowitz to attend the victim's funeral. During the ceremony he suddenly had the sensation of discovering the murderer, who had not yet been captured. The man he suspected seemed to recognize him, too. It was the bourgeois the shadow in the bushes. Carl Mayer, co-author with Janowitz of CALIGARI, was born in the Austrian provincial capital of Graz, where his father, a wealthy 1 The following episode, along with other data appearing in my pages on CAIJOABI, is drawn from an interesting manuscript Mr. Hans Janowitz has written about the genesis of this film. I feel greatly indebted to him for having put his material at my disposal. I am thus in a position to base my interpretation of CAUOAM on the true inside story, up to now unknown. 61 62 THE POSTWAR PERIOD businessman, would have prospered had he not been obsessed by the idea of becoming a "scientific" gambler. In the prime of life he sold his property, went, armed with an infallible "system," to Monte Carlo, and reappeared a few months later in Graz, broke. Under the stress of this catastrophe, the monomaniac father turned the sixteen- year-old Carl and his three younger brothers out into the street and finally committed suicide. A mere boy, Carl Mayer was responsible for the three children. While he toured through Austria, peddling barometers, singing in choirs and playing extras in peasant theaters, he became increasingly interested in the stage. There was no branch of theatrical production which he did not explore during those years of nomadic life years full of experiences that were to be of immense use in his future career as a film poet. At the beginning of the war, the adolescent made his living by sketching Hindenburg portraits on postcards in Munich cafe's. Later in the war, Janowitz reports, he had to undergo repeated examinations of his mental condition. Mayer seems to have been very embittered against the high-ranking military psychiatrist in charge of his case. The war was over. Janowitz, who from its outbreak had been an officer in an infantry regiment, returned as a convinced pacifist, animated by hatred of an authority which had sent millions of men to death. He felt that absolute authority was bad in itself. He settled in Berlin, met Carl Mayer there, and soon found out that this eccen- tric young man, who had never before written a line, shared his revolutionary rnoods and views. Why not express them on the screen? Intoxicated with Wegener's films, Janowitz believed that this new medium might lend itself to powerful poetic revelations. As youth will, the two friends embarked on endless discussions that hovered around Janowitz* Holstenwall adventure as well as Mayer's mental duel with the psychiatrist. These stories seemed to evoke and supple- ment each other. After such discussions the pair would stroll through the night, irresistibly attracted by a dazzling and clamorous fair on Kantstrasse. It was a bright jungle, more hell than paradise, but a paradise to those who had exchanged the horror of war for the terror of want. One evening, Mayer dragged his companion to a side-show by which he had been impressed. Under the title "Man or Machine" it presented a strong man who achieved miracles of strength in an apparent stupor. He acted as if he were hypnotized. The strangest thing was that he accompanied his feats with utterances which affected the spellbound spectators as pregnant forebodings. CALIGARI 63 Any creative process approaches a moment when only one addi- tional experience is needed to integrate all elements into a whole. The mysterious figure of the strong man supplied such an experience. On the night of this show the friends first visualized the original story of CALIGABI. They wrote the manuscript in the following six weeks. Defining the part each took in the work, Janowitz calls himself "the father who planted the seed, and Mayer the mother who conceived and ripened it." At the end, one small problem arose: the authors were at a loss as to what to christen their main character, a psychi- atrist shaped after Mayer's archenemy during the war. A rare volume, Unknown Letters of Stendhal, offered the solution. While Janowitz was skimming through this find of his, he happened to notice that Stendhal, just come from the battlefield, met at La Scala in Milan an officer named Caligari. The name clicked with both authors. Their story is located in a fictitious North German town near the Dutch border, significantly called Holstenwall. One day a fair moves into the town, with merry-go-rounds and side-shows among the latter that of Dr. Caligari, a weird, bespectacled man advertising the somnambulist Cesare. To procure a license, Caligari goes to the town hall, where he is treated haughtily by an arrogant official. The following morning this official is found murdered in his room, which does not prevent the townspeople from enjoying the fair's pleasures. Along with numerous onlookers, Francis and Alan two students in love with Jane, a medical man's daughter enter the tent of Dr. Caligari, and watch Cesare slowly stepping out of an upright, coffinlike box. Caligari tells the thrilled audience that the somnam- bulist will answer questions about the future. Alan, in an excited state, asks how long he has to live. Cesare opens his mouth ; he seems to be dominated by a terrific, hypnotic power emanating from his master. "Until dawn," he answers. At dawn Francis learns that his friend has been stabbed in exactly the same manner as the official. The student, suspicious of Caligari, persuades Jane's father to assist him in an investigation. With a search warrant the two force their way into the showman's wagon, and demand that he end the trance of his medium. However, at this very moment they are called away to the police station to attend the examination of a criminal who has been caught in the act of killing a woman, and who now frantically denies that he is the pursued serial murderer. Francis continues spying on Caligari, and, after nightfall, se- 64 THE POSTWAR PERIOD cretly peers through a window of the wagon. But while he imagines he sees Cesare lying in his box, Cesare in reality breaks into Jane's bedroom, lifts a dagger to pierce the sleeping girl, gazes at her, puts the dagger away and flees, with the screaming Jane in his arms, over roofs and roads. Chased by her father, he drops the girl, who is then escorted home, whereas the lonely kidnaper dies of exhaustion. As Jane, in flagrant contradiction of what Francis believes to be the truth, insists on having recognized Cesare, Francis approaches Cali- gari a second time to solve the torturing riddle. The two policemen in his company seize the coffinlike box, and Francis draws out of it a dummy representing the somnambulist. Profiting by the investi- gators' carelessness, Caligari himself manages to escape. He seeks shelter in a lunatic asylum. The student follows him, calls on the director of the asylum to inquire about the fugitive, and recoils horror-struck: the director and Caligari are one and the same person. The following night the director has fallen asleep Francis and three members of the medical staff whom he has initiated into the case search the director's office and discover material fully establish- ing the guilt of this authority in psychiatric matters. Among a pile of books they find an old volume about a showman named Caligari who, in the eighteenth century, traveled through North Italy, hyp- notized his medium Cesare into murdering sundry people, and, during Cesar e's absence, substituted a wax figure to deceive the police. The main exhibit is the director's clinical records ; they evi- dence that he desired to verify the account of Caligari's hypnotic faculties, that his desire grew into an obsession, and that, when a somnambulist was entrusted to his care, he could not resist the temptation of repeating with him those terrible games. He had adopted the identity of Caligari. To make him admit his crimes, Francis confronts the director with the corpse of his tool, the som- nambulist. No sooner does the monster realize Cesare is dead than he begins to rave. Trained attendants put him into a strait jacket. This horror tale in the spirit of E. T. A. Hoffmann was an out- spoken revolutionary story. In it, as Janowitz indicates, he and Carl Mayer half-intentionally stigmatized the omnipotence of a state authority manifesting itself in universal conscription and declara- tions of war. The German war government seemed to the authors the prototype of such voracious authority. Subjects of the Austro- Hungarian monarchy, they were in a better position than most citi- CALIGARI 65 zens of the Reich to penetrate the fatal tendencies inherent in the German system. The character of Caligari embodies these tendencies ; he stands for an unlimited authority that idolizes power as such, and, to satisfy its lust for domination, rutlilessly violates all human rights and values [Illus. 2] . Functioning as a mere instrument, Cesare is not so much a guilty murderer as Caligari's innocent victim. This is how the authors themselves understood him. According to the paci- fist-minded Janowitz, they had created Cesare with the dim design of portraying the common man who, under the pressure of compul- sory military service, is drilled to kill and to be killed. The revolu- tionary meaning of the story reveals itself unmistakably at the end, with the disclosure of the psychiatrist as Caligari: reason over- powers unreasonable power, insane authority is symbolically abol- ished. Similar ideas were also being expressed on the contemporary stage, but the authors of CALIGARI transferred them to the screen without including any of those eulogies of the authority-freed "New Man" in which many expressionist plays indulged. A miracle occurred: Erich Pommer, chief executive of Decla- Bioscop, accepted this unusual, if not subversive, script. Was it a miracle? Since in those early postwar days the conviction prevailed that foreign markets could only be conquered by artistic achieve- ments, the German film industry was of course anxious to experiment in the field of aesthetically qualified entertainment. 2 Art assured ex- port, and export meant salvation. An ardent partisan of this doc- trine, Pommer had moreover an incomparable flair for cinematic values and popular demands. Regardless of whether he grasped the significance of the strange story Mayer and Janowitz submitted to him, he certainly sensed its timely atmosphere and interesting scenic potentialities. He was a born promoter who handled screen and business affairs with equal facility, and, above all, excelled in stimu- lating the creative energies of directors and players. In 1923, Ufa was to make him chief of its entire production. 3 His behind-the-scenes activities were to leave their imprint on the pre-Hitler screen. Pommer assigned Fritz Lang to direct CAUGARI, but in the middle of the preliminary discussions Lang was ordered to finish his serial THE SPIDERS; the distributors of this film urged its comple- tion. 4 Lang's successor was Dr. Robert Wiene. Since his father, a a Vincent, Htetoire do VArt CinAmatogrcuphique, p. 140. 3 Jahrbuch der FUmindwttrie, 1922/8, pp. 85, 46. For an appraisal of Pommer, see Lejeune, Cinema, pp. 125-31. 4 Information offered by Mr. Lang. Cf. p. 56. 66 THE POSTWAR PERIOD once-famous Dresden actor, had become slightly insane towards the end of his life, Wiene was not entirely unprepared to tackle the case of Dr. Caligari. He suggested, in complete harmony with what Lang had planned, an essential change of the original story a change against which the two authors violently protested. But no one heeded them* 5 The original story was an account of real horrors ; Wiene's ver- sion transforms that account into a chimera concocted and narrated by the mentally deranged Francis. To effect this transformation the body of the original story is put into a framing story which introduces Francis as a madman. The film CALIGARI opens with the first of the two episodes composing the frame. Francis is shown sitting on a bench in the park of the lunatic asylum, listening to the confused babble of a fellow sufferer. Moving slowly, like an appari- tion, a female inmate of the asylum passes by: it is Jane. Francis says to his companion: "What I have experienced with her is still stranger than what you have encountered. I will tell it to you." 6 Fade-out. Then a view of Holstenwall fades in, and the original story unfolds, ending, as has been seen, with the identification of Caligari. After a new fade-out the second and final episode of the framing story begins. Francis, having finished the narration, follows his com- panion back to the asylum, where he mingles with a crowd of sad figures among them Cesare, who absent-mindedly caresses a little flower. The director of the asylum, a mild and understanding-looking person, joins the crowd. Lost in the maze of his hallucinations, Francis takes the director for the nightmarish character he himself has created, and accuses this imaginary fiend of being a dangerous madman. He screams, he fights the attendants in a frenzy. The scene is switched over to a sickroom, with the director putting on horn-rimmed spectacles which immediately change his appearance: it seems to be Caligari who examines the exhausted Francis. After this he removes his spectacles and, all mildness, tells his assistants that Francis believes him to be Caligari. Now that he understands the case of his patient, the director concludes, he will be able to heal him. With this cheerful message the audience is dismissed. Janowitz and Mayer knew why they raged against the framing story: it perverted, if not reversed, their intrinsic intentions. While Extracted from Mr. Janowitafs manuscript. See also Vincent, Sistoire de VArt Cintmatoffraphique, pp. 140, 148-44. 6 Film license, issued by Board of Censors, Berlin, 1921 and 1925 (Museum of Modern Art Library, clipping files) ; Film Society Programme, March 14, 1925. CALIGABI 67 the original story exposed the madness inherent in authority, Wiene's CALIGABI glorified authority and convicted its antagonist of madness. A revolutionary film was thus turned into a conformist one follow- ing the much-used pattern of declaring some normal but troublesome individual insane and sending him to a lunatic asylum. This change undoubtedly resulted not so much from Wiene's personal predilec- tions as from his instinctive submission to the necessities of the screen ; films, at least commercial films, are forced to answer to mass desires. In its changed form CALIGABI was no longer a product ex- pressing, at best, sentiments characteristic of the intelligentsia, but a film supposed equally to be in harmony with what the less educated felt and liked. If it holds true that during the postwar years most Germans eagerly tended to withdraw from a harsh outer world into the intan- gible realm of the soul, Wiene's version was certainly more consistent with their attitude than the original story; for, by putting the original into a box, this version faithfully mirrored the general rt treat into a shell. In CALIGABI (and several other films of the time) the device of a framing story was not only an aesthetic form, but also had symbolic content. Significantly, Wiene avoided mutilating the original story itself. Even though CALIGABI had become a conformist film, it preserved and emphasized this revolutionary story as a madman's fantasy. Caligari's defeat now belonged among psycho- logical experiences. In this way Wiene's film does suggest that during their retreat into themselves the Germans were stirred to reconsider their traditional belief in authority. Down to the bulk of social democratic workers they refrained from revolutionary action ; yet at the same time a psychological revolution seems to have pre- pared itself in the depths of the collective soul. The film reflects this double aspect of German life by coupling a reality in which Cali- gari's authority triumphs with a hallucination in which the same authority is overthrown. There could be no better configuration of symbols for that uprising against the authoritarian dispositions which apparently occurred under the cover of a behavior rejecting uprising. Janowitz suggested that the settings for CALIGABI be designed by the painter and illustrator Alfred Kubin, who, a forerunner of the surrealists, made eerie phantoms invade harmless scenery and visions of torture emerge from the subconscious. Wiene took to the 68 THE POSTWAR PERIOD idea of painted canvases, but preferred to Kubin three expressionist artists: Hermann Warm, Walter Rohrig and Walter Reimann. They were affiliated with the Berlin Sturm group, which, through Herwarth Walden's magazine Sturm, promoted expressionism in every field of art. 7 Although expressionist painting and literature had evolved years before the war, they acquired a public only after 1918. In this respect the case of Germany somewhat resembled that of Soviet Russia where, during the short period of war communism, diverse currents of abstract art enjoyed a veritable heyday. 8 To a revolu- tionized people expressionism seemed to combine the denial of bour- geois traditions with faith in man's power freely to shape society and nature. On account of such virtues it may have cast a spell over many Germans upset by the breakdown of their universe. 9 "Films must be drawings brought to life": this was Hermann Warm's formula at the time that he and his two fellow designers were constructing the CAUGARI world. 10 In accordance with his beliefs, the canvases and draperies of CALIGABI abounded in complexes of 7 Mr. Janowitz's manuscript; Vincent, Histoire de VArt Qin6ma,tograpUgu6> p. 144; Rotha, Film Till Now, p. 43. 8 Kurtz, Expressionisms, p. 61. 9 In Berlin, immediately after the war, Karl Heinz Martin staged two little dramas by Ernst Toller and Walter Hasenclever within expressionist settings. Cf. Kurtz, ibid., p. 48; Vincent, Histovre de VArt QinematograyUque, pp. 142-48; Schapiro, "Nature of Abstract Art," Marxist Quarterly, Jan -March 1987, p. 97. 10 Quotation from Kurtz, Expressionisma*, p. 66. Warm's views, which implied a verdict on films as photographed reality, harmonized with those of Viking Eggeling, an abstract Swedish painter living in Germany. Having eliminated all objects from his canvases, Eggeling deemed it logical to involve the surviving geometrical compositions in rhythmic movements. He and his painter friend Hans Richter submitted this idea to Ufa, and Ufa, guided as ever by the maxim that art is good business or, at least, good propaganda, enabled the two artists to go ahead with their experiments. The first abstract films appeared in 1921. While Eggeling he died in 1925 orchestrated spiral lines and comblike figures in a short he called DIAGONAL SYMPHONY, Richter composed his RHYTHM 21 of squares in black, gray and white. One year later, Walter Ruttmann, also a painter, joined in the trend with OPUS I, which was a dynamic display of spots vaguely recalling X-ray photographs. As the titles reveal, the authors themselves con- sidered their products a sort of optical music. It was a music that, whatever else it tried to impart, marked an utter withdrawal from the outer world. This esoteric avant- garde movement soon spread over other countries. From about 1924, such advanced French artists as Fernand Le"ger and Rene* Glair made films which, less abstract than the German ones, showed an affinity for the formal beauty of machine parts, and molded all kinds of objects and motions into surrealistic dreams. I feel indebted to Mr. Hans Richter for having permitted me to use his unpublished manuscript, "Avantgarde, History and Dates of the Only Independent Artistic Film Movement, 1921-1981." See also Film Society Programme, Oct. 16, 1927; Kurtz, Expr6*toniamu$, pp. 86, 94; Vin- cent, Histoire de VArt Qintmatographique, pp. 159-61; Man Ray, "Answer to a Ques- tionnaire," Film Art, no. 7, 1980, p. 9; Kraszna-Krausz, "Exhibition in Stuttgart, June 1929, and Its Effects," Close Up, Dec. 1929, pp. 461-62. CALIGARI 69 jagged, sharp-pointed forms strongly reminiscent of gothic pat- terns. Products of a style which by then had become almost a mannerism, these complexes suggested houses, walls, landscapes. Ex- cept for a few slips or concessions some backgrounds opposed the pictorial convention in too direct a manner, while others all but pre- served them the settings amounted to a perfect transformation of material objects into emotional ornaments. With its oblique chimneys on pell-mell roofs, its windows in the form of arrows or kites and its treelike arabesques that were threats rather than trees, Holstenwall resembled those visions of unheard-of cities which the painter Lyonel Feininger evoked through his edgy, crystalline compositions. 11 In addition, the ornamental system in CAXJGARI expanded through space, annuling its conventional aspect by means of painted shadows in disharmony with the lighting effects, and zigzag delineations designed to efface all rules of perspective. Space now dwindled to a flat plane, now augmented its dimensions to become what one writer called a "stereoscopic universe." 12 Lettering was introduced as an essential element of the settings appropriately enough, considering the close relationship between let- tering and drawing. In one scene the mad psychiatrist's desire to imitate Caligari materializes in jittery characters composing the words "I must become Caligari" words that loom before his eyes on the road, in the clouds, in the treetops. The incorporation of human beings and their movements into the texture of these sur- roundings was tremendously difficult. Of all the players only the two protagonists seemed actually to be created by a draf tman's imagina- tion. Werner Krauss as Caligari had the appearance of a phantom magician himself weaving the lines and shades through which he 11 Mr. Feininger wrote to me about his relation to CAUGASI on Sept. 18, 1944: "Thank you for your . . . letter of Sept 8. But if there has been anything I never had a part in nor the slightest knowledge of at the time, it is the film CAUGA&I. I have never even seen the film. ... I never met nor knew the artists you name [Warm, Rohrig and Reimann] who devised the settings. Some time about 1911 1 made, for my own edifica- tion, a series of drawings which I entitled: *Die Stadt am Ende der Welt' Some of these drawings were printed, some were exhibited. Later, after the birth of CALIOABI, I was frequently asked whether I had had a hand in its devising. This is all I can tell you. . . ." 12 Cited by Carter, The New Spirit, p. 250, from H. G. Scheffauer, The New Spirit in the German Arts. For the CAIIGARI dcor, see also Kurtz, Expressionisms, p. 66; Rotha, Film TUl Now, p. 46; Jahier, "42 Ans de Cinema," Le Rdle intellectual du Cinema,, pp. 60-61; "The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari," Exceptional Photoplays, March 1921, p. 4; Amiguet, Gvntmal CintmaJ, p. 50. For the beginnings of Werner Krauss and Conrad Veidt, see Kalbus, Deutsche FUmkwut, I, 28, 80, and Veidt, "Mein Leben," UfarMaga&fa, Jan. 14r-20, 1927. 70 THE POSTWAR PERIOD paced, and when Conrad Veidt's Cesare prowled along a wall, it wa& as if the wall had exuded him [Illus. 3]. The figure of an old dwarf and the crowd's antiquated costumes helped to remove the throng on the fair's tent-street from reality and make it share the bizarre life of abstract forms. If Decla had chosen to leave the original story of Mayer and Janowitz as it was, these "drawings brought to life" would have told it perfectly. As expressionist abstractions they were animated by the same revolutionary spirit that impelled the two scriptwriters to accuse authority the kind of authority revered in Germany of inhuman excesses. However, Wiene's version disavowed this rev- olutionary meaning of expressionist staging, or, at least, put it, like the original story itself, in brackets. In the film CALIGARI expression- ism seems to be nothing more than the adequate translation of a madman's fantasy into pictorial terms. This was how many contem- porary German reviewers understood, and relished, the settings and gestures. One of the critics stated with self-assured ignorance: "The idea of rendering the notions of sick brains . . . through expres- sionist pictures is not only well conceived but also well realized. Here this style has a right to exist, proves an outcome of solid logic." 1S In their triumph the philistines overlooked one significant fact: even though CAUGARI stigmatized the oblique chimneys as crazy, it never restored the perpendicular ones as the normal. Expressionist ornaments also- overrun the film's concluding episode, in which, from the philistines' viewpoint, perpendiculars should have been expected to characterize the revival of conventional reality. In consequence, the CALIGARI style was as far from depicting madness as it was from transmitting revolutionary messages. What function did it really assume? During the postwar years expressionism was frequently con- sidered a shaping of primitive sensations and experiences. Gerhart Hauptmann's brother Carl a distinguished writer and poet with ex- pressionist inclinations adopted this definition, and then asked how the spontaneous manifestations of a profoundly agitated soul might best be formulated. While modern language, he contended, is too perverted to serve this purpose, the film or the bioscop, as he termed it offers a unique opportunity to externalize the fermentation of inner life. Of course, he said, the bioscop must feature only those " Review In 8 Uhr Abendblatt, cited In Caligari-Heft, p. 8. CALIGARI 71 gestures of things and of human beings which are truly soul- ful. 14 Carl Hauptmann's views elucidate the expressionist style of CAUGARI. It had the function of characterizing the phenomena on the screen as phenomena of the soul a function which overshadowed its revolutionary meaning. By making the film an outward projec- tion of psychological events, expressionist staging symbolized much more strikingly than did the device of a framing story that general retreat into a shell which occurred in postwar Germany. It is not accidental that, as long as this collective process was effective, odd gestures and settings in an expressionist or similar style marked many a conspicuous film. VARIETY, of 1925, showed the final traces of them. 15 Owing to their stereotyped character, these settings and gestures were like some familiar street sign "Men at Work," for instance. Only here the lettering was different. The sign read: "Soul at Work." After a thorough propaganda campaign culminating in the puz- zling poster "You must become Caligari," Decla released the film in February 1920 in the Berlin Marmorhaus. 16 Among the press re- views they were unanimous in praising CALIGARI as the first work of art on the screen that of Vorwarts, the leading Social Democra- tic Party organ, distinguished itself by utter absurdity. It commented upon the film's final scene, in which the director of the asylum promises to heal Francis, with the words : "This film is also morally invulnerable inasmuch as it evokes sympathy for the mentally dis- eased, and comprehension for the self-sacrificing activity of the psychiatrists and attendants." 1T Instead of recognizing that Francis' attack against an odious authority harmonized with the Party's own antiauthoritarian doctrine, Vorwarts preferred to pass off authority itself as a paragon of progressive virtues. It was always the same psychological mechanism: the rationalized middle-class propensities of the Social Democrats interfering with their rational socialist de- signs. While the Germans were too close to CALIGARI to appraise its symptomatic value, the French realized that this film was more than just an exceptional film. They coined the term "Cdigarisme" and 14 Carl Hauptmann, "Film und Theater," Der Film von Morgen, p. 20. See also Alten, "Die Kunst in Deutschland," Ganymed, 1920, p. 146; Kurtz, Expressionism, p. 14. Cf. p. 127. " Jahrbuch der Filmindustrie, 1922/8, p. 81. 17 Quoted from OaligarirHeft, p. 28. 72 THE POSTWAR PERIOD applied it to a postwar world seemingly all upside down ; which, at any rate, proves that they sensed the film's bearing on the structure of society. The New York premiere of CALIGABI, in April 1921, firmly established its world fame. But apart from giving rise to stray imitations and serving as a yardstick for artistic endeavors, this "most widely discussed film of the time" never seriously influenced the course of the American or French cinema. 18 It stood out lonely, like a monolith. CALIGARI shows the "Soul at Work." On what adventures does the revolutionized soul embark? The narrative and pictorial elements of the film gravitate towards two opposite poles. One can be labeled "Authority," or, more explicitly, "Tyranny." The theme of tyranny, with which the authors were obsessed, pervades the screen from begin- ning to end. Swivel-chairs of enormous height symbolize the superior- ity of the city officials turning on them, and, similarly, the gigantic back of the chair in Alan's attic testifies to the invisible presence of powers that have their grip on him. Staircases reinforce the effect of the furniture: numerous steps ascend to police headquarters, and in the lunatic asylum itself no less than three parallel flights of stairs are called upon to mark Dr. Caligari's position at the top of the hier- archy [Ulus. 4], That the film succeeds in picturing him as a tyrant figure of the stamp of Homunculus and Lubitsch's Henry VIII is substantiated by a most illuminating statement in Joseph Freeman's novel, Never Call Retreat. Its hero, a Viennese professor of his- tory, tells of his life in a German concentration camp where, after being tortured, he is thrown into a cell: "Lying alone in that cell, I thought of Dr. Caligari; then, without transition, of the Em- peror Valentinian, master of the Roman world, who took great de- light in imposing the death sentence for slight or imaginary offenses. This Caesar's favorite expressions were : 'Strike off his head !' 'Burn him alive!' 'Let him be beaten with clubs till he expires !' I thought what a genuine twentieth century ruler the emperor was, and promptly fell asleep." 19 This dreamlike reasoning penetrates Dr. Caligari to the core by conceiving him as a counterpart of Valen- tinian and a premonition of Hitler. Caligari is a very specific premo- nition in the sense that he uses hypnotic power to force his will upon his tool a technique foreshadowing, in content and purpose, that "Quotation from Jacobs, American Film, p. 803; see also pp. 804-5. 19 Freeman, Never Call Retreat, p. 528, CALIGAEI 73 manipulation of the soul which Hitler was the first to practice on a gigantic scale. Even though, at the time of CAuaARi, the motif of the masterful hypnotizer was not unknown on the screen it played a prominent role in the American film TRILBY, shown in Berlin during the war nothing in their environment invited the two authors to feature it. 20 They must have been driven by one of those dark im- pulses which, stemming from the slowly moving foundations of a people's life, sometimes engender true visions. One should expect the pole opposing that of tyranny to be the pole of freedom; for it was doubtless their love of freedom which made Janowitz and Mayer disclose the nature of tyranny. Now this counterpole is the rallying-point of elements pertaining to the fair the fair with its rows of tents, its confused crowds besieging them, and its diversity of thrilling amusements. Here Francis and Alan happily join the swarm of onlookers; here, on the scene of his tri- umphs, Dr. Caligari is finally trapped. In their attempts to define the character of a fair, literary sources repeatedly evoke the memory of Babel and Babylon alike. A seventeenth century pamphlet de- scribes the noise typical of a fair as "such a distracted noise that you would think Babel not comparable to it," and, almost two hundred years later, a young English poet feels enthusiastic about "that Babylon of booths the Fair." 21 The manner in which such Biblical images insert themselves unmistakably characterizes the fair as an enclave of anarchy in the sphere of entertainment. This accounts for its eternal attractiveness. People of all classes and ages enjoy losing themselves in a wilderness of glaring colors and shrill sounds, which is populated with monsters and abounding in bodily sensations from violent shocks to tastes of incredible sweetness. For adults it is a regression into childhood days, in which games and serious affairs are identical, real and imagined things mingle, and anarchical desires aimlessly test infinite possibilities. By means of this regression the adult escapes a civilization which tends to overgrow and starve out the chaos of instincts escapes it to restore that chaos upon which civilization nevertheless rests. The fair is not freedom, but anarchy entailing chaos. Significantly, most fair scenes in CALIGABI open with a small iris- in exhibiting an organ-grinder whose arm constantly rotates, and, behind him, the top of a merry-go-round which never ceases its cir- a Kalbus, Deutsche FUmkwut, I, 95. ai McKechnie, Popular Entertainments, pp. 88, 47. 74 THE POSTWAR PERIOD cular movement. 22 The circle here becomes a symbol of chaos. While freedom resembles a river, chaos resembles a whirlpool. Forgetful of self, one may plunge into chaos; one cannot move on in it. That the two authors selected a fair with its liberties as contrast to the^ oppres- sions of Caligari betrays the flaw in their revolutionary aspirations. Much as they longed for freedom, they were apparently incapable of imagining its contours. There is something Bohemian in their conception ; it seems the product of naive idealism rather than true insight. But it might be said that the fair faithfully reflected the chaotic condition of postwar Germany. Whether intentionally or not, CALIGARI exposes the soul wavering between tyranny and chaos, and facing a desperate situation: any escape from tyranny seems to throw it into a state of utter confusion. Quite logically, the film spreads an all-pervading atmosphere of horror. Like the Nazi world, that of CAMGARI overflows with sinister portents, acts of terror and outbursts of panic. The equation of horror and hopelessness comes to a climax in the final episode which pretends to re-establish normal life. Except for the ambiguous figure of the director and the shadowy members of his staff, normality realizes itself through the crowd of insane moving in their bizarre surroundings. The normal as a madhouse: frustration could not be pictured more finally. And in this film, as well as in HOMUNCUI/CTS, is unleashed a strong sadism and an appetite for destruction. 28 The reappearance of these traits on the screen once more testifies to their prominence in the German collective soul. Technical peculiarities betray peculiarities of meaning. In GARI methods begin to assert themselves which belong among the special properties of German film technique. CALIGARI initiates a long procession of 100 per cent studio-made films. Whereas, for in- stance, the Swedes at that time went to great pains to capture the actual appearance of a snowstorm or a wood, the German directors, at least until 1924, were so infatuated with indoor effects that they built up whole landscapes within the studio walls. They preferred the command of an artificial universe to dependence upon a hap- hazard outer world. Their withdrawal into the studio was part of M Rotha, Film Till Now, p. 285. For the role of fairs in films, sec E. W. and M. M. Robson, The Film Antwers Back, pp. 196-97. An iris-in is a technical term for opening up the scene from a small circle of light in a dark screen until the whole frame is revealed. Cf . p. 88. CALIGARI 75 the general retreat into a shell. Once the Germans had determined to seek shelter within the soul, they could not well allow the screen to explore that very reality which they abandoned. This explains the conspicuous role of architecture after CALIGARI a role that has struck many an observer. "It is of the utmost importance," Paul Rotha remarks in a survey of the postwar period, "to grasp the significant part played by the architect in the development of the German cinema." 24 How could it be otherwise? The architect's fa$ades and rooms were not merely backgrounds, but hieroglyphs. They expressed the structure of the soul in terms of space. CAUGARI also mobilizes light. It is a lighting device which enables the spectators to watch the murder of Alan without seeing it; what they see, on the wall of the student's attic, is the shadow of Cesare stabbing that of Alan. Such devices developed into a specialty of the German studios. Jean Cassou credits the Germans with having in- vented a "laboratory-made fairy illumination," 25 and Harry Alan Potamkin considers the handling of the light in the German film its "major contribution to the cinema." 26 This emphasis upon light can be traced to an experiment Max Reinhardt made on the stage shortly before CAUGARI. In his mise-en-scdne of Sorge's prewar drama The Beggar (Der Eettler) one of the earliest and most vigorous mani- festations of expressionism he substituted for normal settings imaginary ones created by means of lighting effects. 27 Reinhardt doubtless introduced these effects to be true to the drama's style. The analogy to the films of the postwar period is obvious: it was their expressionist nature which impelled many a German director of photography to breed shadows as rampant as weeds and associate ethereal phantoms with strangely lit arabesques or faces. These ef- forts were designed to bathe all scenery in an unearthly illumination marking it as scenery of the soul. c *Light has breathed soul into the expressionist films," Rudolph Kurtz states in his book on the ex- pressionist cinema. 28 Exactly the reverse holds true: in those films the soul was the virtual source of the light. The task of switching on this inner illumination was somewhat facilitated by powerful romantic traditions. 94 Rotha, Film TiU Now, p. 180. Cf. Potamldn, "Kino and Lichtspiel," Close Up, Nov. 1929, p. 887. a6 Cited in Leprohon, "Le Cindma AUemand," Le Rouge et le Noir, July 1928, p. 185. a Potamkin, "The Rise and Fall of the German Film,** Cinema, April 1980, p. 24. a7 Kurtz, Eapretfionismu*, p. 59. /6W.,p. 60. 76 THE POSTWAR PERIOD The attempt made in CALIGARI to co-ordinate settings, players, lighting and action is symptomatic of the sense of structural organ- ization which, from this film on, manifests itself on the German screen. Rotha coins the term "studio constructivism" to characterize "that curious air of completeness, of finality, that surrounds each product of the German studios." 2d But organizational completeness can be achieved only if the material to be organized does not object to it. (The ability of the Germans to organize themselves owes much to their longing for submission.) Since reality is essentially incalcu- lable and therefore demands to be observed rather than commanded, realism on the screen and total organization exclude each other. Through their "studio constructivism" no less than their lighting the German films revealed that they dealt with unreal events dis- played in a sphere basically controllable. 80 In the course of a visit to Paris about six years after the premiere of CALIGABI, Janowitz called on Count Etienne de Beaumont in his old city residence, where he lived among Louis Seize furniture and Picassos. The Count voiced his admiration of CAUOABI, terming it "as fascinating and abstruse as the German soul." He continued: "Now the time has come for the German soul to speak, Monsieur. The French soul spoke more than a century ago, in the Revolution, and' you have been mute. . . . Now we are waiting for what you have to impart to us, to the world." 81 The Count did not have long to wait. Rotha, Film Till Now, pp. 107-8. Cf . Potamkin, "Kino and Lichtspiel," Clot* Up, Nov. 1929, p. 888, and "The Rise and Fall of the German Film," Cinema, April 1930, p. 24. 30 Film connoisseurs have -repeatedly criticized CAIIGARI for being a stage imita- tion. This aspect of the film partly results from its genuinely theatrical action. It is action of a well-constructed dramatic conflict in stationary surroundings action which does not depend upon screen representation for significance. Like CALIOARI, all "indoor" Alms of the postwar period showed affinity for the stage in that they favored inner-life dramas at the expense of conflicts involving outer reality. How- ever, this did not necessarily prevent them from growing into true films. When, in the wake of CALIOARI, film technique steadily progressed, the psychological screen dramas increasingly exhibited an imagery that elaborated the significance of their action. CAUGARI'S theatrical affinity was also due to technical backwardness. An immovable camera focused upon the painted decor; no cutting device added a meaning of its own to that of the pictures. One should, of course, not forget the reciprocal influence CALIGABI and kindred films exerted, for their part, on the German stage. Stimulated by the use they made of the iris-in, stage lighting took to singling out a lone player, or some important sector of the scene. Cf. Barry, Program, Notes, Series III, pro- gram 1; Gregor, ZeitalUr d8 Films, pp. 184, 144-45; Rotha, Film Till Now, p. 2T5; Vincent, Hittoire d* I' Art CinJmatographique, p. 189. 31 From Janowitz's manuscript. 6. PROCESSION OF TYRANTS CALIGARI was too high-brow to become popular in Germany. How- ever, its basic theme the soul being faced with the seemingly un- avoidable alternative of tyranny or chaos exerted extraordinary fascination. Between 1920 and 1924, numerous German films insist- ently resumed this theme, elaborating it in various fashions. One group specialized in the depiction of tyrants. In this film type, the Germans of the time a people still unbalanced, still free to choose its regime nursed no illusions about the possible conse- quences of tyranny ; on the contrary, they indulged in detailing its crimes and the sufferings it inflicted. Was their imagination kindled by the fear of bolshevism? Or did they call upon these frightful visions to exorcise lusts which, they sensed, were their own and now threatened to possess them? (It is, at any rate, a strange coincidence that, hardly more than a decade later, Nazi Germany was to put into practice that very mixture of physical and mental tortures which the German screen then pictured.) Among the films of this first group, NOSFERATU, released in 1922, enjoyed particular fame for initiating the fashion of screen vam- pires. The film was an adaptation of Bram Stoker's novel Dracula, but Henrik Galeen, the script writer, managed to impregnate it with ideas of his own. A real estate agent in Bremen sends his recently married clerk to Nosferatu, who, living far away in the Carpathian woods, wants to settle some business matter. The clerk's travel across these woods macabre with mists, shying horses, wolves and eerie birds proves but an innocent prelude to the adventures awaiting him in Nosferatu's castle. The day after his arrival he wanders, in search of his host, through abandoned rooms and cellars, and eventually discovers Nos- feratu lying in a sarcophagus like a corpse with eyes wide open in a ghastly face. Nosferatu is a vampire, and vampires sleep by day. By night the monster approaches the slumbering clerk to suck his blood. 77 78 THE POSTWAR PERIOD At this very moment Nina, the clerk's wife, awakens in Bremen with the name of her hushand on her lips, whereupon Nosferatu with- draws from his victim. It was Galeen's idea to demonstrate through this telepathic phenomenon the supernatural power of love. After the clerk's escape, the vampire, who comes to appear more and more as an incarnation of pestilence, leaves his castle to haunt the world. Wherever he emerges, rats swarm out and people fall dead. He goes aboard a sailing ship: the crew dies, and the ship continues cut- ting the waves on its own. Finally Nosferatu makes his entrance in Bremen and there meets Nina in an episode which symbolizes Galeen's credo that the deadly evils for which Nosferatu stands can- not defeat those who encounter them fearlessly. Instead of fleeing the vampire's presence, Nina, her arms extended, welcomes him into her room. As she does so, a supreme miracle occurs : the sun breaks through, and the vampire dissolves into thin air x [Illus. 5]. P. W. Murnau, who directed NOSFERATTT, had already a few films to his credit among them JANTJSKOPF (JANUS-FACED, 1920), a version of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde; SCHXOSS VOGELOD (VOGELOD CASTLE, 1921) , a crime picture visibly influenced by the Swedes ; and the realistic farm drama BBENNENDER ACKER (BUKNDTG SOIL, 1922) , in which he is said to have furthered the action through sus- tained close shots of facial expressions. In VOGELOD CASTLE, too, he knowingly used faces to reveal emotional undercurrents and orches- trate suspense. This early film moreover testified to Murnau's unique faculty of obliterating the boundaries between the real and the unreal. Reality in his films was surrounded by a halo of dreams and presentiments, and a tangible person might suddenly impress the audience as a mere apparition. 2 Bela Balazs, a German film writer of Hungarian descent, wrote in 1924 that it was as if "a chilly draft from doomsday" passed through the scenes of NOSFERATTJ. S To obtain this effect Murnau and his cameraman, Fritz Arno Wagner, used all kinds of tricks. Strips of negative film presented the Carpathian woods as a maze of ghostlike white trees set against a black sky ; shots taken in the 1 Based on information offered by Mr. Galeen, who also permitted me to use the manuscript of his lecture on the fantastic film. Cf. Film Society Programme, Dec. 16, 1928; Dreyfus, "Films d'epouvante," Revue du Otee'ma, May 1, 1980, p. 29 5 Vincent, Hiatoire de PArt Cindmatoffraphique, p. 101. a Vincent, ibid,, p. 151; "Auch Murnau . . ," FUwwelt, March 22, 1981; "Der Regisseur F. W. Muxnau," Ufa-Magazin, Oct. 15-21, 1926; Kalbus, Deutsche Fitm- kunst, I, 58. Balazs, Der tichtbare Mentch, p. 108., PROCESSION OF TYRANTS 79 "one-turn-one-picture" manner transformed the clerk's coach into a phantom vehicle uncannily moving along by jerks. The most impres- sive episode was that in which the spectral ship glided with its terrible freight over phosphorescent waters. It is noteworthy that such an amount of picture sense and technical ingenuity served the sole pur- pose of rendering horrors. Of course, film sensations of this kind are short-lived; at the end of 1928, the Film Society in London revived the film with the remark that it "combined the ridiculous and the horrid." 4 When speaking of NOSFERATTT, the critics, even more than in the case of CALIGARI, insisted upon bringing in E. T, A. Hoffmann. 5 However, this reference to the film's romantic antecedents does not account for its specific meaning. The horrors NOSFEBATTJ spreads are caused by a vampire identified with pestilence. Does he embody the pestilence, or is its image evoked to characterize him? If he were simply the embodiment of destructive nature, Nina's interference with his activities would be nothing more than magic, meaningless in this context. Like Attila, Nosferatu is a "scourge of God," and only as such identifiable with the pestilence. He is a blood-thirsty, blood-sucking tyrant figure looming in those regions where myths and fairy tales meet. It is highly significant that during this period German imagination, regardless of its starting-point, always gravi- tated towards such figures as if under the compulsion of hate-love. The conception that great love might force tyranny into retreat, symbolized by Nina's triumph over Nosferatu, will be discussed later. 6 VANISTA, also released in 1922, dwelt upon the psychological causes and effects of tyranny. Carl Mayer, who fashioned the script after Stendhal's story Vanma Vanmi, termed the film a "ballad." The Germans had then a penchant for ballads and legends, which, because of their unreal character, were as timely as the expressionist films proper. This predilection for an imagined world was early recognized and praised as a German feature. "The strength of the German film lies in the fantastic drama," the program-magazine of the Ufa theaters contended in 1921, lest its readers worry about the 4 Film Society Programme, Dec. 16, 1928. See also Rotha, Film Till Now, pp. 197, 276; Oswell Blakeston, "Comment and Review," Close 17eut*ohe Ftimkunst, I, 70; "Peter the Great," Exceptional Photoplays, Feb-March 1924, pp. 1-2. ia Lang, "Kitsch Sensation Kultur und Film," Kultwrfllmbuch, p. 80. Accord- ing to Jahrbuch der FUmmdustrie, 1922/8, p. 46, the film's London premiere was a big success. 82 THE POSTWAR PERIOD cutor, who is determined to track down the mystery man. Wenk has found an able helper in the degenerate Countess Told, while Mabuse relies on his mistress, Cara Carozza, a dancer slavishly devoted to him. A gigantic duel takes place : it is set against a background of swanky gambling haunts, and involves a considerable amount of violence and cunning. In its course Mabuse abducts the countess, with whom he has fallen in love, ruins her husband systematically, and orders the jailed Cara to poison herself, which she gladly does. It looks as if Mabuse is to triumph, for, after two unsuccessful attempts on Wenk's life, he finally hypnotizes him into a suicidal state : Wenk drives his car at high speed towards a perilous quarry. However, the police intervene in time, and, led by Wenk, storm Mabuse ? s house, kill the members of the gang and free the countess. Where is Mabuse himself? Days afterwards, they find him, a raving maniac, in the secret cellar which served the blind counter- feiters as a workshop. Like Caligari, Mabuse has gone mad. 13 Owing to its two parts, the film is of an extraordinary length a dollar-dreadful rather than a penny-dreadful. Trash need not be untrue to life ; on the contrary, life may culminate in heaps of trash, such as no writer could ever amass. However, instead of making DR. MABUSE reflect familiar surroundings, Lang frequently stages the action in settings of pronounced artificiality. Now the scene is an expressionist club-room with painted shadows on the wall, now a dark back street through which Cesare might have slipped with Jane in his arms. Other decorative forms help these expressionist ones to mark the whole as an emotional vision. DR. MABUSE belongs in the CALIGARI sphere [Dlus. 6]. It is by no means a documentary film, but it is a document of its time. The world it pictures has fallen prey to lawlessness and deprav- ity. A night-club dancer performs in a dcor composed of outright sex symbols. Orgies are an institution, homosexuals and prostitute children are everyday characters. The anarchy smoldering in this world manifests itself clearly in the admirably handled episode of the police attack against Mabuse's house an episode which through its imagery intentionally recalls the tumultuous postwar months with their street fights between Spartacus and the Noske troops. Circular ornaments emerge prominently time and again. Both the tricky floor in a new gambling club and the chain of hands formed during a 13 Program brochure to the film; Deeto-Biotcop Verltfh-Progrcvmme* 1928. pp. 10-14. PROCESSION OF TYRANTS 83 spiritualist stance are shown from above to impress their circular appearance upon the spectator. Here, as in the case of CAJLIGABI, the circle denotes a state of chaos. 14 The relation between Dr. Mabuse and this chaotic world is re- vealed by a shot to which Rudolf Arnheim has drawn attention. A small bright spot, Mabuse's face gleams out of the jet-black screen, then, with frightening speed, rushes to the foreground and fills the whole frame, his cruel, strong-willed eyes fastened upon the audi- ence. 15 This shot characterizes Mabuse as a creature of darkness, devouring the world he overpowers. Much as Mabuse resembles Caligari, he surpasses him in that he continually changes his identity. Commenting upon this film, Lang once remarked that he was guided by the idea of rendering the whole of society, with Mabuse every- where present but nowhere recognizable. The film succeeds in making of Mabuse an omnipresent threat which cannot be localized, and thus reflects society under a tyrannical regime that kind of society in which one fears everybody because anybody may be the tyrant's ear or arm. Throughout the film Mabuse is stigmatized as a man of genius who has become Public Enemy No. 1. The final scene depicts the outbreak of his madness in grandiose terms. Trapped in the cellar, Mabuse finds himself surrounded by all the persons he murdered pale apparitions who urge him to join their company and cheat at cards. In the middle of the game the ghosts vanish; whereupon the lonely Mabuse amuses himself by throwing scores of banknotes into the air. They flutter about, flow around him. In vain, he tries to fend them off. Then Wenk arrives. . . . Wenk himself is scarcely more than a smart representative of the law, a kind of legal gangster, with the police functioning as his gang. Unlike Francis, who pursues Caligari for strong and just reasons, Wenk is morally so indifferent that his triumph lacks significance. To be sure, Mabuse is wrecked; but social depravity continues, and other Mabuses may follow. Here as well as in CALIGARI not the slightest allusion to true freedom interferes with the persistent alternative of tyranny or chaos. DE. MABXJSE adds to CALIGARI only in one respect: it attempts to show how closely tyranny and chaos are interrelated. The program brochure Decla-Bioscop published on the occasion of the film's premiere describes the Mabuse world as follows : "Mankind, swept " Cf . p. 74. " Arnheim, Film dU Kunat, p. 124. 84 THE POSTWAR PERIOD about and trampled down in the wake of war and revolution, takes revenge for years of anguish by indulging in lusts . . . and by passively or actively surrendering to crime." 16 That is, chaos breeds tyrants like Mabuse who, for their part, capitalize on chaos. One should not overlook the seemingly harmless word "and" through which the prospectus chooses to connect the weighty terms White, "Film Chronicle i F. W. Murnau," Sound $ Horn, July-Sept. 1981, p. 581. 31 For these films, see Zaddach, Der ttteraritohe Film, pp. 42-48, 58; Kalbus, Deutsche FilmTcunst, I, 72-78; Decla-Bioscop Verleih-Prograirvme, 1928, pp. 64-67. aa "Rose Bernd,** National Board of Review Magazine, Feb. 1927, p. 16. 83 Barrett, "Grey Magic," National Board of Review Magazine, Dec. 1926, pp. 4-6. Films in a similar vein were SAPPHO (MA LOVB, 1921) see Ufa VerUih-Progranvme, 1928, p. 17 and Lupu Pick's WITDENTO (TEDE Wm> DUCK, 1925). For the latter film, see Film Society Programme, NOT. 18, 1928. 9. CRUCIAL, DILEMMA THE German soul, haunted by the alternative images of tyrannic rule and instinct-governed chaos, threatened by doom on either side, tossed about in gloomy space like the phantom ship in NOSFERATTT. While tyrant and instinct films were still flourishing, the German screen began to offer films manifesting an intense inner desire to find a way out of the dilemma. It was a desire pervading the whole sphere of consciousness. Whoever lived through those crucial years in Ger- many will remember the craving for a spiritual shelter which pos- sessed the young, the intellectuals. The Church won over many, and the enthusiasm these converts manifested over their newly acquired security contrasted strangely with the attempt by a group of young men born in the Catholic faith to influence ecclesiastic policy in favor of leftist tendencies. There is also no doubt that the increase of communist sympathizers was in part the result of the spell the orthodox character of the Marxist doctrine cast over many mentally unprotected who were in search of a solid refuge. In their dread of being left in the open, scores of people rushed to mushroom prophets, who were to sink into oblivion a few years later. The theosophist Rudolf Steiner was a particular rage of the time; he resembled Hitler in that he zealously advertised inflated visions in execrable, petty-bourgeois German. On the screen diverse efforts were being made to discover a modus vivendi, a tenable pattern of inner existence. Two films by Lrudwig Berger, both released in 1923, are typical of one of these attempts : EIN GLAS WASSEB (A GLASS OF WATER), fashioned after Scribe's comedy of that title, and DER VERLORENE SCHTTH (CKSTDERELLA), which transferred the ancient fairy tale to the screen with many arabesques and detours. 1 To justify the choice of such bright sub- jects in so dark a world, Berger cited the Romantics as a precedent. 1 Programs to these films. For CXKIXEXBXXA, see also Film Society Programme, Nov. 22, 1925. 107 108 THE POSTWAR PERIOD In the prospectus of A GLASS OF WATER he wrote: "In times of mis- ery and oppression even more than in times of security and wealth, we long for serenity and light play. There has been much talk about the 'flight of the Romantics.' But what outwardly appeared to be a flight^ was in reality the deepest self-examination . . . , was food and strength during decades of external poverty, and at the same time a bridge to a better future." 2 Berger's reference to the Roman- tics only emphasizes the escapist character of his own products. While inflation grew all-devouring and political passion was at its height, these films provided the illusion of a never-never land in which the poor salesgirl triumphs over the conniving queen, and the kind fairy godmother helps Cinderella win Prince Charming. It was, of course, enjoyable to forget harsh reality in tender daydreams, and CINDERELLA in particular satisfied the longing for "serenity and light play" by concocting, with the aid of special cinematic devices, a sweet mixture of human affairs and supernatural miracles. How- ever, this never-never land was not beyond the range of politics. Both films developed within settings staged by Rudolf Bam- berger in the warm and gay style of South German baroque set- tings of a pronounced symmetry, to which Paul Rotha early drew attention. "Doorways, windows, gateways, alley-ways, etc., were always set in the centre of the screen, the remainder of the composi- tion moving about them." 8 This baroque dcor, with its stress on symmetry, conveyed the spirit of patriarchal absolutism reigning in the old Catholic principalities : the two films conceived the "better future" as a return to the good old days. Berger was not wrong in leaning on the Romantics; they, too, inclined to glorify the past, and in consequence had strong affiliations with the traditional powers flllus. 16]. These films were pleasant digressions. But their inherent romanticism was unable to meet the wants of a collective mind defi- nitely expelled from that baroque paradise. A second effort to establish an adequate psychological pattern consisted in the suggestion that all suffering springing from tyranny or chaos should be endured and overcome in the spirit of Christlike love. This suggestion recommended itself by its implication that inner metamorphosis counts more than any transformation of the outer world an implication justifying the aversion of the middle a Program brochure to A GLASS or WATEB. a Rotha, Film Till Now, p. 199. CRUCIAL DILEMMA 109 class to social and political changes. Here it becomes clear why, in NOSFERATTT, Nina's love alone succeeds in defeating the vampire, and why, in DESTINY, the girl's union with her lover in the hereafter is made dependent upon her supreme self-sacrifice. 4 It was the solu- tion of Dostoievsky. His works edited by Moeller van den Bruck, who supplied the Nazis with the basic concept of the "Third Reich" were then so popular with the middle class that their red covers adorned every drawing room. What James T. Farrell writes about The Brothers Karamazov also applies to this emotional trend in post- war Germany : "The revolution will only produce catastrophe. Man must suffer. The noblest man is he who suffers not only for himself but for all his fellow-men. Since the world cannot be changed, man must be changed by love." 5 As early as 1920, a fragment of the Karamazov novel was transferred to the screen. 6 Robert Wiene seized upon Crime and Punishment; his RASKOLNIKOW (CRIME AND PUNISHMENT), released in 1928, was performed by a group of the Moscow Art Players adapting themselves to stylized settings remin- iscent of CALIGARI. Conspicuous are the scenes in which Raskol- nikow indulges in self -accusing fantasies before the judge; a spider's web ornamenting the corner of a wall actively participates in the "physiognomic duel" between the oily judge and the delirious mur- derer. 7 Other films, too, plunged into the depths of religious experience. With the aid of Asta Nielsen, Henny Porten, Werner Krauss and Gregori Chmara, Robert Wiene staged LN.R.L (1923), a passion play that was framed by scenes showing a murderer sentenced to death. Meditating on the story of Christ's Passion, the murderer he has shot a minister to free his people from oppression comes to abjure his revolutionary methods. 8 The political significance of many a religious conversion could not have been exhibited more directly. In a similar vein were several balladlike films with a certain Dos- * Cf. pp. 79, 90. 8 Farrell, Dostoievsky and *The Brothers Karamazov' Revalued," New York Times Book Review, Jan. 9, 1944, p. 28. 6 DIE BRUDER KARAMASOFF (THE BROTHERS KARAMAZOV), directed by Carl Froelich. Cf. Zaddach, Der Uterarische Film, pp. 38-39; Amiguet, Cinema! CintmaJ, p. 50. 7 "Crime and Punishment," National Board of Review Magazine, June 1927, pp. 10-11; Film Society Programme, Dec. 20, 1925; Vincent, Histoire de VArt Gme 1 - matographigwe, p. 145; Kurtz, Expressionismus, pp. 75, 76, 78. A similar "physiog- nomic duel" this phrase was coined by Balazs occurred in Joe May's DIE TRAGODIE DER LTEBE (LovE TRAGEDY, 1928) ; cf. Balazs, Der sichtbare Mewch, p. 70, and Kurtss, ibid., pp. 7&-79. 6 Film Society Programme, Jan. 8, 1928; Kalbus, Deutsche Filmkuntt, I, 54. 110 THE POSTWAR PERIOD toievsky touch; DEE HENKER VON ST.-MARIEN (THE HANGMAN OF ST.-MAJUEN, 1920), DER GRAF VON CHAROLAIS (THE COUNT OF CHAROLAIS, 1922, a screen version of Richard Beer-Hofmann's play) and DER STEINERNE REITER (THE STONE RIDER, 1923). They demonstrated that true love is capable of working miracles, or that heavenly miracles may intervene in favor of true love. But not- withstanding the relatively broad appeal of these films, the form of inner existence they endorsed proved attainable only to a small, pre- disposed minority. The way of Christlike love was for the Germans a mirage rather than a solution. A third attempt to cope with the existing plight manifested itself through a film genre which was exclusively German: the mountain films. Dr. Arnold Fanck, a native of Freiburg i. Br., discovered this genre and all but monopolized it throughout the republican era. He was originally a geologist infatuated with mountain climbing. In his zeal for spreading the gospel of proud peaks and perilous ascents, Fanck relied increasingly on actors and technicians who were, or became, outstanding alpinists and skiers. Among his foremost col- laborators were Leni Rief enstahl, Luis Trenker and Sepp Allgeier. Mountains had already been featured in HOMUNCULUS and CALIGARI. Homunculus is seen standing on a mountain top when lightning strikes him for blasphemy ; and when Dr. Caligari makes his first appearance, it is as if he emerged from the conical moun- tain towering over Holstenwall and the fair. However, these moun- tains were primarily symbolic, and Fanck was interested in real ones. He began with three films devoted to the joys and beauties of mountain sport: WTTNDER DBS SCHNEESCHUHS (MARVELS OF SKI, 1920), IM KAMPF MIT DEN BERGEN (STRUGGLE WITH THE MOUNTAINS, 1921) and FTTCHSJAGD IM ENGADIN (Fox HUNT IN THE ENGADINE, 1923), a film depicting a paper chase on skis. 10 These films were extraordinary in that they captured the most grandiose aspects of nature at a time when the German screen in general offered nothing but studio-made scenery. In subsequent films, Fanck grew more and more keen on combining precipices and passions, inaccessible steeps and insoluble human conflicts; every year brought a new drama in the mountains. But the fictional ele- 9 For THE HANGMAMT OP ST.-MABIBS-, see Ittuatrterter Film-Kwier; for THE COTOTT OF CHAHOLAM, program to this film; for THE STONE RIDER, Deela-Biosoop VtrUih-Programane, 1928, p. 26. See also Kalbus, Deuttoh* Filmkunst, I, 64, 66. * Kalbus, ibid., p. 91. Cf. Fanck, Eampf mit dem Berge. CRUCIAL DILEMMA 111 ment, rampant as it was, did not interfere with an abundance of documentary shots of the silent world of high altitudes. As docu- ments these films were incomparable achievements. Whoever saw them will remember the glittering white of glaciers against a sky dark in contrast, the magnificent play of clouds forming mountains above the mountains, the ice stalactites hanging down from roofs and windowsills of some small chalet, and, inside crevasses, weird ice structures awakened to iridescent life by the torchlights of a noc- turnal rescue party. The message of the mountains Fanck endeavored to popularize through such splendid shots was the credo of many Germans with academic titles, and some without, including part of the university youth. Long before the first World War, groups of Munich students left the dull capital every weekend for the nearby Bavarian Alps, and there indulged their passion. Nothing seemed sweeter to them than the bare cold rock in the dim light of dawn. Full of Promethean promptings, they would climb up some dangerous "chimney," then quietly smoke their pipes on the summit, and with infinite pride look down on what they called "valley-pigs" those plebeian crowds who never made an effort to elevate themselves to lofty heights. Far from being plain sportsmen or impetuous lovers of majestic panoramas, these mountain climbers were devotees performing the rites of a cult 11 [Illus. 17]. Their attitude amounted to a kind of heroic idealism which, through blindness to more substantial ideals, expended itself in tourist exploits. Fanck's dramas carried this attitude to such an extreme that the uninitiated could not help feeling irritated at the mixture of spar- kling ice-axes and inflated sentiments. In BERG DES SCHICKSALS (PEAK OF DESTINY, 1924), a fanatical mountain climber considers it the mission of his life to conquer the impregnable Guglia del Diavolo. He is killed in action. His son promises the mourning mother never to approach that "peak of destiny." Unfortunately, his sweetheart approaches it, and of course goes astray. As her signals of distress are seen in the village, the mother releases the son from his promise with the words: "If you succeed in rescuing this human life, the death of your father had a meaning." The son 11 This strange cult never falls to puzzle outsiders. In James B. Ullman's pompous mountain novel, The White Tower (p. 72), a Swiss guide says to an American pilot: "We Swissyes, and the English and French and Americans, too we climb moun- tains for sport. But the Germans, no. What it is they climb for I do not know. Only it is not for sport.'* 112 THE POSTWAR PERIOD succeeds and even heightens the meaning of his father's death by setting his foot on the top of the devilish Guglia amidst a terrific blizzard. 12 The conduct of another model mountaineer, featured in DER HEILIGE BERG (THE HOLY MOUNTAIN, 1927), shows that Fanck's fanciful heroes were sometimes able to master their fiery instincts. During a stunt ascent made in the company of his young friend Vigo, this alpinist learns that Vigo is wooing the very girl with whom he himself is in love. In a fit of jealousy, he turns on Vigo, who involuntarily moves backwards and loses his foothold. With his companion hanging in mid-air on the rope that connects them, the alpinist reconsiders and, obedient to the code of mountain climbers, tries to rescue him at the expense of his own life. ls Although this kind of heroism was too eccentric to serve as a pattern for the people in the valleys, it was rooted in a mentality kindred to Nazi spirit. Immaturity and mountain enthusiasm were one. When, in THE HOLY MOUNTAIN, the girl tells Vigo that she is willing to gratify any wish he might express, Vigo goes down on his knees and puts his head in her lap. It is the gesture of the cafe-owner in NEW YEAR'S EVE. In addition, the idolatry of glaciers and rocks was symptomatic of an antirationalism on which the Nazis could capi- talize. Particularly memorable is a fourth attempt at inner adjustment the only progressive one made during the immediate postwar years. It aimed at endowing rational thinking with executive powers, !> that it would be able to dispel the dark inhibitions and unchecked impulses of which the collective soul was possessed. If this attempt to enthrone reason had been successful, reason would have denounced the phantom character of the torturing alternative of tyranny or chaos, and eventually have done away with those traditional authori- tarian dispositions that obstructed true emancipation. But interest in mobilizing reason was apparently so limited that it reached the screen only in two isolated instances, one of which was nothing more than an episode of Wegener's second GOLEM (1920). Professor Polzig had devised the settings for this enlarged ver- sion of the old prewar film. In it the Hapsburg emperor issues an order that the Jews are to be expelled from their ghetto, a dream- ia Program to this film; Kalbus, Deutsche Filmkunst, I, 91. 1S Program to this film. CRUCIAL DILEMMA 113 like maze of crooked streets and stooped houses. To soothe the emperor's mind, Rabbi Loew, by means of magic, conjures up a procession of Biblical figures among them Ahasuerus, who pro- ceeds to trespass on the domain of reality, starting to destroy the imperial palace. The emperor, panic-stricken, agrees to withdraw his order of expulsion if the rabbi will avert the danger; thereupon the latter directs the Golem, his servant, to prevent walls and ceilings from falling down. The Golem obeys with the automatic promptness of a robot [Illus. 18]. Here reason avails itself of brute force as a tool to liberate the oppressed. But instead of following up this motif, the film concentrates upon the Golem's emancipation from his master, and becomes increasingly entangled in half-truths. 14 The other instance of concern with reason was SCHATTEN (WARNING SHADOWS, 1922), which in its German version bore the subtitle "A Nocturnal Hallucination" ("Erne nachtliche Hallazmar tion"). This film, directed by Arthur Robison, resembled Carl Mayer's screen poems in that it involved nameless characters in an all but titleless narration. Similarities of style originate in a simi- larity of theme. To a large extent, WARNING SHADOWS is nothing but an instinct film, which accounts for the marked role assigned in it to the display of lights and shadows. Their marvelous fluctua- tions seem to engender this extraordinary drama. Fashioned after an idea by Albin Grau, the film opens with a few scenes showing a jealous count exasperated at the favors his wife bestows on her four courtiers. One of them, called "the Lover," is on the point of passing beyond the stage of mere hope. While the count and his wife entertain this amorous quartet, a strolling juggler asks permission to present shadow-plays. The juggler soon senses disaster in the air, and discontinues his performance to fore- stall a tragedy arising out of the steady growth of conflicting pas- sions. A sagacious wizard, he removes the shadows cast by the party alongside the table, and simultaneously hypnotizes all six persons, so that they follow their shadows into the realm of the subcon- scious [Ulus. 19]. In a state of trance, they anticipate the future by doing exactly what they would do if their passions continued to determine their actions. The drama develops into a Nocturnal hallucination"; it reaches its climax when the count, mad with 14 "The Golem," Exceptional Photoplays, June 1921, pp. -4; Ufa Verltik-Pro- gramme, 1928, p. 14; Vincent, Histoire de I' Art Cintmatographique, p. 148; Rotha, Film Till Now, p. 284; Barry, Program Notes, Series III, program 1. 114 THE POSTWAR PERIOD jealousy, compels the courtiers to stab his fettered wife. Here again the immaturity of instinct-possessed beings manifests itself in the customary way : the count rests his head on the Lover's chest and weeps bitterly over what has happened. The hallucination ends with the furious courtiers throwing the count out of the window. Then the scene shifts back to the hypnotized party alongside the table, and the shadows are seen returning to their owners, who slowly awaken from their collective nightmare. They are cured. White magic has enabled them to grasp the hidden springs and terrible issue of their present existence. Owing to this magical therapy it recalls model cases of psychoanalytical treatment the count changes from a puerile berserk into a composed adult, his coquettish wife becomes his loving wife, and the Lover takes silent leave. Their metamorphosis at the very end of the film coincides with the beginning of a new day whose sober natural lighting splendidly symbolizes the light of reason. 15 Even though it belongs among the masterpieces of the German screen, WARNING SHADOWS passed almost unnoticed. Contempo- raries may have felt that any acknowledgment of the healthy shock effect of reason was bound to result in an adjustment to the ways of democracy. In a retrospective comment on WARNING SHADOWS, Fritz Arno Wagner, its cameraman, states : * 6 It only found response from the film aesthetes, making no impression on the general pub- lic." ie " Rotha, Fffnt Till Nov>, p. 200; Potamkin, "The Rise and Fall of the German Film," Cinema, April 1980, p. 25. 18 Wagner, "I Believe in the Sound Film," FUm Art, 1986, no. 8, p. 11. 10 FROM REBELLION TO SUBMISSION STILL, another attempt to overcome the unbearable inner dilemma was made during the postwar years. It advocated the resumption of authoritarian behavior, presupposing a mentality that would pre- fer even a tyrannical regime to chaos. Typical of the authoritarian tendency were two films springing from almost opposite camps and reflecting very different surroundings. Despite their discrepancies, both promote the same psychological pattern. One of the two films was FRIDERICTJS REX, an opulent, if cine- matically trivial, Ufa product, released in 1922. No one could overlook its purpose: it was pure propaganda for a restoration of the monarchy. Directed by Arz&n von Cserepy, the film depicted the life of Frederick the Great in a succession of loosely connected epi- sodes, with little regard for historic truth. At the beginning, the young crown prince is seen revolting against the rigorous discipline his father enjoins on him; but instead of exhibiting the rebel's un- patriotic passion for French philosophy and literature, Ufa cun- ningly emphasizes a neutral love affair to demonstrate his sense of independence. Subsequent episodes record his attempt to run away, his arrest and those terrible minutes during which, by order of his father, Frederick witnesses the execution of his friend Katte. Much footage is devoted to displaying the fortunate results of this bar- barian punishment: Frederick submits so completely to his father's will that he even marries the unloved princess of Brunswick-Bevern, whereupon the father closes his eyes with the certitude of leaving behind a worthy successor. That certitude is not belied. No sooner does he ascend the throne, than the former rebel continues the work of his father [Illus. 20]. This screen Frederick is given two major virtues. He appears as the father of his people a patriarchal ruler using his absolute power to mitigate legal hardships, further general welfare and pro- tect the poor from exploitation by the rich. Simultaneously, he appears as the national hero who, through several successful wars, 115 116 THE POSTWAR PERIOD elevates little Prussia to the rank of a great power. The whole construction overtly aims at convincing the audience that another Frederick might not only prove an effective antidote against the virus of socialism, but also realize Germany's national aspirations. To strengthen the emotional ties hetween the audience and this timely figure, Ufa elaborates upon his inner suffering. The episodes of the Seven Years' War characterize Frederick as a tragic genius involved in a seemingly hopeless fight and abandoned by his most reliable followers. In addition, there is a continuous display of mili- tary parades and victorious battles just the kind of spectacle that would elate patriots in distress over the lost war, the disarmament and that odious confusion called democracy. 1 FRIDERICT;S REX was met by heavy opposition in the press. Vorwdrts and the communist Freiheit invited the masses to boycott the film, while the democratic Berlmer Tageblatt called for police intervention. 2 It is also hardly believable that South Germany took a liking to this piece of Prussian self-glorification. However, South Germany was not the Reich, and political protests do not prove much about psychological reactions. During the production of the film, two thousand extras were assigned to cheer the newly crowned king in the courtyard of the Berlin Old Palace (ALtes Schloss). When he stepped out onto the balcony in his regalia, they manifested an enthusiam that could not have been ordered by any director. "Here the people act themselves," an eyewitness stated. 8 Even in workers' quarters, the performances of the film are reported to have drawn full houses. 4 A sure sign of its success was the eagerness with which Ufa as well as other film companies repeated the formula. In the years to come, numerous similar films were launched, the last ones under Hitler. Whether they featured Frederick as the rebellious youth, the charming host of Sans Souci or the "Old Fritz," they all more or less adopted the pattern of the first Fridericus film. And in all but one of them Otto Gebuhr portrayed the king. Perhaps it is more correct to say that he resurrected him. Whenever he played the flute, fastened his great sparkling eyes on some ambassador, rode on a white horse at the head of his troops, or, a stooped figure in a 1 Program to the film's first two parts; Ufa Verkih-Proffrommt, 1923, pp. 26-29 (also including synopsis of Parts 3 and 4) ; Tannenbaum, "Der Grossfthn," J>er Film von Morgen, p. 67. Kalbus, Devttche Fiknkuntt, I, 55; Vincent, Hittoire de VArt Cintmato- graphiqu*, p. 142; Bardfeche and Brasillach, History of Motion Pictures, p, 189. 3 Birnbaum, "Massenscenen im Film," Ufa-BUitter. Kalbus, Deutsche Filmkunst, I, 55. FROM REBELLION TO SUBMISSION 117 dirty uniform, moved about with his crutch among his generals, it was as if Frederick himself passed across the screen at least, it was so until 1930, when the actor's sonorous stage voice began to conflict with his appearance. Towards the end of the twenties, Werner Hegemann published a book on Frederick the Great violently attacked by all nationalists for debunking the current Frederick legend. 5 But even though many intellectuals on the left took sides with Hegemann, the 'true" Frederick he painstakingly excavated never succeeded in upsetting the legendary one. Any legend immune to rational arguments can be supposed to rest upon powerful collective desires. The spurious Frederick obviously conformed to psychological dispositions wide- spread among the people. This accounts for the symptomatic value of the Fridericus films to be more precise, of the elaborate pattern of inner existence implied by them. Throughout the Fridericus series the psychological course lead- ing from the rebellion of the crown prince to his final submission is strongly emphasized. It was a theme, or rather a complex of themes, long familiar to the Germans. Kleist's Prinz Friedrich von Horn- burg had dealt with the conflict between the individual's moral right to unauthorized initiative and his moral duty to submit to the authority of the state. Then, following the example of Wedekind's Frtihlings ErwacJien (The Awakening of Spring, 1891), several early expressionist dramas had advocated the rebellion of the son against the father, and at about the same time a whole generation of young Germans had set out to practice this rebellion in the form of the idealistic Youth Movement. 6 In stressing the development from rebellion to submission, the Fridericus films adapted themselves to current circumstances. Owing to the postwar revolutionary situa- tion, the masses were not ready to believe unhesitatingly in the necessity for authoritarian behavior. All Fridericus films therefore resorted to a detour. They began by sanctioning rebellious, if not revolutionary, conduct so as to captivate the minds in turmoil; but they did so only to pass off this conduct as the first stage of an evolution in the course of which it would have to be suppressed. The son's rebellion, which in the expressionist dramas prepared the 5 Cf. English translation: Hegemann, Frederick the Great, London, 1929. 6 For the father-son conflict in early expressionism, see Hain, Studtin, pp. 88-86. For the German Youth Movement, see Weniger, "Die Jugendbewegung," Geist der Geffenwart, pp. 1-54. See also Enkson, "Hitler's Imagery . . ," Psychiatry, Nov. 1942, p. 4.78 ff. 118 THE POSTWAR PERIOD ground for the "new man," was here to increase the father's sov- ereignty. These films presented the rebel as the pupa of the dic- tator, and approved of anarchy inasmuch as it made authority desirable. They offered a way out of the dilemma between chaos and tyranny by transforming the dilemma itself into an evolutionary process a process including rebellion as a legitimate phase. This legalization undoubtedly served to repress the old trauma of the unsuccessful bourgeois revolution, which now more than ever before was bound to haunt the collective mind. The reality of a rebellion in- corporated into the system of social life could not but overshadow that trauma. What the screen postulated came true in life. In the postwar period, the Youth Movement developed from a spontaneous uprising into an officially confirmed institution, which rapidly dis- integrated, parts of it being absorbed by the existent political and religious groups. As if to demonstrate their instinctive desire to do away with the traumatic image of the revolution, many genuine followers of the Movement were to join the marching Nazi columns. The moral of the Fridericus films was to submit unconditionally to absolute authority. Here a contradiction arises. On the one hand, a majority of Germans in particular middle-class Germans tried to fend off socialist notions by insisting upon the idealistic concept of the autonomous individual. On the other hand, the same people were keen on giving up individual autonomy in favor of total depend- ence upon an autocratic ruler, provided, of course, that he prevent any encroachments on private property. Provoked by interest in safeguarding vital privileges, this paradox seemed unavoidable. There remained only one way to preserve a semblance of self- determination while actually relinquishing it : one could participate in the ruler's glory and thus drown the consciousness of one's submis- sion to him. The halo of glamour surrounding the screen Frederick lured the audience into acts of identification with this supergenius. Since all those who, consciously or not, adopted the pattern of the Fridericus films did so in a period in which they were offered a unique chance of freedom, their renunciation of individual autonomy was tantamount to a grave retrogression no doubt the gravest since the unification of Germany. Even though it was by no means a foregone conclusion that the price of a mature acceptance of de- mocracy would be the loss of their social status, they preferred to fall back on a state of immaturity. The Fridericus films not only played up the old king's solitude in a juvenile manner recalling FROM REBELLION TO SUBMISSION 119 the mountain films' exaltation of some lonely mountaineer on a lofty peak but also testified to the inferiority complex bound up with retrogressive behavior. Feelings of inferiority expressed them- selves through the aggrandizement of Frederick's power politics as well as through the depreciation of Voltaire's significance. Episodes showing Voltaire in Frederick's company were inserted in FREDERICUS REX and several other films of the series. Besides distorting the facts, these episodes stressed his depravity rather than his superiority; the Voltaire they set up seemed designed to intimate the decay of French civilization and to justify the resent- ment of an authoritarian-minded public against enlightening reason. The other standard film suggesting authoritarian behavior was Ufa's DIE STRASSE (THE STREET, 1923). That it was a nonpolitical avant-garde product indicates that the moral implications of FREDERICUS REX did not appeal merely to those who applauded its political propositions. THE STREET sprang from the same deep psy- chological layers as the films by Carl Mayer or the genuine expres- sionist films. Karl Grune, a former Reinhardt disciple, who was its script writer and director in one, has himself told how he happened to discover the cinema. The vicissitudes of the war had forced him to live for long years among foreign soldiers ; but, instead of learning their language, he had simply watched their gestures and faces so as to become familiar with their intentions. His experiences aroused his desire to develop on the screen a pictorial language as communicative as the spoken one. 7 This may help explain why THE STREET, made completely without titles, was particularly rich in significant pictures. It ingratiated itself with a rather broad public composed mainly of intellectuals. Exactly like the first half of FRIDERICTTS REX, Grune's simple story illustrates development from rebellion to submission. It starts in a dim plush parlor sheltering a middle-class, middle-aged philis- tine, who desperately longs for the sensations and splendors of the nocturnal city. His wife enters with the soup tureen, and as if this ritual action has impressed upon him the infinite monotony of his existence, he suddenly runs away. The street engulfs the would-be rebel. A prostitute lures him into a night-club, done in inflation style, and there introduces him to two "friends" : her souteneur and his chum. While they start gulling him, a provincial bourgeois naively 7 Vincent, Histoire de I' Art CinSmatographique, p. 150. 120 THE POSTWAR PERIOD exhibiting his wallet swollen with banknotes joins the party. Both he and the rebellious philistine are predestined to be plucked. The subsequent episodes among them a game of cards with beautifully lit close-ups of the assembled faces result in a terrible showdown : the two criminals kill the provincial and, using the prostitute as bait, contrive to make the man from the plush parlor appear the mur- derer. At the police station, the man proves so helpless that he does not even think of asserting his innocence ; he simply succumbs to his despair and, left alone in a cell, tries to end his life. Owing to the real murderer's confession, this second attempt to run away is frus- trated. Released, the man staggers along the street, which at dawn is a vacuum, except for scraps of waste paper occasionally stirred by the wind. When he reappears in the parlor, his wife silently puts the warmed-up soup on the table. And the man now willingly sub- mits to the domestic regime, including all soups to come. The street calls him no longer. It is as if he considered the ordeal he has undergone a well-deserved punishment for his vain rebellion. 8 The staging is of interest in that it manifests two different inten- tions of style. 9 In the conception of the philistine, for instance, ex- pressionist mentality still predominates. Eugen Klopf er moves about in this part like a somnambulist, and whenever he expresses joy, bewilderment or horror, his gestures seem to be determined by hal- lucinations rather than by actual experiences. These gestures would undoubtedly appear less exaggerated if, as in the case of CAUGABI, the whole film were nothing but an outward projection of inner events. However, realistic designs interfere with the expressionist ones. Far from being a sheer fantasy or a- forthright psychological construction, the plot is an episode of everyday life handled in an almost realistic spirit. This spirit also animates the settings they awkwardly endeavor to give the impression of normal surroundings and moreover transforms the characters, except for the philistine, into individuals who, notwithstanding their lack of names, might well exist outside the picture frame. Here a realism breaks through which has nothing in common with the cheap realism of conventional productions; it is a militant realism challenging the penchant for introspection. The rise of this realistic tendency in THE STREET clearly indicates that the general retreat into a shell, symptomatic 8 Program brochure to the film; "The Street," National Board of Review Maga- zine, June 1927, p. 9. 9 Kurtz, Eocpressionwnwfi, p. 128; Jahier, "42 Ans de Cinema," Le Rdle in- tellectuel du Cinema, pp. 62-63. FROM REBELLION TO SUBMISSION 121 of the postwar period, was about to be revoked. It was as if with the acceptance of the formula "From rebellion to submission" that retreat had attained its aim, and as if now that the process of inner adjustment had come to a close the collective soul desired to resume contact with outer reality. Various pictorial devices help to characterize the street into which the rebellious philistine ventures as a jungle swept by un- accountable instincts. At the beginning, when the man still lingers in his plush parlor, the ceiling becomes luminous with lights reflect- ing those of the street outside the window; they herald the street, and he nostalgically watches their display above him. In this famous scene light assumes exactly the same function as in Carl Mayer's instinct films : its iridescent fluctuations symbolize the irrational al- ternations in the sphere of instinctive life. The excited man goes to the window and, looking out, sees not the street itself, but a hallucinated street. Shots of rushing cars, fireworks and crowds form, along with shots taken from a speeding roller coaster, a con- fusing whole, made still more confusing by the use of multiple exposures and the insertion of transparent close-ups of a circus clown, a woman and an organ-grinder. 10 Through this ingeniously cut montage sequence the street is defined as a sort of fair, that is, as the region of chaos. The circle usually serving as a symbol of chaos has yielded to the straight line of a city street; since chaos here is not so much an end in itself as a passage ending in the realm of authority, this change of symbols is well-founded. On the street itself, all kinds of objects take on life, awakened, as in Carl Mayer's films, by the presence of instinct-possessed beings. A wavy line on the pavement it carries the same meaning as the oscillating light on the ceiling tempts the man to follow its course, and the two intermittently glowing eyes of an optician's shop almost frighten him into retreat, as if they were the eyes of an invisible bogey [Dlus. 21], For the first time on the German screen window- dressings participate in the action. The man gazes through an art- shop window at nudities that make him dream of ideal beauty, and then, transported by his dreams, sails to faraway countries aboard the ship model in a nearby travel agency. Instead of acknowledging the values of anarchical life, the film deprecates this life by marking the street as a region where the law of the jungle rules and happiness is sought in gambling and in futile 10 Cf. Wessc, Grottmacht ^iZm, pp. 229-32. 122 THE POSTWAR PERIOD sex affairs. This verdict on anarchy goes hand in hand with the glorification of the police. One scene, destined to reappear in many a film to come, is very significant. While ever-new waves of vehicles hurl onwards, a little child, lost in the crowd, sets out to cross the street. With an imperious gesture a policeman stops the waves and, like Moses leading the Jews across the Red Sea, pilots the child safely through the petrified traffic. Then hell breaks loose anew, submerging the miraculous lane. Again it is the police who reveal the terrified philistine's innocence and send him back home. What a change of concepts since CALIGARI! Whereas CALIGARI scoffs at the police to stigmatize official authority, here just and wise author- ity realizes itself through police overpowering the sinister forces of anarchy. In exposing the psychological mechanisms involved in the would- be rebel's submission, THE STEEET corroborates the Fridericus films to the full. Particularly conclusive is the final scene showing the man back in his parlor. At this crucial moment, when the slightest reac- tion is telling, the man anticipates the gesture of the caf -owner in NEW YEAR'S EVE: he rests his head upon his wife's shoulder, and she, in turn, caresses his arm as maternally as if he were her child ll [Illus. 22], The shot does not conceal that he experiences his frus- tration with voluptuous masochism and a feeling of inferiority in- creased by that of guilt. To these rather familiar traits a new one is added: retrogression assumes the character of resignation. When, before re-entering his room, the man hesitatingly walks upstairs, scattered lights from the street play all over him, seem to say fare- well. The mood of resignation is so conspicuous that it induced an American reviewer to formulate the film's moral as follows : "Better stay where you are. Life in the haunts you are unused to, is dan- gerous. Romance may always be around the corner, but the effort to find it is hardly worth the candle you must burn to light the way," 12 This mood is about the opposite of the banal optimism per- vading THE OTHER, of 1913. In that old film, the lawyer, Dr. Hal- lers, returns from his subconscious escapade involving him in criminal actions with the pleasant sensation of regaining his normal middle- class status; ten years later, in THE STREET S the return from a similar escapade amounts to a sad renunciation of life. The contrast between the two kindred films strikingly reveals the rapid decline of I'Cf. p. w. " "The Street/' National Board of Review Magazine, June 1927, p, 9. FROM REBELLION TO SUBMISSION 123 the middle class and its determination to deny this decline at any cost. Under the given circumstances, the philistine cannot help look- ing out for a shining new Fridericus to chase away the sadness from his plush parlor. The philistine may easily turn into a sort of split personality. Just before the war, THE STUDENT OF PRAGUE had mirrored the duality of any liberal under the Kaiser; now THE STREET fore- shadowed a duality provoked by the retrogressive move from rebel- lion to submission. Besides resulting in feelings of inferiority and the like, this particular shift of balance upset the whole inner system and, in consequence, favored mental dissociation. The surprising fre- quency of dual roles in German films among them Murnau's JANUS-FACED (1920) mentioned above, Lubitsch's KOHLHIESL'S TOCHTER (KOHLHIESL'S DAUGHTERS, 1920) featuring Henny Porten as both the fine lady and her blunt maid, Grune's DIE BRUDER SCHELLENBERG (Two BROTHERS, 1926) and the world- famous DER KONGRESS TANZT (CONGRESS DANCES, 1931) would suggest that cases of duality occurred then in real life on a rather large scale. 18 And in fact, throughout the whole republican era no unbiased observer was able to overlook a phenomenon bearing out the screen's ample evidence: the widespread discrepancy between theory and practice, thinking and living. Instead of being aware of two Faustian souls in his breast, as in the past, the individual was dragged in contradictory directions and did not know it. This dis- sociation seemed to him only a new facet of the old inner abundance. It is probable a hint of that kind has already been made that the middle-class German's reluctance to emancipate himself originated in the fear of losing not only his social privileges, but also those multifaceted potentialities he thought he had discovered within himself. 14 Derivative of the street theme are a number of aesthetically valuable films which, notwithstanding substantial differences, have one motif in common: in all of them the leading character breaks away from the social conventions to grasp life, but the conventions prove stronger than the rebel and force him into either submission or suicide. However inconspicuous a role this motif may play in the films under consideration, its frequency corroborates what can be 13 For JANUS-FACED, see p. 78 ; for CONGRESS DANCES, p. 208. Cf, Kalbus, Dents che Filmkunst, I, 115. 4 Cf. p. 60. 124 THE POSTWAR PERIOD inferred from the figures of Frederick and the philistine : that pow- erful collective dispositions urged the resumption of authoritarian behavior. 15 As early as 1920, the motif began its screen career in VON MORGEKS BIS MlTTERNACHT (FROM MORN TO MlDNIGHT), an 6X- pressionist experiment fashioned after Georg Kaiser's play of that title and reportedly shown in no country other than Japan. In it, the philistine of THE STREET is anticipated in the character of a teller, who in his desire to exchange everyday life for something great and beautiful wastes the money of his bank on prostitutes and in night-clubs, and at the end, disappointed, kills himself to escape the police. 16 Murnau, too, was infatuated with the motif. In his PHAN- TOM (1922) a screen version of a novel by Gerhart Hauptmann a humble town clerk longs to become a famous poet and marry a charming girl he has seen driving past him in a pony-drawn phaeton. Possessed by his longing, he sleeps with a prostitute re- sembling the unattainable girl and sinks ever deeper, until in the solitude of his prison cell he learns to renounce all phantoms. Mur- nau's film reached its pictorial climax with a montage sequence that fused street impressions into a vision of chaos. 17 15 These dispositions asserted themselves in places and on occasions where no one would have suspected them. In 1919, Max Weber, who after the armistice had joined the staff of Frankfurter Zeitwng to help prepare a German democracy, went to Versailles and then paid a visit to General Ludendorff, trying to persuade him that he must deliver himself up to the Allies. Ludendorff refused. Their subsequent dialogue, quoted from Meyer Schapiro's article **A Note on Max Weber's Politics" (Politics, Feb. 1945, p. 44), confirms the testimony of all these authoritarian-minded films. Ludendorff: "There's your fine democracy I You and the Frankfurter Zeitung are responsible for it! What good has come of it?** Weber: "Do you believe then that I consider the mess we are in now democracy?" L.: "If that's how you talk; perhaps we can come to an understanding.'* W.: "But the mess before was also no monarchy." L.: "What do you understand then by democracy?" W.: "In a democracy the people elects the leader (F&hrtr) whom it trusts. Then the elected one says: 'Now shut up and obey. People and parties must no longer butt in.' " L.: "Such 'democracy' is all right with me." W.i "Afterwards the people can judge if the leader has made mistakes, to the gallows with him!" Max Weber was quite able to foresee that first the people would be sent to the gallows by their leader. But his intrinsic urges apparently interfered with his sociological judgment -See also Kurtz, Expressionismus, p. 12. * Kurtz, &<&, pp. 15-17, 69-70; Zaddach, Der literarifcfo Film, p. 89; Bersti, ed., 85 Jahre Berliner Theater, p. 94. The motif under consideration also asserted itself in Berthold Viertel's fantastic film DIE PaimtcxjE (THE WIG, 1928?). 17 Program brochure to the film; Jahrbuoh der Filvnindustrie, 1922/8, p. 41; Decla- Bioicop Verleih-Programme, p. 18; Wesse, Grottmacht Film, pp. 182-85; Balazs, Der sichtbare Mensch, p. 85. FROM REBELLION TO SUBMISSION 125 In 1923, Lubitsch took over. He promoted the motif in DEE FLAMME ( MONTH AKTRE), which, laid in last-century Paris, nar- rated the love affair between a naive young composer and a cocotte with a pure soul. The composer leaves his austere mother for the cocotte, but since he fails to leave his bourgeois inhibitions behind, his new life turns into a troublesome adventure from which he peni- tently flees back to his loving mother. The original version ends with the cocotte throwing herself out of the window with the words : "The street calls me." One genuine "Lubitsch touch" was the scene in which the cocotte prepared her brothel room for the composer's first visit by shifting the furniture so that the room suddenly looked as respectable as he then believed her to be. 18 The motif reappeared in NJU (HUSBANDS OR LOVERS? 1924), a psychological study based upon a play by Ossip Dimov. It was Paul Czinner's first film with Elisabeth Bergner, who played in it a married woman hungry for love. The action begins with a stranger (Conrad Vcidt) gazing up from the street to her window. Enticed by him, she parts with husband and child, and moves into a fur- nished room, which seems to her a paradise compared to her home ; but after a while the stranger tires of the paradise and his mistress, and bluntly advises her to return to her husband. In her desolation, she prefers to drown herself. Finally, the stranger is seen standing in her furnished room, while an old charwoman cleans it for the subsequent lodger. The whole film breathed a sadness surpassing that of THE STREET. It was as if hope had deserted the world of the middle-class home as well as the middle-class rebel's enchanted street world : at home, Emil Jannings as the vulgar husband walked about with his suspenders hanging down, and the street merely led from a furnished room to the river. 19 The motif materialized yet again in VARI^T^ (VARIETY), re- leased toward the end of 1925 that year which marked the rise of a realistic-minded era. Even though this world-renowned music-hall film indulged in the new realism, it still radiated the spirit of bygone days. VARIETY was a belated product of the postwar period, an end rather than a beginning. The film, made after a popular prewar novel by Felix Hollander, 18 Ufa Verleih-Programme, 1928/4, pp. 48-51; Kalbus, Deutsche Filmkunst> I, 60; Bal&zs, Der sichtbare Mensch, p. 104; "Montmartre," Exceptional Photoplays, Feb^March 1924, p. 5; Berstl, ed., $5 Jahre Berliner Theater, p. 98. 19 Publicity sheet to the film; Film Society Programme, Feb. 14, 1926; Weinberg, Scrapbooka, 1927; Rotha, Film Till Now, p. 195; Leprobon, **Le Cinema AUemand," Le Rouge et le Noir, July 1928, p. 142. 126 THE POSTWAR PERIOD opens with a sequence inside a penitentiary. Emil Jannings as "Boss" Huller has been pardoned before the end of his prison term, and now agrees to tell the prison director the story of his crime. This prefacing sequence is significant in that it emphasizes Huller's ulti- mate submission. At the outset of the story proper, Huller is run- ning a shabby show in an amusement park, but neither that nor his faded wife can compensate for the sensations he had once experi- enced as a trapeze artist. One day, a sailor brings Huller a girl from a remote southern country. Huller hires her, and soon her sensuous beauty stirs him to rebel against his humdrum existence. He runs away with her. While they are working on the trapeze in a Berlin fair, Artinelli, a music-hall artist of international reputation, ap- proaches the couple to engage them for the Berlin Wintergarten. They act as his partners when he performs a triple somersault blindfolded. Fatally, Artinelli and the girl extend their partnership into leisure time between the performances. No sooner does Huller learn of the girl's betrayal, than he turns into one of those instinct- possessed characters who destroy each other so eagerly in the films of Carl Mayer. A reincarnation of the trackwalker in SHATTERED, 20 he kills Artinelli and surrenders to the police. Here the flashback ends. In the final scene, the prison gates open symbolically before Huller; but nothing indicates that, in stepping out of them, he will be freed from the prison of his self. 21 The plot confines itself to inter- weaving the motif of rebellion and submission with the familiar theme of the instinct dramas in a rather banal manner. Nevertheless, VARIETY aroused a "white heat of enthusiasm" among American moviegoers. 22 The film, as Harry Alan Potamkin puts it, "burnt its way through these United States and came near demoralizing the matter-of-fact technique of Hollywood." 23 Ac- customed to that matter-of-fact technique, the American public may have been struck by the intensity everyday life assumed in VARIETY. Such accustomed settings as a music hall, a caf6 and a stuffy hotel corridor seemed to glow from within. It was as if one had never before seen these commonplace surroundings. E. A. Dupont had staged VARIETY under Erich Pommer's in- ao Cf. p. 98. 31 Weinberg, Scrapbooks, 1925-27 , Moussinac, Panoramique du Cinema, pp. 49-50. aa Quoted from Jacobs, American Film, p. 807. Potamkin, "The Rise and Fall of the German Film," Cinema, April 1980, p. 24. For the influence of the German school in this country, see Jacobs, American Film, pp. 831-82, and "Die entfesselte Kamera," Ufa-Maffc&in, March 25-31, 1927. FROM REBELLION TO SUBMISSION 127 spiring supervision. 24 Dupont was not an innovator, but he was a brilliant adaptor. Assisted by Karl Freund, the cameraman of THE LAST LAUGH, he adapted the methods of the expressionist postwar period to the exigencies of the realistic Dawes Plan period. (Traces of expressionism can still be found in the framing prison scenes of VARIETY.) Dupont's achievement lay in that, in shaping his music- hall film, he penetrated outer reality by means of devices used origi- nally in the outward projection of inner reality. This transplanting of techniques had, of course, amazing results. It has been rightly ob- served that in VARIETY the actors seem to be unaware of the pres- ence of the camera; Jannings' bulky back, for instance, plays as conspicuous a part as any close-up of his face 25 [Illus. 23] . Such truth to reality could hardly be achieved without the incessant camera movements typical of this film; for they alone enable the spectator to break into the magic circle of the action. Led by the inquisitive camera, he rushes through space as if he were one of the trapeze artists, sneaks about rooms full of tension, identifies him- self with Artinelli when he lies in wait for the girl, and spies on her hasty endeavor to renew her make-up before rejoining Jannings [Ulus. 24]. Unusual camera angles, multiple exposures and saga- cious transitions help transport the spectator to the heart of the events. 26 Thus Dupont superseded the conventional realism of the past by a realism that captured along with visible phenomena the psychological processes below their surface. However, nothing he offered was essentially new. Psychological ubiquity as well as fluidity of pictorial narration : all sprang from THE LAST LAUGH. 27 VARIETY was a derivative of this fundamental film ; it resumed in the realistic sphere what THE LAST LAUGH had accomplished in the sphere of introspection. Numerous less important films of the postwar period have al- 24 For Dupont and his first film, DAS ALTE GESETZ (THE ANCIENT LAW, 1928), see Vincent, Bistolre de I' Art Cintmatoffraphique, p. 157; Museum of Modern Art Library, clipping files. 2S Moussinac, Panoramiqut du Cin&ma, pp. 51-52; Arnheim, Film als Kunst, pp. 58-59; Vincent, Histoire fa VArt Cindmatographique, pp. 157-58,- Leprohon, "Le Cin&na Allemand," Le Rouge et le Noir, July 1928, pp. 188, 141. 96 Karl Freund himself comments on the camera angles: "In Variety, the unac- customed angle was stressed by necessity, owing to cramped quarters in the Berlin Winter Palace, where the picture was made, and this film, curiously enough, was an original source-book of the lying-on-the-stomach school of photography, which has today reached the proportions of a national craze." Quoted from B. C. Crisler, 'The Friendly Mr. Freund," New York Times, Nov. 21, 198T. a7 Cf. p. 105 f. 128 THE POSTWAB PERIOD ready been mentioned. It remains to complete their survey. The need for adaptations was so urgent that even Hermann Bang's esoteric novel Michael was made into a film perhaps because of its tinge of homosexuality (MICHAEL, 1924). 28 Rather frequent were such films as DIE LEEBESBREEPE DER BAUONIN S. (THE LOVE LETTERS OF BARONESS S., 1924) and KOMODIE DES HERZENS (COMEDY OF THE HEART, 1924s), which offered a convenient mixture of love life and society life. Harry Piel thrillers, detective films with Ernst Reicher as Stuart Webbs, Ossi Oswalda comedies and Henny Porten dramas were institutions. 29 Outshining all these stars, Asta Nielsen played characters ennobled by love, with an intensity that made one ignore the affinity of her films with bad magazine stories. In the concluding scenes of ABSTXTRZ (DOWNFALL, 1923), she was a worn- out old woman trying desperately to look young again for her lover who was returning from a ten-year prison term ; no one who watched her vain attempt will ever forget her acting. 80 At the end of the inflation period, there was a new vogue of historical pageants and a sudden mania for films centering round folk-songs just the right thing for small-town people and salesgirls with warm hearts and nothing else. 81 In a tiny realm of her own, Lotte Reiniger swung her scissors diligently, preparing one sweet silhouette film after another. 82 38 Willy Haas, Skvszen zv, MichaeV* Welt, a publicity booklet for the film. In this context, Berthold Viertel's film, NORA (Winter, 1923/4), with Olga Tsche- chows in her first film role, may be mentioned. Cf. Kalbus, Deutsche Filmkwnst, I, 72; Arnheim, Film als Kunst, p. 109; Zaddach, Der Uterarische Film, p. 50. 29 For Harry Piel and Ernst Reicher films, see "Die Produktion des Jahres," Das grose BUderbuch des Films, 1925, pp. 168-70. For Henny Porlen films of the time, see Porten, "Mein Leben," Ufa-Magazin, April 22-28, 1927. Jannings was featured in ALLES FUB. GfeLD (ALL FOE MONEY, 1928); cf. Ufa Verleih-Proyramme, 1923/4, pp. 52-55. 80 Cf. Balazs, Der siohtbare Mensch, pp. 168, 165-67. For the Nielsen film DAS FETCH (THE FIBE, 1924), see Moreck, Sittengeschiohte, pp. 165-68. 01 Among the historical pageants of the time were HELENA (1924), CAHLOH UND ELISABETH (CABLOS AND ELISABETH, 1924), and DEE SxLAVEirKoxrxQnr (Mooar OF ISRAEL, 1924). Synopsis of the latter film in ZUustrierter Film-Kurier. For the foregoing films, cf. Zaddach, Der Uteransche Film, pp. 55-56, and Kalbus, Deutsche Filmkwitt, I, 67. Kalbus, ibid,, p. 59, lists a number of films featuring folk-song themes as a peculi- arity of the year 1924. 3a Reiniger, "JLebende Schatten," Fitm-Photos, pp. 45-46; Film Society Pro- gramme, Dec. 11, 1927; etc. THE STABILIZED PERIOD (1924-1929) 11 DECLINE IN 1924, after the mark had been stabilized, Germany accepted the Dawes Plan, which arranged for the payment of reparations and effected Germany's incorporation into the financial system of the Allies. Normal life began to reassert itself, and soon the inflation seemed a remote nightmare. This stabilized or Dawes Plan period lasted until 1929, when the crash put an end to false prosperity. While it lasted, Stresemann embarked upon a clever policy of re- habilitation, marked by such successes as the Treaty of Locarno and Germany's entrance into the League of Nations. At home, things did not look too bad either. Even though the Hitlerites and their like tried hard to undermine the "system," as they called the Weimar regime, no one would listen to them. The oblivion into which they sank resulted not so much from any inner strength of the Republic as from an abundance of foreign loans that helped reduce unemploy- ment by engendering feverish activity. With the aid of these loans, which were granted to public cor- porations, communities and businessmen alike, the German indus- trialists modernized and expanded their plants systematically. To- wards the end of the stabilized period, Germany commanded an in- dustrial apparatus with a capacity far beyond her immediate needs. Its creation was bound up with an enormous increase of adminis- trative functions. From 1924 to 1928, the number of the employees was augmented fivefold, while that of the workers was scarcely doubled. The white-collar class developed into an important social stratum. Simultaneously, another change took place which contem- poraries spoke of as the streamlining of big business (RationaLi- sierung der Wirtschaft) : the methods of the assembly line were transferred to the workrooms of the administration buildings. This meant that with regard to their occupational and economic plight innumerable employees were no better off than the workers. Yet instead of acknowledging their proletarian existence, they endeav- 181 132 THE STABILIZED PERIOD ored to maintain their old middle-class status. Compared to the workers with their firm beliefs and hopes, these three and a half million employees were mentally shelterless; all the more so as the middle class itself had begun to falter. They filled the cities and belonged nowhere. 1 Considering their crucial position within the social structure, much depended upon their reactions. The films would have to take notice of them. From 1924 on, economic exigencies influenced the development of the German film more directly than in the previous years. To understand this a few retrospective remarks are indispensable. Dur- ing the inflation, the film industry managed to get along without serious disturbances. It is true that the domestic market yielded only 10 per cent of the production costs. However, two circumstances compensated for this ruinous situation. First, people eagerly spent their money, which was lost anyway, on every pleasure available; in consequence, movie theaters were crowded and even increased in number. Secondly, the export of films, much furthered by "dump- ing," proved exceedingly lucrative. A Swiss license, which in nor- mal times would have amounted to nothing, represented a value almost equivalent to the cost of an average film. Tempted by such opportunities, numerous unpleasant profiteers squeezed into the film business, and minor banks readily supported brand-new joint-stock companies, whose supervisory boards usually included some Excel- lency highly paid for the attractiveness of his title. Fritz Olimsky states in his thesis on German film economics that at that time the cultural standards in the film industry were lower than in all other industries of similar size. 2 This testifies to the relative independence of art from its environment; for amidst the weeds there blossomed such films as THE STREET and NEW YEAR'S EVE. No sooner was the mark stabilized than the film industry suf- fered a severe setback, caused by the sudden discontinuance of all exports. It was the so-called stabilization crisis. In 1924 and 1925, many new joint-stock companies went bankrupt, and the Excellen- cies retired, leaving behind ruined stockholders. The distributors felt the blow more than anyone. With box-office receipts dwindling *Cf. Rosenberg, Geschichte der Deutachen Republik, p. 181 if.; Schwarzschild, World in Trance, pp. 227, 248, 247, 261-62; Samuel and Thomas, Expressionism in German Life, p. 171; Kracauer, Die Angestellten. * Olimsky, Filnuoirtschaft, p. 28; see also pp. 26-27, 29. Jason, "Zahlen sehen uns an . ," $6 Jahre Kiiwmato graph, p. 68. DECLINE 133 and the banks demanding exorbitant rates of interest, the surviving film companies hardly knew where to turn. 3 But man's extremity is God's opportunity. God in this case was Hollywood. The big Hollywood industrialists recognized that after the re- establishment of the gold standard in Germany the German market would offer them pleasant possibilities. They were determined to step in, and began flooding Germany with American pictures. In the course of this large-scale invasion, they not only founded their own distributing agencies there, but also purchased big German movie theaters and even built several new ones. To stem the flood, the German government decreed that for every foreign film released a German film should be produced. But this decree had quite an un- expected effect: it gave rise to the widespread species of "quota films" (Contingent filme). Many a quota film was never released, its sole reason for existence being the acquisition of a "quota certificate" (Kontingentscheiri) that would authorize its holder to import a for- eign picture. In the caf 6s where the film agents met, these certificates were traded like stocks. Of course, the Americans had a vital interest in getting as many certificates as possible; they therefore produced their own quota films in Germany, and in addition financed or bought up a number of German film companies. No doubt, these methods of infiltration were unscrupulous, but they did enable the native film industry to surmount a perilous crisis. 4 The case of Ufa illustrates the whole situation. In 1925, Ufa was in such a lamentable predicament that it would have failed with- out the intervention of Paramount and Loew's Inc. (Metro-Gold- wyn) . The two Hollywood companies urged Ufa to sign the so-called "Parufamet agreement," which provided that in return for a con- siderable loan Ufa should put its quota certificates as well as its numerous movie theaters at the disposal of the American creditors. These terms proved the more disastrous as, with the millions it acquired, Ufa had not only to fulfill its new obligations but also to liquidate its old debt to the Deutsche Bank. In 1927, as a result of both external pressure and internal mismanagement, Ufa was again on the verge of ruin. Then Hugenberg came to its rescue Hugenberg, the Prussian conservative and reactionary, who through 3 Olimsky, Fttmwirtschaft, p. 80. 4 Olimsky, ibid., pp. 43-45, 54-55; Jason, "Zahlen sehen uns an . . ," 25 Jdhre Kinematoffraph, pp. 68-69; Neumann, Film-'Kunstf p. 60; Fawcett, Dfo Welt det Films, p. 121; Berr, "Etat du Cin&na 1981: Etats-Unis et Allemagne," Revue du Cinema, July 1981, p. 50. 134 THE STABILIZED PEBIOD the newspapers in his possession controlled a vast domain of public opinion. He wanted to extend his influence by swallowing the leading German film company. After the ensuing revision of the Parufamet agreement, Ufa was free to become a propaganda instrument in Hugenberg's hands. Yet as long as the Republic seemed firmly established, Hugenberg neither utilized this instrument to the full nor even expected all Ufa executives to share his views. 5 He was also a businessman, after all. This does not mean that the Hugenberg Ufa took a liking to the democratic ways of life. It merely chose to obstruct them under the mask of neutrality. Occasionally, the mask covering reactionary behind-the-scenes activities was lifted. In 192T, when Phoebus went bankrupt, the public learned that this important film company had been financed, and ruled, by a certain Captain Lohmann. And the republican and leftist press revealed that his money had come from the secret funds of the Reichswehr. The Phoebus affair turned into a Reichs- wehr scandal, and for a moment the smoldering conspiracy of the militarists seemed seriously compromised. It was not, of course. Hindenburg fired the democrat Gessler, until then in charge of the Reichswehr ministry, and appointed General Groener in his place. And there the matter ended. 6 With the commencement of the Dawes Plan period the character of the German film changed markedly. Now that life had resumed normal aspects and social revolution was no longer impending, the fantastic figures and unreal settings of the postwar screen dissolved into thin air like the vampire in NOSFERATTJ. To be sure, studio- minded products persisted long after 1924. 7 But on the whole the films of the stabilized period turned towards the outer world, shifting the emphasis from apparitions to actual appearances, from imagi- nary landscapes to natural surroundings. They were essentially realistic. A change in aesthetic standards took place also. Compared to the postwar films those of the stabilized period were aesthetically dubi- ous. "The true German film died quietly," Paul Rotha comments on S 01imsky, Filmwirtachaft, pp. 29-80; Fawcett, Die Welt des Films, pp. 122-20; Schwarzschild, World in Trance, p. 283; Schlesinger, "Das moderne deutsche Licht- spiel-theater," Das grosse Bilderbvch, 1925, p* 28. * Rosenberg, QeschicUe der Deutschm Republik, p. 212; see also New York Times, from Berlin, Aug. 9, 1927 (clipping in Weinberg, Scraf books, 1927). 7 Cf. Potauakin, "The Rise and Fall of the German Film," Cinema,, April 1980, p. 25. DECLINE 135 the output after VARIETY. 8 Observers were unanimous in remarking this decline. The problem is how to explain it. One explanation offered is the exodus of many prominent Ger- man film artists and technicians about the middle of the twenties. Hollywood bought them up, as it did other foreign talents. Among the first to answer the call were Lubitsch, Pola Negri, Hans Kraly and Buchowetski. In 1925 and 1926 they were joined by a whole crowd, including the star directors E. A. Dupont, Ludwig Berger, Lupu Pick, Paul Leni and Murnau, and such actors as Veidt and Jannings. Erich Pommer, too, could not resist the temptation. There is no doubt that Hollywood effected this wholesale importa- tion not solely to heighten its own standards ; the main idea was to eliminate a competitor extremely dangerous at the time. 9 But much as the mass desertions added to the difficulties of the German screen, they did not cause its decline. This can be evidenced by the fact that, after the mark was stabilized, several brilliant directors of the post- war period among them Murnau and Lang wasted their crafts- manship on insignificant products. Murnau then left Germany, but Lang stayed at home, and new talents also began to emerge. The decline was not due to the lack of talent; rather, many a talent declined for reasons still to be explored. Another explanation has been found in the tendency, then wide- spread, to "Americanize" the German film. This tendency flowed from the need to export. Since Hollywood seemed to have discovered the secret of pleasing all the world, the German producers dreamed of imitating what they believed to be the genuine Hollywood manner. The result was pitiful. And yet when G, W. Pabst, outstanding figure among the film directors of the stabilized period, was obliged to film his DEE LEBBE DER JEANNE NET (THE LOVE OF JEANNE NET) in the American style, he succeeded in making it a fascinating pic- ture. 10 The decline cannot be attributed to the penchant for films after the current Hollywood manner. Even though this penchant may well have accelerated the decline, it was nothing more than one of its symptoms. The attempt at Americanization went hand in hand with an effort 8 Rotha, Film Till Now, pp. 176, 181. 9 Rotha, ibid., pp. 80, 204; Jacobs, American Film, pp. 806-8; Vincent, Sistoire de VArt Cintmatoffraphique, p. 161; Olimsky, Filmwirtschaft, p. 43; Barry, Program Notes, Series III, program 2; Kalbus, Deutsche Filmkunst, II, 98. 10 MacPherson, "Die Liebe der Jeanne Ney," Clote Up, Dec. 192T, p. 18. See also Rotha, Film Till Now, p. 208. 1S6 THE STABILIZED PERIOD to internationalize the German film business. Franco-German and Anglo-German alliances prospered during that period. They de- voted themselves to joint productions, which as a rule indulged in a shallow cosmopolitanism. Most of them including such exceptions as Renoir's NANA and Feyder's THRESE RAQ.TTIN were shot in the German studios because of the superior technical resources there. Neubabelsberg, Staaken and Geiselgasteig became the favorite meet- ing-places of international teams. 11 Since the German film industry also admitted numerous foreigners among its personnel, several ob- servers have come to believe that the decline of the German screen was caused by a process of "denationalization." In his Histoire du Cwema, Robert Brasillach -the French collaborationist executed in February 1945 denounces a "host of rascals of dubious national- ity" as the ultimate source of all evils. A certain Rene Jeanne is even more precise ; he blames "the Jews and the aliens" for the prepon- derance of German films that lost all "German character." 12 The "German character" must have been exhausted, then, if it would simply yield to a handful of parasites. But the whole argument is unfounded, for in their concern with racial discrimination Brasil- lach and his like have overlooked a few weighty facts. Without the Austrian Jew Carl Mayer the German film would never have come into its own. The Viennese Fritz Lang, no pure Aryan either, made films so truly German that even Hitler admired them, and he was a connoisseur. It has also been seen that during the inflation, when a "host of rascals" meddled in all film matters, the German screen was far from declining artistically. Nor can the decline after 1924 be traced to those legal provisions which called forth the multitude of cheap "quota films." These films had characteristics in common with many an expensive superpro- duction. And on the other hand, Ruttmann's BERLIN, one of the most remarkable achievements of the period, was made as a quota film for Fox Europe. As Harry A. Potamkin puts it, "the real cause of the decline is an interior one." lft Modes of inner existence brought about the grandeur of the German screen throughout the postwar era; they also were responsible for its misery in subsequent years. As impor- "Rotha, ibid., p. 182; Fawcett, Die Welt des Films, pp. 128-29; Vincent, ffis- toire de ?Art Cintmatoffraphique, p. 162. "Bardeche and Brasillach, History of Motion Pictures, pp. 258-69; Jeanne, "Le Cinema Allemand," L'Art Cine'matoffraphique, VIII, 46. 13 Potamkin, "The Rise and Fall of the German Film," Cinema, April 1980, p. 26. DECLINE 137 tant postwar films testify, the outcome of the desperate struggle for psychological adjustment was a general strengthening of the old authoritarian tendencies. The masses, that is, were basically authoritarian-minded when they entered the stabilized period. But the republican regime of the period rested upon democratic prin- ciples that repudiated those mass tendencies. Prevented from finding an outlet and yet too persistent to yield, authoritarian dispositions fell into a state of paralysis. This naturally affected the whole of the collective mind. Instead of breathing life into the republican institutions, the masses drained themselves of life. They preferred the neutralization of their primary impulses to the transformation of these impulses. The decline of the German screen is nothing but the reflection of a widespread inner paralysis. 12 FROZEN GROUND THE films of the stabilized period can be divided into three groups. The first simply testifies to the existence of a state of paralysis. The second group sheds light on the tendencies and notions that are paralyzed. The third reveals the inner workings of the paralyzed collective soul. The innumerable films of the first group form the main bulk of the whole output. Whether quota films or not, they never advanced anything that could disturb the fragile peace of the republican regime. Nor did they take sides with the regime emphatically. To them the "system" was a matter of indifference, and even if they went so far as to justify its capitalistic structure and the ways of the rich, they did so in a superficial, lukewarm manner. This kind of indifference is their chief characteristic. They avoid touching upon any essentials, except in a few instances where they infallibly blur the issues. Apart from such stray attempts at profundity, these films appear to be concerned merely with doling out entertainment in an atmosphere of neutrality. They seem cut off from all inner roots. The emotional grounds are frozen. Undeniably, most American and French films of the time were in a similar vein. But in the wake of Locarno it was natural for conditions in all countries involved to approximate each other. And since the strange character of the German postwar screen and the suddenness of its decline are symptoms of a unique development, resemblances between German and foreign films should not be over- rated. They were surface resemblances, produced in the case of Germany by the paralysis of primary impulses. Below the surface, these impulses persisted. Under such peculiar circumstances many German films preserved a character of their own even during these years of international complacency. Before discussing the films of the first group, several series of little interest in this context but still part of the record may at least 138 FROZEN GROUND 139 be mentioned. The resumption, about 1924, of the immediate postwar vogue of sex films and adventurous travel films indicates that after the stabilization of the mark most people experienced the same appetites as after the end of the war. 1 Simultaneously, a host of military films, rich in barracks humor, dull-witted privates and dashing lieutenants, swept across the screen. Drawn from outdated prewar novels and plays, they mirrored the average German's con- fidence in the return of the normal, which to him was unimaginable without a regular army and the sight of uniforms blossoming every- where. 2 While these film types as mere fashions were too short-lived to characterize the period, others failed in the same respect because of their perennial nature. The species of mystery films proved in- destructible, and now that times had changed attracted even a direc- tor like Lupu Pick, who once had known how to arouse less ephemeral shudders. 8 Berlin local comedies featuring the good heart and bright wit of the native population also flourished throughout the stabilized period and longer; a fixed folk genre, they evolved untouched by the course of events. 4 Many films of the group which evidenced society's state of paralysis simply ignored social reality. The comedies among them pretended to be comedies because they consisted of ingredients usu- ally found in comedies. Fred loves Lissy, but does not want to marry her. To stir his jealousy, Lissy engages the gigolo Charley to court her ostentatiously. Charley on his part hankers after the dancer Kitty, and Kitty herself is coveted by the fickle Fred. A double wedding uniting the right couples straightens out matters at the very last moment. This intrigue, which ran under the title BLITZZTJG DEB LIEBE (EXPRESS TRAIN OF LOVE, 1925), roughly illustrates what the comedies were like. 5 They were located nowhere and void of genuine life. When they reproduced a French boulevard comedy, the framework remained and the spirit evaporated. A change of ingredients, and the outcome was dramas as stillborn as the comedies. To simulate liveliness, they often resorted to brisk 1 Of. "Ufa," Das grots* Bilderbuch, 1926, p. 186; Kalbus, Deutsche Filmkunst, I, 49; Ufa VerlMh-Programme, 1928/4, pp. 56-69. a For the vogue of military films, see Kalbus, Deuttche Filmkunst, I, 77-78. 8 Besides Pick's DAS PASTZZHGEWOEIBZ (Tnz AEMOHED VAULT, 1926), Kalbus, Ibid., pp. 87-88, lists a series of mystery films. 4 Cf. Potamkin, "Kino and Lichtspiel," Close Up, Nov. 1929, p. 896. 5 Synopsis of EXPEESS TRAIN OF LOVE in Illustrierter Fikn-Rurier. For other comedies of the time, see, for instance, a Les Presentations de V Alliance Cinemato- graphique Europeenne," Ctnlo-Ctnl, April 1927, p. 14 ff.; Buchner, Im Banne des Filma, p. 140; **Saucy Suzanne," Close Up, Nov. 1927, pp. 65-66. 140 THE STABILIZED PERIOD and picturesque surroundings. A circus, for instance, offered dwer- tissement. But no feat of horsemanship sufficed to make the circus films breathe. Except, perhaps, for Max Reichmann's MANEGE (1927) with its valid emotional content, they invariably handled the stereotyped figures of the clown, the girl and the lover in pure cliches. 6 The same cliches unfolded within music-hall settings, made popular by Dupont's VABIETY. Dupont himself exploited his success in MOULIN ROUGE (1928), which he tried to enliven by means of daredevil driving in a racing car and documentary shots of Paris. Russian milieus, too, were in vogue. In HEIMWEH (HOMESICKNESS, 1927), one saw Russian exiles gather in a Paris boardinghouse and listen nostalgically to national folk-songs played on the piano. It was an exhibition of sentiment fashioned after a commonplace recipe. 7 All these dramas and comedies were manufactured mechani- cally. The escapist tendency to which they testified seems to have been very strong during those years. A multitude of films owed their very existence to outright escapism. The favorite method was to metamorphose certain real towns or landscapes into imaginary locales where all one's yearnings would be fulfilled. German popular songs praised Heidelberg and the Rhine as the eternal playgrounds of a youth immersed in love and the joys of life. These songs were made into films which differed only with regard to the beverages raising the spirits. DER FROHLICHE WEINBEBG (THE GAY VINE- YARD, 1927), based upon Zuckmayer's play of the same title, was a record accumulation of moistened throats and amorous hearts. 8 Paris, the city of light, appeared on the screen as a city of neon lights and frivolous adventures. When in the Paris films a woman feared to lose her inconstant husband, she just disguised herself, went to the Moulin Rouge and there captivated the fugitive anew. For MAireaE, see Kracauer, "Der heutige Film und sein Publikum," Frankfurter Zeitung, Nov. 80, 1928. Other circus films were LOOPING THE Loo*, 1928 (cf. program to the film, and Rotha, Film, Till Now, p. 201) j DIE D*EI CODONAS (cf. synopsis In Ilfastrierter Film-Kiiner) j DIE ZniKtrswtiN^ESsiN (mentioned in Jahrbuch der JF*7m- industrie, 1928/25, p. 87) j etc. 'For Mouriir ROUGE, see Moussinac, Panoramique du Cintma, pp. 76-76; for HOMESICXN-ESS, "Heimweh," Close Up, Dec. 1927, pp. 74-76. Other films featuring Russian motifs: WoroA-WoixiA (1928), cf. program to the film; DER KURIEB DES ZAREN (THE TSAR'S COURIER, 1926), cf. " *Mutterchen* Russland," Ufcb-Magazin, Aug. 27- Sept. 2, 1926; HOCHVBBBA* (HIGH TREASON-, 1929), cf. "Hochverrat," Film-Maffozin, Sept. 29 and Nov. 17, 1929. 8 Program to THI GAY VINEYARD. Kalbus, Deuttche Filmkunst, J, 78-79, lists numerous films based upon popular songs. FROZEN GROUND 141 These films had nothing in common with Rene* Glair's graceful screen poems ; rather, they resembled those de luxe "Paris-at-night" buses which in prewar times transported packets of sightseers from one pleasure spot to another. 9 The paradise of paradises was Vienna. Any obsolete Viennese operetta was dragged to the screen as long as it offered the public an opportunity of escaping from the prosaic republican world to the days of the late Hapsburg monarchy. Trained in romanticizing the past, Ludwig Berger staged EINT WALZERTRAUM (WALTZ DREAM, 1925) after an operetta by Oscar Strauss one of the few German films to become a hit in America. This model film operetta not only satirized court life with a charm kindred to Lubitsch's, but also established that enchanted Vienna which was to haunt the screen from then on. 10 Its components were gentle archdukes, tender flirta- tions, baroque decors, Biedermeier rooms, people singing and drink- ing in a suburban garden restaurant, Johann Strauss, Schubert and the venerable old Emperor. 11 The persistent image of this retrospec- tive Utopia overshadowed the misery of twentieth century Vienna. Incidentally, most Fridericus films included episodes with Austrian officers who might well have appeared in those Vienna concoctions. They were easygoing, music-loving fellows ; the patronizing benevo- lence with which they were depicted implied that such effeminate enemies would be a pushover. Escapist needs determined as well the shape of the documentary films the Kulturflme as they were called in Germany. From about 1924 on, when no other country yet cared much about films of this kind, Ufa produced them with a zeal due mainly to economic factors. The specific difficulties of the stabilization crisis entailed temporary reduction of feature-length entertainment films. The surviving film companies with Ufa in the lead therefore found it expedient to step 9 Paris films of this kind: LIEBE MACHT BLIND (LOVE MAKES OHE BLIND, 1925), cf. synopsis in XUustrierter Fttm-Kwrter; DIE RATTE vox PABIS (THE RAT OF PABXS, 1925), cf. "Emdka-Ronzern," Das gross* B&derbuoh, 1926, p. 53; DAS MODEM, VON MONTPARKASSE (THE MODEL OF MoOTPABXTASSE, 1929), cf. "Das Modell von Mont- parnasse," Fttm-Magazin, April 21, 1929 ; DEE DOMINOSPIELEE vox MONTMAETRE (THE DOMINO PLATER OF MONTMAETOE, 1928), cf. "Comment and Review,* 1 Close Up, May 1928, pp. 80-82; PAITAME (1927), cf. Weyher, "Wir drehen in Paris," UforMagazin, March 25-B1, 192T. 10 Synopsis in Ulustrierter FUm-Runer; Rotha, Film TUl Now, p. 199; Fawcett, Die Welt fas Films, p. 126. Berger also made a Hans Sachs film, DEE MEISTER vox NURNBERG (THE MASOJEB OF NTJBEMBERG, 1927) ; cf. program brochure to this film. 11 For film operettas, see Kalbus, Deutsche Filmkunst, I, 82-88; Kracauer, "Der heutige Film und sein Publlkum," Frankfurter Zettunff, Nor. 80, 1928; etc. 142 THE STABILIZED PERIOD up the production of short subjects, and in the wake of this develop- ment documentaries naturally gained in importance. 12 Perhaps they also owed something to the curiosity ahout externals prevalent now after years of introspection. According to an Ufa brochure of the time, the KuLturfHtne in- cluded the following items: "The heart at work . . . bundles of palpitating nerves . . . ghostly hissing snakes, iridescent beetles . . . infusoria . . . rutting deer, sluggishly staring frogs Oriental cult rites . . . fire-worshipers and Tibetan monasteries, living Buddhas . . . gigantic bridges . . . powerful ships, rail- ways, sluices . . . machines . . . colossal mountains, glaciers lumi- nous with a bewitching alpenglow . . . Mexico's wild buffalo herds . . . nimble-footed Chinese before palanquins, fanning and tea- drinking Japanese women lit by Chinese lanterns ... the Neva Prospect > . . races in Auteuil . . . confusion of the time. . . ." The adjective-laden prospectus ends with the assertion: "The world is beautiful ; its mirror is the Kulturflm" 18 The first Kulturfilm to impress itself upon audiences abroad was Ufa's WEGE ZTJ KRAFT UNB SCHONHEIT (WATS TO HEALTH AND BEAUTY) a feature-length documentary, released in 1925 and re- issued, one year later, in a somewhat altered version. Made with the financial support of the German government, this film circulated in the schools because of what was considered its educational value. In an Ufa publicity pamphlet devoted to its merits, a professional eulogist states that WATS TO HEALTH AND BEAUTY promotes the concept of the "regeneration of the human race." 14 As a matter of fact, the film simply promoted calisthenics and sport. This was done in an omnivorous manner: not content with recording actual achieve- ments in the fields of athletics, hygienic gymnastics, rhythmic gym- nastics, dancing, and so forth, Ufa resurrected the Roman thermae and an antique Greek gymnasium crowded with adolescents posing as the contemporaries of Pericles [Elus. 25]. The masquerade was 13 Jason, ''Zahlen sehen uns an . . ," #5 Jdhre KinematoffrapJi, p. 68. i* Quoted from "30 Kulturftlme," Ufa-Leih. For Kulturfllme of the time, see Jahrbuch der FilntAnduttrte, 1028/25, pp. 24, 28, 84-87; Thomalla, "Der Kulturflim," DM grosie Bilderbuch, 1925 p. 24; Kaufmann, F&mtechnAk imd Kultwr, pp. 20-97; Film Society Programmes, Dec. 1 and Dec. 14, 1980; "New Educational Films from Ufa," Close Up, Sept. 1929, pp. 252-54 ; "Silberkondor fiber Feuerland," Close Up* Dec. 1929, pp. 542-48; Weiss, "The Secret of the Egg-Shell," Close Up, May 1930, pp. 421-22 ; etc. The Kulturfilme are commented upon by Kracauer, *T)er heutige Film und sein Publikum," Frankfurter Zettwiff, Nov. 80, 1928. 14 Quotation from Hollander, "The Road to Beauty and Strength," Wege vu Kraft wid Schbnheit, p. 50. See also Fib* Society Programme, NOT. 18, 1927. FROZEN GROUND 143 easy inasmuch as many of the athletes performed stark naked. Of course, this sight offended the prudish, but Ufa held that perfect bodily beauty was bound to evoke joys of a purely aesthetic order, and found its idealism rewarded by good box-office takes. Aestheti- cally speaking, the reconstructions of antiquity were tasteless, the sport pictures excellent, and the bodily beauties so massed together that they affected one neither sensually nor aesthetically. Owing to their scientific thoroughness and competent photogra- phy, the Ufa Kulturfilme developed into a German specialty in great demand on the international market, 16 Yet their workmanship could not compensate for their amazing indifference to human problems. By passing off calisthenics as a means to regenerate mankind, WATS TO HEALTH AND BEAUTY diverted contemporaries from the evils of the time which no calisthenics would remedy. All these documen- taries excelled in evasiveness. They mirrored the beautiful world; but their concern with the beauty of "nimble-footed Chinese before palanquins" made them overlook the misery these beautiful coolies endured. They mirrored "the confusion of the time" ; but instead of penetrating the confusion, they gloated over it, thus leaving the audience more confused than ever. They spread information on wild buffalo herds and fire-worshipers; but their insistence upon exotic matters of no use to the spectator enabled them to withhold from him any essential information regarding his everyday life. Through their escapist neutrality the Ufa KidturftLme revealed that their submission to the rules of the republican "system" was by no means tantamount to true acceptance. Not all films refrained from facing social reality. The so-called Zille films a species flourishing in 1925 and 1926 showed them- selves much concerned with real-life incidents. Heinrich Zille was a Berlin draftsman who, driven by pity for the underdog, specialized in portraying the human fauna crowding Berlin's proletarian quar- ters. His drawings of undernourished children, workers, wretched girls, organ-grinders in ugly backyards, destitute women and non- descripts idling away their time enjoyed great popularity among the Germans. Gerhart Lamprecht brought these drawings to life in DIE VERRUFENEN (SLUMS or BERLIN, 1925), which he built around personal observations retailed to him by Zille. An engineer who has committed perjury to shield his fiancee finds himself an outcast after leaving prison. Unable to get a job, he attempts sui- 15 Jason, **Zahlen schen uns an . . ," $6 John Cinematograph, p. 68. 144 THE STABILIZED PERIOD cide, and is saved by a good-hearted girl who promptly falls in love with him. She belongs to a Zille milieu characterized by such figures as a kind photographer and a gang of minor criminals. The engineer becomes attached to these people and begins to make his living as a simple factory worker. Soon he rises again : the factory owner dis- covers his talents and promotes him to a socially respectable position. To complete the engineer's happiness the good-hearted girl conven- iently dies, so that he need feel no compunction about marrying the socially respectable sister of the factory owner. 16 The formula underlying this plot is compounded of two ingredi- ents. On the one hand, the film-makers pretend to tackle the social problem by harping on the sufferings of the proletariat; on the other, they evade the social problem by giving one particular worker (who is not even really of that class) a lucky break. Their design is obviously to trick the spectator into the illusion that he, too, might be upwardbound, and thus make him stick to the "sys- tem." Perhaps class differences are fluid after all, the plot sug- gests, and its sham frankness in exposing the predicament of the lower classes serves to invigorate that daydream of social redemp- tion. Films based upon this formula not only explored the picturesque Zille world, but also penetrated the sphere of the white-collar workers to promote a manicurist or switchboard operator among them: one Lotte landing in the arms of a rich bridegroom would reward the wishful thinking of all Lottes. 17 To be sure, such day- dreams were produced elsewhere as well; but the German specimens advertised the existing regime in a particularly detached, if not absent-minded, manner. They relied on the alluring effect of pro- motions to a higher social level at a time when, because of the stream- lining of big business, promotions of that kind had become extremely scarce. They presented upper-class people in such a way that choice night-clubs and shining cars appeared as the ultimate goal of all human endeavor. When Hollywood dealt with similar themes, events and characters at least preserved a faint vestige of liveliness. These "Program brochure to the film. Cf. Weinberg, /Scrapbook*, 1925-27; "Wissen Sie schon?" Das grosse Bilderbuch, p. 145. Kalbus, Deutsche Fitmkunst, I, 59, lists a num- ber of such "Zille" films. Among them may be mentioned DIE GESTTNKENEIT (THE STTNKEN, 1926) with Asta, Nielsen, and DAS EUWACHEN- DBS WEIBES (WOMAN'S AWAKENING, 1927). Cf. programs to these films. 17 For critical comment on the whole trend, see Kracauer, "Der heutige Film und sein Publikum," Frankfurter Zeitung, Nov. 0, 1928. FROZEN GROUND 145 German films were artificial and oblique products. And yet they found response. Spirits were barren. Other films aimed at manipulating those who were too discon- tented with the general social and political conditions to let them- selves be drugged by Zille films and the like. The recipe was primitive: one tried to neutralize pent-up indignation by directing it against evils of small importance. Several films of the time stigmatized rigors of the penal code. KREUZZUG DES WEIBES (UNWELCOME CHILDREN, 1926) attacked the provisions against unlawful abortion, while the Nero film GESCHLECHT IN FESSELN (SEX IN FETTERS, 1928) cam- paigned for prison reform. 18 Since both films, moreover, emphasized sex matters, they were bound to arouse a mixture of indignation and sensuality which could not but increase their value as safety valves. If, as it happened, some film or other assumed a radical attitude, that radicalism invariably turned against powers long since over- thrown. Two mediocre screen versions of Gerhart Hauptmann plays DEE WEBER (THE WEAVERS, 1927) and DER BIBERPELZ (THE BEAVER COAT, 1928) combated the early capitalists and the con- ceited authorities under the Kaiser. 19 Among these anachronistic affairs was one of the best films of the period: Hans Behrendt's DEE HOSE (ROYAL SCANDAL, 1927), fashioned after a prewar com- edy by Carl Sternheim. It concerned a romantic intrigue be- tween the sovereign of a small principality and the wife of a petty official who, instead of objecting to being cuckolded, felt highly elated over his fate because the wise sovereign did not forget to promote and decorate him. Even though film experts held that ROYAL SCANDAL was too high-brow to be good business, this **blend of grand burlesque and satire," as Potamkin called it, ingratiated itself with German moviegoers. 20 They relished the acting of Werner Krauss, who endowed the petty official with all the traits of the Ger- man philistine. When they laughed at him, they may have believed that they laughed at a former, pretty ridiculous stage of their own existence. But their laughter was mixed with emotional concern, for they could not help secretly craving that lost era with its pro- tective sovereigns and sparkling medals. 18 For UNWELCOME CHJUDHEST, see Buchner, Im Bonne des Films, p. 142 ; for SEX isr FETTERS, B., "Geschlecht la Fesseln," Olose Up, Dec. 1928, pp. 69-71. 19 Cf. Zaddach, Der Hteraarische Film, p. 71, and Kracauer, "Der heutige Film und sein Publikum," Frankfurter Zeitung, Nov. 80, 1928. ao potamkln, "Kino and Lichtspiel." Close Up, Nov. 1929, p. 895. See also pro- gram to ROYAL SCAXDAL, and FreedJey and Reeves, History of the Theatre, p. 514. 146 THE STABILIZED PERIOD The testimony of film content was borne out by that of methods of presentation: they, too, betrayed the paralysis of the collective mind. It was as if, along with sensibility to essential content, the whole film sense had weakened. Instead of narrating the story through a display of adequate pictures, directors who should have known better degraded the pictures to mere illustrations of the story. Plot and imagery fell asunder, and the latter was confined to the role of an accompaniment that added nothing. Many a film gave the impression of having been drawn from a novel, even if that novel did not exist. The strange debilitation of the film sense affected cinematic tech- niques. Devices that up to 1924* had been developed to express definite meanings turned into meaningless routine matters from 1924 on. Having learned how to move a camera, the cameraman let it run wild on every occasion. 21 Close-ups became a habit. Directors would not even take the trouble to vary them, but would use stand- ardized sets of close-ups to render commonplace events that were quite understandable without any such insertions. Whenever the leading character of a film mounted a train, the audience could count on being informed of his departure by fragments of the loco- motive and slowly revolving wheels. In SHATTERED, close shots of that kind had had a structural function 22 ; in these films, they were ready-made ornaments products of an absent-mindedness that also accounted for the negligent handling of many details. The sumptu- ous screen lobbies of de luxe hotels recalled real lobbies but vaguely, and when the whole of a building and one of its parts were shown, that part seemed to belong to another building. The mechanization of all editing procedures was conspicuous. In the case of night-club episodes, no film-maker could resist the tempta- tion of illustrating ecstasy at its height through a cliche juxtapo- sition of performing legs, giant saxophone tubes and staggering torsos. Many films referred to the first World War: even the re- motest reference to it sufficed to provoke the sudden appearance of barbed-wire fences, marching columns and shell-bursts stock mate- rial cut in automatically. Fixed types of transitions predominated. One of them connected two different objects by inserting details of them in close-up. If, for instance, the scene was to shift from an al See, for instance, "Die entfesselte Kamera," UfarMaffovin, March 26-81, 1927. For the run-of-the-mffl techniques of the period, see Kracauer, "Der heutige Film und sein Publikum," Frankfurter Zeitung, Nov. 80, 1928. a* Cf. p. 108. FROZEN GROUND 147 elegant gentleman to a poor woman, the camera first focused upon the gentleman, then tilted down to his shoes, stopped there until the shoes had transformed themselves into those of the woman, and finally tilted up again to make the woman appear. Most Ufa come- dies included picture units that paralleled the behavior of some actor to that of a pet animal. When a glamour girl was all sunshine, her Pekingese would be in high spirits as well ; when the Pekingese became morose, one could be fairly sure that the subsequent shot would show big tears gliding down the girl's cheeks. There was no lack of grade-A films produced with all the crafts- manship of which the German studios were capable, but most of them dealt with unimportant subjects or drained important subjects of their significance. What made these elite products seem different from the standardized average output was mainly their technical perfection that consummate grand-style manner in which they handled nothing as if it were something. They simulated content. It was through this very pretentiousness that they testified to the exist- ing paralysis. Since THE LAST LAUGH had been a world success, Carl Mayer and F. W. Murnau continued collaborating; the outcome was TAR- TUFFE (1925), an Ufa superproduction, in which the two artists paid tribute to the grand-style manner [Ulus. 26] . The paralysis was all- pervading. Mayer seemed aware of its contagious power, and, as if he felt that the indifference around and in him would do away with any immediacy of thought and emotion and thus engender a deep and general hypocrisy, he tried in TARTUFFE to emphasize hypoc- risy as the basic vice of contemporary society. This he did by means of a story framing his screen version of Moliere's comedy. The film opens with a prologue showing a wealthy old gentleman in the clutches of his housekeeper who, another Tartuffe, courts him brazenly. To open the old fool's eyes, his grandson invites him and the housekeeper to a screening of Tartuffe he has been clever enough to prearrange. Here the prologue ends, and Tartuffe com- mences. Like the play in Hamlet, this film within a film fulfills an enlightening mission: in the epilogue the female legacy-hunter is ousted. But elaborate production snowed under what Mayer had to impart. The critics dismissed the modern framing story as an un- necessary addition. The rendering of Moliere culminated in moments of accomplished acting and such decorative finesse as "the lace 148 THE STABILIZED PERIOD in the final bedroom scene, the pattern of the bed cover- ing, the porcelain clock on the fireplace/' and so forth. 28 It was a slick theatrical performance. Much as the camera hovered about, it subordinated itself always to Jannings and the other players instead of using them for purposes of its own. 24 This TAKTUFFE, far from bringing home hypocrisy to the audience, was itself Tartuffish, for it flattered an audience anxious to leave things in the depths un- touched, Before going to Hollywood, Murnau staged another Ufa super- production: FAUST (1926). Ufa seemed determined to make this film a cultural monument. Hans Kyser's script exploited Marlowe and Goethe and German folk sagas, and Gerhart Hauptmann, Ger- many's foremost poet, composed the film titles. Technical ingenuity was lavished on angelic apparitions and devilish conjuring tricks. Karl Freund's camera rushed on a roller coaster of his own inven- tion through a vast, studio-built landscape filled with towns, woods and villages, and the views thus obtained enabled the spectators to participate in the aerial trip Mephistopheles undertook with the rejuvenated Faust. Their flight was a celestial sensation. But neither the roller coaster nor Gerhart Hauptmann could compensate for the futility of a film which misrepresented, if not ignored, all significant motifs inherent in its subject-matter. 25 The metaphysical conflict between good and evil was thoroughly vulgarized, and the drawn-out love story between Faust and Margarete induced the critic of the National Board of Review Magazine to remark: e *We find ourselves descending from the masculine version of Marlowe and the philosophical concept of Goethe to the level of the libretto which inspired Gounod to write his opera." 2e FAUST was not so much a cultural monument as a monumental display of artifices capitalizing on the prestige of national culture. The obsolete theatrical poses to which the actors resorted betrayed the falsity of the whole. While the film had considerable success abroad, it met with indifference in Germany itself. The Germans of the time did not take to Faustian as Quoted from Rotha, Film Till Now, p. 198. Cf. Weinberg, Scrapbooks, 1927; Zaddach, J>er UterartecTie Film, pp. 59-60; Film Society Programme, April 1, 1928. *< Cf . "Tartuffe, the Hypocrite," National Board of Review Magazine, May 1928, p. 6. 35 Program brochure to the film; Botha, FUm Till Now, p. 198; Vincent, Mistoire dd VArt Cingmatographique, p. 152; "Die entfesselte Karaera," Ufa-Magazin. March 25-81, 1927; Cinta-Cint, March 15, 1927, pp. 19-20. 86 "Faust," National Board of Review Magazine, Nov. 1920, p, 10. See also Potarakia, "The Rise and Fall of the German Film," Cinema, April 1980, p. 59. FROZEN GROUND 149 problems, and moreover resented any interference with their tradi- tional notions of the classics. 27 Outstanding instances of grand-style manner were the three films Fritz Lang produced during the stabilized period. They dealt with thrilling adventures and technical fantasies symptomatic of the then current machine cult. The first of them was METROPOLIS, an Ufa production released at the beginning of 1927. Lang relates that he conceived the idea of this internationally known film when from shipboard he saw New York for the first time a nocturnal New York glittering with myriad lights. 28 The city built in his film is a sort of super New York, realized on the screen with the aid of the so-called Shuftan process, an ingenious mirror device permitting the substitution of little models for giant structures. 29 This screen metropolis of the future consists of a lower and an upper city. The latter a grandiose street of skyscrapers alive with an inces- sant stream of air taxis and cars is the abode of big-business owners, high-ranking employees and pleasure-hunting gilded youth. In the lower city, shut off from daylight, the workers tend monstrous machines. They are slaves rather than workers. The film elaborates upon their rebellion against the master class in the upper world, and ends with the reconciliation of the two classes. However, what is important here is not so much the plot as the preponderance of surface features in its development. In the bril- liant laboratory episode, the creation of a robot is detailed with a technical exactitude that is not at all required to further the action. The office of the big boss, the vision of the Tower of Babel, the machinery and the arrangement of the masses: all illustrate Lang's penchant for pompous ornamentation. 80 In NIBELTTNGEN, his decora- tive style was rich in meaning; in METROPOLIS, the decorative not only appears as an end in itself, but even belies certain points made through the plot. It makes sense that, on their way to and from the machines, the workers form ornamental groups ; but it is nonsensical to force them into such groups while they are listening to a com- forting speech from the girl Maria during their leisure time. In his exclusive concern with ornamentation, Lang goes so far as to com- 27 Jacobs, American Film, p. 810; "Was is los?" Ufv-Magazin, Feb. 4-10, 1927; "Erlauterungen," Ftim-Photot, p. 58. 38 Information offered by Mr. Lang. 89 Information offered by Mr. Shuftan* 3Cf. Rotha, CtlMoid, pp. 280-32; "Die entfesselte Kamera," Ufa-Maga&in, March 25-81, 1927; Jahier, "42 Ans de Cin&na," Le B6le intellectual du Cintma, p. 62. 150 THE STABILIZED PERIOD pose decorative patterns from the masses who are desperately trying to escape the inundation of the lower city. Cinematically an incom- parable achievement, this inundation sequence is humanly a shocking failure [Dlus. 28]. METBOPOUS impressed the German public. The Americans relished its technical excellence; the English remained aloof; the French were stirred by a film which seemed to them a blend of Wagner and Rrupp, and on the whole an alarming sign of Germany's vitality. 81 Lang's subsequent film, the mystery thriller SPIONE (THE SPY, 1928), shared two traits with his DR. MABTJSE. It featured a master spy who, like Mabuse, led several different lives : besides the spy, he was also the president of a bank and a music-hall clown. And exactly like DR. MABUSE, this new film refrained from conferring moral superiority upon the representatives of the law. 32 Espionage and counterespionage were on the same level two gangs fighting each other in a chaotic world. Yet there was one important difference: while Dr. Mabuse had incarnated the tyrant who takes advantage of the chaos around him, the master spy indulged in the spy business for the sole purpose, it seemed, of spying. He was a formalized Mabuse devoted to meaningless activities. By emphasizing this figure, the film reflected the neutrality prevalent during that period a neutrality which also manifested itself in the absence of any distinction between legal and illegal pursuits and in a prodigal abundance of disguises. No character was what he appeared to be. This constant change of identities was appropriate to denote a state of mind in which the paralysis of the self interfered with any attempt at self-identification. As if to fill the void, Lang piled up sensations which conveyed no meaning. His imaginative virtuosity in shaping them reached its climax with a train wreck in a tunnel. Since it proved impossible to stage the catastrophe in life-size proportions, he gave the impression of it through confused mental images of the persons involved in this shock situation. THE SPY would have been a true forerunner of the Hitchcock thrillers if Lang had not fashioned it after the pompous manner of METROPOLIS, so that empty sensations took on the air of sub- stantial revelations. Virtuosity alienated from content posed as art. In accordance with this pretense, Ufa issued a volume that was a 31 While H. G. Wells damned METRQPOUS as "quite the silliest film" (Rotha, Film Titt Now, p. 194), Conan Doyle was enthusiastic about it (cf. "Was is los?" Ufa- Magaxin, April 15-21, 1927). For further comment on METROPOLIS, see p. 162 ff. 32 Cf. p. 88. FROZEN GROUND 151 triumph of bookbinding though it contained nothing but the Thea von Harbou novel from which THE SPY had been made. 88 In his third film, DEE FRAU IM MOND (THE Gmi, m THE MOON, 1929), Lang imagined a rocket projectile carrying passen- gers to the moon. The cosmic enterprise was staged with a surprising veracity of vision; the plot was pitiable for its emotional short- comings. These were so obvious that they discredited many an illusion Lang tried to create by showy virtuosity. The lunar landscape smelled distinctly of Ufa's Neubabelsberg studios. 84 Other films in grand-style manner masked their insignificance by assuming the character of tragedies. It was easy: you had only to introduce some unlucky incident and make it appear a fateful event. In Ufa's Henny Porten film ZUFLTJCHT (REFUGE, 1928), a young man who had once run away from his bourgeois parents to join the proletariat returns to his native town, completely disillu- sioned. A poor girl there takes care of the broken ex-revolutionary, and his parents are finally willing to accept him and the pregnant girl. Happiness seems close at hand, but Ufa, inexorable, frustrates it. At the very last moment the young man dies a death designed to impress tragedy upon the audience. 35 Since he had been a revolu- tionary, Ufa may also have considered his death morally justified* In cases in which a tragic outcome was not held opportune, the films in grand-style manner frequently relied on the spell of beautiful settings to conceal their emptiness. Bergner in DONA JTTANA (1928) was seen before the fountains of Granada and on the roads Don Quixote had trodden. It was all trappings. Even the documentaries inclined to be grandiloquent. The Ufa Kulturflm NATTO UND LIEBE (NATURE AND LOVE) combined with its scenes of sex life monumental visions of mankind's birth and 83 Program brochure to the film; Rotha, Film Till Now, p. 193, and Celluloid, p. 228; Herring, "Reasons of Rhyme," Close Up, Get 1929, pp. 280-81. 84 Rotha, Celluloid, pp. 282-8T; Dreyfus, "La Femme sur la Lune," La Revue fa Cintma, May 1980, pp. 62-68,* "Frau fan Mond," Close Up, Nov. 1929, pp. 448^44; Jahier, "48 Ans de Cinema," Le Bole wtellectuel fa Cw4ma t p. 62; Arnheim, Film als Kunft, p. 180. 85 Kracauer, "Der heutige Film und se!n Publikum," Frankfurter Zeitung, Dec. 1, 1928. See also "Zuflucht," Ufa-Leih.In this context, several costume films more or less affected by the predominant grand-style manner should at least be mentioned: MAKOS- LESCAUT, 1926 (cf. Rotha, Film Till Now, pp. 200-1, and lUustrierter Film- Kurier) ; DER ROSENKAVALIER, 1926 (cf. Kalbus, Deutsche FUmkunst, I, 81) ; MAKHN LUTHER, 1928 (cf. "Martin Luther," National Board of Review Magazine, Oct. 1928, p. 4, and Blakeston, "Snap," Close Up, May 1929, pp. 41-42) ; ScniNDERHAsnsrES, 1928 (Rotha, ibid., p. 206, and Hellmund-Waldow, "Alraune and Schinderhannes," Close Up, March 1928, pp. 46-48) ; NAPOUEOK AUF ST. HEUSITA, 1929 (program to this film). 152 THE STABILIZED PERIOD rise. 36 Similarly, the KuLtwrfilm WUNDER DER SCHOPFUNG (MIRA- CLES OP CREATION, 1925) not only pictured present-day miracles, but foreshadowed astronomical events of the future, including the wholesale death of our universe. According to the prospectus to this latter film, Ufa was convinced that the sight of such astronomi- cal events would induce any thinking spectator to become aware of the utter unimportance of his ephemeral existence. 37 In other words, the tragic destiny of the cosmos was exhibited to deflect the spec- tator's attention from the problems of everyday life. Grand-style manner in such instances as this helped to stupefy social conscious- ness. 36 Kracauer, "Der heutige Film und sein Publikum," Frankfurter Zeitung, Nov, 30, 1928. 37 Ufa Verleih-Programme, 1924/25, p. 102. 13, THE PROSTITUTE AND THE ADOLESCENT THE second group of films that appeared during the stabilized era allows one to specify the psychological contents then paralyzed. Having no direct outlet, they made themselves known in a devious and distorted way. A number of films of this group divulged their messages after the manner of dreams ; it is as if they were the con- fessions of someone talking in his sleep. A few films, stragglers of a bygone era, reveal that the old psychological unrest continued to smolder in the collective soul. In 1926, Henrik Galeen staged a second STUDENT VON PRAG (THE STUDENT OF PRAGUE), which differed thematically from the first only in that it put more emphasis on the psychological significance of the plot. This beautiful, if in some respects questionable, version of Wegener*s prewar film deliberately interpreted Baldwin's fight with his double as a fight with his other self. 1 The film was a big success in Germany; it seemed to make the Germans realize their own duality, which during the stabilized period was deepened by the latent conflict between republican institutions and paralyzed author- itarian dispositions. Galeen's picture, which was full of E. T. A. Hoffmann reminiscences, sensitized these dispositions and all the impulses and longings connected with them. It may have been the story's inherent material that caused the Nazis to release another STUDENT OP PRAGUE in 1936. Expert in fantastic horror films, Galeen also made ALRAUNE (UNHOLY LOVE, 1928), which was based upon a novel by H. H. Ewers. A scientist (Paul Wegener), experimenting in artificial im- pregnation, creates a human being: Alraune, daughter of a hanged criminal and a prostitute. This creature, portrayed by Brigitte Helm as a somnambulant vamp with seductive and empty features, ruins 1 "The Mem Who Cheated Life," National Board of Review Magazine, Feb. 1929, pp., 10-11; H. D., "Conrad Veidt, The Student of Prague," Clots Up, Sept. 1927, pp. 86-48; Blakeston, "An Epic Please I" ibid., p. 65; Rotha, FUm Till Now, pp. 202-8, 285; Ilkutrterter Fttm-Kwritr (synopsis of the film); Wesse, Grossmacht Film, pp. 127-28. 158 154 THE STABILIZED PERIOD all those who are in love .with her, and at the end destroys herself. 2 Alraune's family resemblance to Homunculus is apparent. In her case, too, abnormal origins are called upon to account for inner frustration and its devastating consequences. The story aroused sufficient interest to be made into a talkie a few years later. This indicates that among the paralyzed psychological processes those to which the film referred were of consequence. Several films remotely akin to the instinct and peasant dramas of the postwar years glorified nature to be more precise, the inter- relationship between human nature and external nature. Regardless of whether they rendered storms or frosts, farmers or fishermen, they placed the laws of nature an eternally unchanging nature above the decrees of autonomous reason. Their sporadic appearance testified to the existence of a romanticizing tendency which had been strengthened by suffering resulting from the streamlining of all working processes. This tendency, hostile to the intellect as such, turned not only against a rationalism which ignored the friendly forces of nature, but also against the ever-repeated attempts of reason to defeat nature's destructive forces manifesting themselves through tyranny. Widespread as such an anti-intellectualism was, it expressed itself not so much on the screen as in philosophy and literature which means that it was actually prevented from achiev- ing full expression in that period. Among the films subordinating reason to nature, Fritz Wend- hausen's DER SOHN DER HAGAR (OUT OP THE MIST, 1927) ranked high because of its magnificent pictures of snowy woods, spring scenery and old-fashioned interiors. It was a romance elaborating upon the return of a handsome young man to his native mountain village. He arrives from faraway "large cities," and becomes in- volved in passions springing up in a wayside inn and a sawmill. 8 The ties between the villagers and their land are so indissoluble that he appears as an intruder up to the end. In her review of the film, Miss Lejeune states that "every achieved action, every enduring motive springs from the life of the soil . . . while the foreign emo- tions remain unfulfilled." 4 The affiliation of this cult of the soil with a Cf. Hellmund-Waldow, "Alraune and Schinderhannes," Close Up, March 1928, pp. 49-50; etc. In a similar vein was Wiene's OBLAC'S HANDE (THE HANDS OP OBLAC, 1925) ; cf. Film Society Programme, Oct. 24, 1926. 3 "Films of the Month: Out of the Mist," Close Up, Oct. 1927, p. 85. 4 Lejeune, Cinema, p. 284. See also Rotha, Film Till Now, p. 206. For other films of this kind, see Martini, "Nature and Human Fate," Close Up, Nov. 1927, pp. 10-14; Das grosse Bilderbuch, 1925, p. 875; etc. THE PROSTITUTE AND THE ADOLESCENT 155 authoritarian behavior was to be revealed by the blood-and-soil lit- erature of the Nazis. Dr. Arnold Fanck continued his series of mountain films with the already-mentioned HOLT MOUNTAIN and a rather insignificant comedy. 5 The yield was slight. Under the sun of Locarno, the heroic idealism of the mountain climbers seemed to melt away like the snow in the valleys. Yet it survived and, as prosperity drew to a close, again attained the heights in DIE WEISSE HOI/LE VON Piz PAI.U (THE WHITE HELL OP PITZ PALU, 1929), in which Ernst Udet's daredevil flights matched the stunt ascensions. Fanck made this cinematically fascinating film with the aid of G. W. Pabst, who probably did his best to cut down emotional exuberance. 6 However, sentimentality was inseparable from that variety of idealism. The national films of the stabilized period were also affected by the general apathy. In a number of them patriotic fervor seemed suspended. A Bismarck film, released in 1926, was a purely matter- of-fact biography. 7 DEB, WELTKRIEG (WORLD WAR, 1927) an Ufa documentary in three parts utilizing stock candid-camera work resulted from the express design of "^presenting the historic facts with incontestable objectivity." 8 This filnr? included an important innovation: maps illustrating battle arrays and army evolutions after the manner of animated cartoons. Sven Noldan, their creator, called them a means of giving the illusion of phenomena not to be found in camera reality. 9 He was also to make the maps for the Nazi war films BAPTISM OF FIRE and VICTORY IN THE WEST, but in these films their propaganda function of symbolizing Nazi Ger- many's irresistible military might was to overshadow their character as objective statements. (It is, by the way, not surprising that Le*on Poirier's war documentary VERDUN, 1928, rivaled WORLD WAR in neutrality: to some extent, the Treaty of Locarno determined the outlook of both the French and the German partner.) THE EMDEN 5 Cf. p. 112. For THE How MOUNTAIN-, see Kalbus, Deutsche F&mkuiwt, I, 92; Weinberg, Scrapbooka, 1927; for the comedy, DEB GEOSSE SPRUNG (THE BIG JTTMP, 1927), Kalbus, tWd., and Ilfastrierter Filmr-Kwrier. Fanck also wrote the script of another mountain film, DEE KJLMPF TJMB MATXEEHOEXT (STRUGGLE FOE THE MATEEE- HOEN, 1928). Rotha, CelMoid, pp. 82-fl8; "The White Hell of Piz Pain," Close Up, Dec. 1929, p. 54*8. 7 For BISMARCK, see Kalbus, Devtsche FZmkunxt, I, 57. 8 Quoted from Krieger, "Wozu ein Weltkriegsfilm?" Ufctr-Magazin (Sondernum- mer: Der Weltkrieg). See also IlJuttrierter FQmrKwrter. 9 Noldan, "Die Darstellung der Schlachten," Ufa-Magazin (Sondernummer: Der Weltkrieg). 156 THE STABILIZED PERIOD (1926) and U-9 WEDDIGEN (1927), two films of fiction extolling w^ar feats o the German navy, were no less eager to seem impartial. An American correspondent who attended the premiere of U-9 WED- DiGEtf during a Berlin Stahlhelm convention praised it for avoiding nationalistic coloring. 10 This reserve was not general. The Fridericus films of the period and several Hndred films similarly exploiting top figures of Prussian history indulged in an obtrusive patriotism. 11 However, their patri- otism had an outright cliche* character which, exactly like the neu- trality of WORLD WAB or EMDEN, suggested the existing paralysis of nationalistic passions. As a matter of fact, the public of the Dawes Plan era considered these patriotic cut-to-pattern films somewhat antiquated reminiscences. Two of them KONIGIN LUISE ( QUEEN LUISE, 1927) and WATERLOO (1929) were made by Karl Grune. The direction Grune took after his memorable THE STREET is revealing. He approached vital problems from different angles in a cinematically interesting way. His ARABELLA (1925) was a melo- dramatic survey of human life seen through the eyes of a horse ; his EIFERSTTCHT (JEALOUSY, 1925) transferred the main motif of WARNING SHADOWS into realistic surroundings 12 ; his AM RANDE DER WELT (AT THE EDGE OF THE WORLD, 1927) treated an "uncon- vincing pacifist theme*' in the form of a saga set against an impres- sive landscape. 18 Then, as if overwhelmed by disillusion, he renounced any emotional directness, and fell back on the conventionalism of his- torical costume films. WATERLOO, in which he adopted Abel Gance's idea of projecting simultaneous events on three screens, concen- trated upon Bliicher's triumph over Napoleon; it was a Bliicher played by Otto Gebiihr, alias Frederick the Great. 14 As has been stated in an earlier chapter, the appearance of some Frederick would be needed to release the philistine in THE STREET from the sadness of his plush parlor: Grune's development was logical. It was also the outcome of inner exhaustion and as such once more pointed to the paralysis behind these patriotic films. 10 Quoted from Weinberg, Scrapbook*, 1927. For THE EMDEK, see Bryher, "The War from Three Angles," Close Up, July 1927, p. 20. "Kallras, Deutsche Ftimkunyt, I, 56-57. 1J *Por QtJiEar LUISE and AEABEIXA, see programs to these films; for JEALOUSY, Vincent, Siitotr* de ?Art Qinmatographigue y p. 150, and IWwtrierter Ftim-Kurier. 13 Quoted from Rotha, Film Till Now, pp. 201-2. See also P. L. H., "Films in the Provinces," Close Up, June 1929, p. 56$ "Wie ein Film entsteht," U April 29_May 5, 1927. According to Rotha the script was by Carl Mayer. 14 Vincent, Sistoire dt VArt CinSmatoffraphique, p, 150. THE PROSTITUTE AND THE ADOLESCENT 157 Much pertinent information can be derived from a series of films which may be called "street" films, because they resumed the theme Grune had introduced in THE STREET. Their concern with the street was so intense that they rarely failed to include the word, or a synonym, in their titles. On the surface, these films were nothing but derivatives of Grune's film : they, too, featured a rebellious individual who would break away from home and security, follow his passions on the street and at the end again submit to the exigencies of conventional life. However, what seemed a mere repetition of Grune's story in fact differed from it essentially. The street in the street films was no longer the dreadful jungle it appeared in THE STREET of 1923 ; it was a region harboring virtues that had deserted bourgeois society. To be sure, the outcast as the "keeper of the flame 5 ' was not at all a novelty on the stage, but on the German screen this figure became an institution only during the stabilized period. In Pabst's DIE FREUDLOSE GASSE (THE JOYLESS STREET, 1925), which will be dis- cussed later, 15 the sole character manifesting true inner grandeur was a girl with all the earmarks of a prostitute. Abandoned by her lover for a wealthy match, she kills a socialite who might have thwarted his marriage project, and then confesses her crime before the judge to clear her lover from suspicion of being himself the murderer. While this girl was only of episodic importance, a character of similar magnanimity played the leading part in Bruno Rahn's im- pressive and successful DIRNENTRAGODIE (TRAGEDY OF THE STREET, 1927) : she was an elderly, worn-out prostitute. Walking her beat, she stumbles upon a drunken young man a bourgeois offspring who, after a quarrel with his parents, has left home for the street. She takes him to her room, and is foolish enough to believe him in love with her. During her absence she goes out to invest her sav- ings in a confectionery shop, so as to become worthy of him her souteneur introduces him to Clarissa, a pretty young streetwalker, for whom he abandons the old prostitute. She is wounded deeply; but what grieves this loving heart most is not so much her own misery as the thought that life with Clarissa may spoil the boy's whole future. In her despair, she incites her souteneur to kill the girl. Detectives track down the murderer, and the prostitute herself com- mits suicide. On the door of the shabby rooming-house a signboard reads "Room to Let." Back home, the boy performs the well-known 15 Cf. p. 167 ff. 158 THE STABILIZED PERIOD gesture: he sobs, his head sheltered in his mother's lap. 16 Asta Niel- sen, emerging from the spheres of Ibsen and Strindberg, portrayed the prostitute incomparably: not a realistic one, but that imaginary figure of an outcast who has discarded social conventions because of her abundance of love, and now, through her mere existence, defies the questionable laws of a hypocritical society 17 [Ulus. 29]. Joe May's ASPHALT (1929) one of the films Erich Pommer sug- gested and supervised after his return from America surpassed TRAGEDY OP THE STREET in explicitness. The boy who in ASPHALT risks his professional honor in a love adventure with a thievish tart is a traffic cop and moreover the son of a police sergeant Crown Prince Frederick rebelling against, and finally submitting to, his father. The act of submission itself acquires new meaning in this film. When towards the end the traffic cop is indicted for having murdered a man in the tart's flat, the girl volunteers a confession of her own complicity that exonerates him. She is marched off to the prison. But the young crown prince of the police follows her with his eyes, and his gaze implies a promise of loyalty and ensuing marriage. 18 Here the street penetrates the bourgeois parlor a pene- tration which also marks the end of DIE CARMEN VON ST.-PATTLI (CARMEN OF ST. PAUL, 1928), another of this series. 19 In the street films, two dimensions of life were interrelated which in Grune's THE STREET had been incompatible with each other. The imagery of the street films reveals that in the Germany of the time the street exerted an irresistible attraction. Paul Rotha remarks of Rahn's TRAGEDY or THE STREET: "Throughout, all things led back to the street; its pavements with the hurrying, soliciting feet; its dark corners and angles; its light under the sentinel lamp-posts." 20> The street in this film, Rotha adds, was mainly characterized by the motif of "the feet that walk over its stones" a motif traceable to that close shot which in the Grune 16 Herring, "La Trage"die de la Rue," Close Up, July 1928, pp. 31-40; Buchner, Im Banne dea Films, pp. 12O-21; Bardeche and Brasfllach, History of Motion Pic- turea, p. 254. 17 Asta Nielsen was also featured in HEDDA GABLEB. (1925) and LASTEE DEB MEITSCHHEIT (LUSTS OF MAN-BUTO, 1927). For the latter film, see Blakeston, "Lusts of Mankind," Close Up, Nov. 1928, pp. 88-4.1. Jahier speaks of "Papparition baudelai- rienne d'Asta Nielsen" in THE JOYIESS STREET ("42 Ans de Cinema," Le R6le tn- tellectuel du Cinjma, p. 68). See also Mungenast, Asta Nielsen. 18 Synopsis of film in Ittustrierter Film-Eurier. Cf. Grregor, Zeitalter dea Films, pp. 209-10. 19 Synopsis of film in Illuttrierter FilntrKurier. fl o Rotha, Film Till iVoio, p. 206. THE PROSTITUTE AND THE ADOLESCENT 159 film showed the philistine's legs following a wavy line on the pave- ment. Rahn's film opens with an incident photographed at the level of a dog's eyes: the feet of a man follow those of a girl along a sidewalk, then upstairs, and then into a room. It is as if the feet were no less expressive than the faces. Clarissa's high heels are seen moving uptown, and later the heavy feet of the souteneur pursue her light ones like a threat. In ASPHALT, the pavement itself is a central motif. The prologue to this film illustrates, after the manner of a documentary, how asphalt is produced and how it voraciously swallows the open land to pave the way for city traffic that thun- dering chaos mastered, as in THE STREET, by the magic gestures of the policeman. Shots featuring the union of asphalt and traffic also form the epilogue of the action proper. The emphasis put on the asphalt goes hand in hand with the insertion of street pictures at every dramatic high point. They herald, for example, a significant love scene between the traffic cop and the tart. Such street pictures were essential components of all street films. In Grune's film, they had helped objectify the horrors of anarchy; in the street films, they denoted the hope of genuine love. TRAGEDY OF THE STREET and ASPHALT radiated a warmth rarely to be found during the stabilized period. This and their pictorial sensitivity the petty-bourgeois home of the police family in AS- PHALT, for instance, is portrayed absorbingly 21 suggest that in those street films the paralyzed inner attitudes rose to the surface. But they were able to pierce the cover of neutrality only by manifesting themselves in the form of dreams. TRAGEDY OP THE STREET and the other street films are dreamlike complexes of images constituting a sort of secret code. By glorifying what Potamkin calls " 'die Strasse 9 of brothels," the street films figuratively express discontent with the stabilized republican regime. 22 Life, they seem to say, is not worth while within the boundaries of the "system" ; it comes into its own only outside the rotten bourgeois world. That the center of life is the street a quarter peopled not with proletarians, but with out- casts indicates that the discontented are far from being socialist- minded. Love in the street stands for ideals averse to Locarno, Weimar and Moscow. During the postwar period, the Grune film emphasized the Cf. Balifcs, Der Gebt des Films, p. 71. aa Potamkin, "Pabst and the Social Film," Mound $ Horn, Jan^March 1988, p. 298. 160 THE STABILIZED PERIOD philistine's return to his middle-class home a resumption of au- thoritarian behavior. The street films emphasize desertion of the home, but still in the interest of authoritarian behavior. The bour- geois runaway whose rebellion was once nothing but a futile esca- pade now is engaged in an escape that amounts to an antidemocratic, antirevolutionary rebellion. (From 1933 on, such Nazi films as HITLERJUNGE QuEX and UM DAS MENSCHENRECHT are to present the communists and leftist intellectuals as libertines given to orgies with loose girls. However, these girls have nothing in common with the ideal prostitutes who under the Republic lured rebels predestined to become Nazis.) In most street films, the rebellion against the ^system" is followed by a submission to it which, instead of putting a definite end to the rebellion, marks it as an event of far-reaching consequence. In fact, these films foreshadow the thorough change of all values then prevalent by implying that the bonds between the prostitute and her bourgeois lover will survive the latter's sub- mission. The street films were no isolated phenomenon. Like them, the many youth films of the period films featuring children or adoles- cents had the character of dreams arising from the paralyzed layers of the collective mind. On the whole, Potamkin's statement that